Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique—indications—complications

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this review the technique, indication for and complications of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and antegrade ureter stent insertion are described. In the majority of the cases PCN is performed to relieve urinary obstruction, which can be of benign or malignant nature. Another indication for PCN is for treatment of urinary fistulas. PCN can be performed under ultrasound and/or fluoroscopic guidance, with a success rate of more than 90%. The complication rate is approximately 10% for major and minor complications together and 4–5% for major complications only. Percutaneous antegrade double-J stent insertion usually is performed if retrograde ureter stenting has not been successful. However, especially in malignant obstructions, the success rate for antegrade stenting is higher than for retrograde transvesical double-J stent insertion. In the case of severe infection and bleeding after PCN JJ-stent insertion may be contraindicated so long as there is no sufficient concomitant drainage via a PCN . Lower urinary tract dysfunction should be excluded before stent placement. The complication rate is 2–4%. Consequent stent surveillance with regular stent exchange is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neumayer K (1991) Perkutane nephrostomie In: Lammer J, Schreyer H (eds) Praxis der interventionellen radiologie. Hippokrates, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  2. Molmenti Ep, Balfe DM, Kanterman RY, et al (1996) Anatomy of the retroperitoneum: observations of the distribution of pathologic fluid collections. Radiology 200:95–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skoog SJ, Reed MD, Gaudier FA, Dunn NP (1985) The posterolateral and the retrorenal colon: implication in percutaneous stone extraction. J Urol 134:110–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherman JL, Hopper KD, Greene AJ, et al (1985) The retrorenal colon on computed tomography: a normal variant. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:339–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hopper KD, Yakes WF (1990) The posterior intercostal approach for percutaneous renal procedures: risk of puncturing the lung, spleen, and liver as determined by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:115–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farrell TA, Hicks ME (1997) A review of radiologically guided percutaneous nephrostomies in 303 patients. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 8:769–774

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramson AF, Mitty HA (1992) Update on interventional treatment of urinary obstruction. Urol Radiol 14:234–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wah TM, Weston MJ, Irving HC (2004) Percutaneous nephrostomy insertion: outcome data from a prospective multi-operator study at a UK training centre. Clin Radiol 59:255–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Funaki B, Vatakencherry G (2004) Comparison of single-stick and double-stick techniques for percutaneous nephrostomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:35–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbaric ZL, Hall Th, Cochran ST, et al (1997) Percutaneous nephrostomy: placement under CT and fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:151–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Zagoria RJ, et al (2003) Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 170:45–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nolte-Ernsting CC, Bucker A, Neuerburg JM, et al (1999) MR imaging-guided percutaneous nephrostomy and use of MR compatible catheters in the nondilated porcine urinary tract. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 10:1305–1314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel U, Hussain FF (2004) Percutaneous nephrostomy of nondilated renal collecting systems with fluoroscopic guidance: technique and results. Radiology 233:226–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta S, Gulati M, Uday Shankar K, et al (1997) Percutaneous nephrostomy with real-time sonographic guidance. Acta Radiol 38:454–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramchandani P, Cardella JF, Grassi CJ, et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous nephrostomy. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14:277–281

