Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Obstructive ureterocele—an ongoing challenge

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ureterocele is a cystic dilatation of the intravesical ureter that is most commonly observed in females and children, and usually affects the upper moiety of a complete pyeloureteral duplication. According to their position, ureteroceles are divided into intravesical, when the ureterocele is completely contained inside the bladder, and extravesical when part of the cyst extends to the urethra or bladder neck. Most ureteroceles are diagnosed in utero or immediately after birth during an echographic screening of renal malformations. Severe, febrile urinary tract infection is the most common postnatal presentation of ureteroceles, but they may, rarely, prolapse and acutely obstruct the bladder outlet. Once an ureterocele is identified sonographically, a voiding cystourethrogram to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and a 99m-technetium dimercapto-succinic acid renal scan to evaluate the function of the different portions of the kidney are mandatory. VUR in the lower pole is observed in 50% of cases and in the contralateral kidney in 25%. Simple endoscopic puncture of the ureterocele has recently been advocated as an emergency therapy for infected or obstructing ureteroceles and as an elective therapy for intravesical ureteroceles. The rate of additional surgery after elective endoscopic puncture of an orthotopic ureterocele ranges from 7 to 23%. Treatment of ectopic ureteroceles is more challenging and both endoscopic puncture and upper pole partial nephrectomy frequently require additional surgery at the bladder level. The reoperation rate after endoscopic treatment varies from 48 to 100%. It is 15 to 20% after upper pole partial nephrectomy if VUR was absent before the operation, but is as high as 50–100% when VUR was present. Thus, endoscopic incision is appropriate as an emergency treatment or when dealing with a completely intravesical ureterocele. Upper pole partial nephrectomy is the elective treatment for an ectopic ureterocele without preoperative VUR. In an ectopic ureterocele with VUR, no matter which type of primary therapy has been chosen, a secondary procedure at the bladder level, involving ureterocele removal and reimplantation of the ureter(s), should be anticipated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blyth B, Passerini Glazel G, Camuffo C et al. (1993) Endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: intravesical versus ectopic. J Urol 149:556–560

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolduc S, Upadhyay J,Sherman C,Farhat W et al. (2002) Histology of upper pole is unaffected by prenatal diagnosis in duplex system ureteroceles. J Urol 168:1123–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brookes M, Leitman A (1998) Clinical embryology. CRC, Boca Raton

  4. Caldamone AA, Snyder HM, Duckett JW (1984) Ureteroceles in children: follow up of management with upper tract approach. J Urol 131:1130–1132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell M (1951) Ureterocele: a study of 94 instances in 80 infants and children. Surg Gynecol Obstetr 93:705–718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coplen D, Duckett JW (1995) The modern approach to ureteroceles. J Urol 153:169

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper CS, Passerini Glazel G, Hutcheson JC et al. (2000) Long-term follow-up of endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: intravesical versus extravesical. J Urol 164:1097–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Jong TP, Dik P, Klijn AJ et al. (2000) Ectopic ureterocele: results of open surgical therapy in 40 patients J Urol 164:2040–2044

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ericsson NO (1954) Ectopic ureteroceles in infants and children. Acta Chirurg Scand [Suppl 197]:7–21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glassberg KI, Braren V, Duckett JW et al. (1984) Suggested terminology for duplex systems, ectopic ureters and ureteroceles. Report of the Committee on Terminology, Nomenclature and Classification. American Academy of Pediatrics. J Urol 132:1153–1154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzales ETJr (1992) Anomalies of renal pelvis and ureter . In: Kelalis P, King LR, Belman AB (eds) Clinical pediatric urology, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 531–579

  12. Hagg MJ, Mourachov PV, Snyder HM et al. (2000) The modern endoscopic approach to ureteroceles. J Urol 163:940–943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Husmann D, Strand B, Ewalt B et al. (1999) Management of ectopic ureterocele associated with renal duplication. A comparison of partial nephrectomy and endoscopic decompression. J Urol 162:1406–1409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Husmann DA, Strand WR, Ewalt DH et al. (2002) Is endoscopic decompression of neonatal extravesical upper pole ureterocele necessary for prevention of urinary tract infections or bladder neck obstruction? J Urol 167:1440–1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jayanthy VR, Koff SA (1999) Long-term outcome of transurethral puncture of ectopic ureterocele: initial success an late problems. J Urol 162:1077–1080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackie GG, Stephens FD (1975) Duplex kidneys: a correlation of renal dysplasia with position of ureteral orifice. J Urol 114:274–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malek RS, Kelalis PP, Sticker GB et al. (1972) Observations on ureteral ectopy in children. J Urol 107:308–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monfort G, Morisson-Lacombe G, Coquet M (1985) Endoscopic treatment of ureterocele revisited. J Urol 133:1031–1033

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfister C, Ravasse P, Barret E et al. (1998) The value of endoscopic treatment for ureteroceles during the neonatal period. J Urol 159:1006–1009

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shankar KR, Vishwanath N, Rickwood AM (2001) Outcome of patients with prenatally detected duplex system ureterocele; natural history of those managed expectantly. J Urol 165:1226–1228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J (1999) Long-term outcome based on initial surgical approach to ureteroceles. J Urol 162:1072–1076

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sherman ND, Stock JA, Hanna MK (1975) Bladder dysfunction after bilateral ectopic ureterocele repair. J Urol 170:1975–1977

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shokeir AA, Nijman RJM (2002) Ureterocele: an ongoing challenge in infancy and childhood. BJU 90:777–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schussel R, Peters CA, McClintock J (1994) Efficacy of transurethral incision of ureteroceles. Section on Urology, American Academy of Pediatrics Meeting, Dallas 1994, abstract 118

  25. Stephens FD (1971) Caeecoureterocele and concepts on the embryology and aetiology of ureteroceles. Aust N Z J Surg 40:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tanagho EA (1976) Embryologic basis for lower ureteral anomalies: an hypothesis. Urology 48:451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tank ES (1986) Experience with endoscopic incision and open unroofing of ureteroceles. J Urol 136:241–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Upadhyay J, Balduc S et al. (2002) Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the morbidity associated with ureterocele management. J Urol 167:2560–2565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Uson AC, Lattimer JK, Melicow MM (1961) Ureteroceles in infants and children: a report based on 44 cases. Pediatrics 27:971–976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valla JS, Breaud J, Carfagna L et al. (2003) Treatment of ureterocele on duplex ureter: upper pole nephrectomy by retroperitoneoscopy in children based on a series of 24 cases. Eur Urol 43:426–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vates TS, Bukowski T, Triest J et al. (1996) Is there a best alternative to treating the obstructed upper pole? J Urol 156:744–746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Merlini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merlini, E., Lelli Chiesa, P. Obstructive ureterocele—an ongoing challenge. World J Urol 22, 107–114 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0407-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0407-y

Keywords

Navigation