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stables DP (1982) Percutaneous nephrostomy: techniques, indications, and results. Urol Clin North Am 91:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lang EK, Price ET (1983) Redefinitions of indications for percutaneous nephrostomy. Radiology 147:419–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandhu C, Anson KM, Patel U (2003) Urinary tract stones—part II: current status of treatment. Clin Radiol 58:422–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chitale SV, Scott-Barret S, Ho ETS, et al (2002) The management of ureteric obstruction secondary to malignant pelvic disease. Clin Radiol 57:1118–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shekarriz B, Shekarriz H, Upadhyay J, et al (1999) Outcome of palliative urinary diversion in the treatment of advanced malignancies. Cancer 85:998–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ekici S, Sahin A, Ozen H (2001) Percutaneous nephrostomy in the management of malignant ureteral obstruction secondary to bladder cancer. J Endourol 15:827–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Markowitz DM, Wong KT, Laffev KJ, et al (1989) Maintaining quality of life after palliative diversion for malignant ureteral obstruction. Urol Radiol 11:129–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zagoria RJ, Hodge RG, Dyer RB, Routh WD (1993) Percutaneous nephrostomy for treatment of intractable hemorrhagic cystitis. J Urol 149:1449–1451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicolescu D, Boja R, Osanu V, et al (1992) Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy in the septic kidney. Acta Urol Belg 60:27–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin JH, Rosser CJ, Linebach RF, et al (2000) Are coagulation studies necessary before percutaneous nephrostomy? Tech Urol 6:205–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Spies JB, Rosen RJ, Lebowitz AS (1988) Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular and interventional radiology: a rational approach. Radiology 166:381–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Larsen EH, Gasser TC, Madsen PO (1986) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am 13:591–604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryan JM, Ryan BM, Smith TP (2004) Antibiotic prophylaxis in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:547–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Droghetti L, Giganti M, Memmo A, Zatelli R (2002) Air embolism: diagnosis with single-photon emission tomography and successful hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Br J Anaesth 89:775–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Lezin MA (1994) Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 152:1977–1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vignali C, Lonzi S, Bargellini I, Cioni R, Petruzzi P, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C (2004) Vascular injuries after percutaneous renal procedures: treatment by transcatheter embolization. Eur Radiol 14:723–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Phadke RV, Sawlani V, Rastogi H, Kumar S, Roy S, Baijal SS, Babu VR, Ahlawat R, Kher V, Gujral RB (1997) Iatrogenic renal vascular injuries and their radiological management. Clin Radiol 52:119–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chatziioannou A, Brountzos E, Primetis E, et al (2004) Effects of superselective embolization for renal vascular injuries on renal parenchyma and function. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28:201–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ueda J, Furukawa T, Takahashi S, et al (1996) Arterial embolization to control renal hemorrhage in patients with percutaneous nephrostomy. Abdom Imaging 21:361–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Clark TW, Abraham RJ, Flemming BK (2002) Is routine micropuncture access necessary for percutaneous nephrostomy? A randomized trial. Can Assoc Radiol J 53:87–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Appel R, Musmanno MC, Knight JG (1988) Nephrocolic fistula complicating percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 140:1007–1008

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis S, Patel U (2004) Major complications after percutaneous nephrostomy—lessons from a department audit. Clin Radiol 59:171–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaskarelis IS, Papadaki MG, Malliaraki NE, et al (2001) Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy, percutaneous insertion of ureteral endoprosthesis, and replacement procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:224–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yossepowitch O, Lifshitz A, Dekel Y, et al (2001) Predicting the success of retrograde stenting for managing ureteral obstruction. J Urol 166:1746–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharma SD, Persad RA, Hap A, et al (1996) A review of antegrade stenting in the management of the obstructed kidney. Br J Urol 78:511–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lu DS, Papanicolaou N, Girad M, et al (1994) Percutaneous internal ureteral stent placement: review of technical issues and solutions in 50 consecutive cases. Clin Radiol 49:256–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hackethorn JC, Boren SR, Dotter CT Rosch J (1985) Antegrade internal ureteral stenting: a technical refinement. Radiology 156:827–828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, et al (2002) Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics 22:1005–1022

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Patel U, Abubacker ZM (2004) Ureteral stent placement without postprocedural nephrostomy tube: experience with 41 patients. Radiology 230:435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lang EK (1988) Percutaneous ureterocystostomy and ureteroneocystostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:1065–1068

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hausegger KA, Sonnleitner J, Uggowitzer M, et al (1996) Iliac–ureteral fistula, a rare complication of ureteral splinting. Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr 164:525–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, et al (1991) Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 146:1487–1491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Knopf HJ (2003) Management of forgotten DJ stent. Urologe A 42:1039–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lugmayr H, Pauer W (1996) Wallstents for the treatment of extrinsic malignant ureteral obstruction: midterm results. Radiology 198:105–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Flückiger F, Lammer J, Klein GE, et al (1993) Malignant ureteral obstruction: preliminary results of treatment with metallic self-expandable stents. Radiology 186:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lang EK, Irwin RJ, Lopez-Martinez RA, et al (1998) Placement of metallic stents in ureters obstructed by carcinoma of the cervix to maintain renal function in patients undergoing long-term chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1595–1599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Klagenfurt General Hospital, St.Veiter Strasse 47, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Klaus Armin Hausegger

  2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Graz, Graz, Austria

    Horst Rupert Portugaller

Authors
  1. Klaus Armin Hausegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Horst Rupert Portugaller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Armin Hausegger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hausegger, K.A., Portugaller, H.R. Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique—indications—complications. Eur Radiol 16, 2016–2030 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0136-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0136-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation