Skip to main content
Log in

3D imaging with an isocentric mobile C-arm

Comparison of image quality with spiral CT

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of the new 3D imaging system (ISO-C-3D) for osteosyntheses of tibial condylar fractures in comparison with spiral CT (CT). Sixteen human cadaveric knees were examined with a C-arm 3D imaging system and spiral computed tomography. Various screws and plates of steel and titanium were used for osteosynthesis in these specimens. Image quality and clinical value of multiplanar (MP) reformatting of both methods were analyzed. In addition, five patients with tibial condylar fractures were examined for diagnosis and intra-operative control. The image quality of the C-arm 3D imaging system in the cadaveric study was rated as significantly worse than that of spiral CT with and without prostheses. After implantation of prostheses an increased incidence of artifacts was observed, but the diagnostic accuracy was not affected. Titanium implants caused the smallest number of artifacts. The image quality of ISO-C is inferior to CT, and metal artifacts were more prominent, but the clinical value was equal. ISO-C-3D can be useful in planning operative reconstructions and can verify the reconstruction of articular surfaces and the position of implants with diagnostic image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson DW, Duwelius PJ (1991) CT-guided fixation of sacral fractures and sacroiliac joint disruptions. Radiology 180:527–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayr E, Häuser H, Ruter A, Bohndorf K (1999) Minimally invasive intraoperative CT-guided correction of calcaneal osteosynthesis. Unfallchirurg 102:239–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Linsenmaier U, Rock C, Euler E et al (2002) Three-dimensional CT with a modified c-arm image intensifier: feasibility. Radiology 224:286–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McEnery KW, Wilson AJ, Pilgram TK, Murphy WA, Marushack MM (1994) Fractures of the tibial plateau: value of spiral CT coronal plane reconstructions for detecting displacement in vitro. Am J Roentgenol 163:1177–1181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blaser PF, Wicky S, Husmann O, Meuli RA, Leyvraz PF (1998) Value of 3D CT in diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the tibial plateau. Swiss Surg 4:180–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liow RY, Birdsall PD, Mucci B, Greiss ME (1999) Spiral computed tomography with two- and three dimensional reconstruction in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Orthopedics 22:929–932

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuong SJ, Williamson DS, Baker ND et al (1999) Comparison of polytomography and computed tomography for fracture assessment. Skelet Radiol 28:330–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fishman EK, Derek R, Kawashima A, Scott WW, Robertson DD (1993) Effect of image display on the quality of multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography data. Invest Radiol 28:146–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Lobenhoffer P, Tscherne H (1996) Complex trauma of the knee joint. Diagnosis, management and therapeutic principles. Unfallchirurg 99:616–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lobenhoffer P, Oestern HJ (1997) The potentials of minimally invasive measures in the knee joint. Chirurg 68:1093–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lobenhoffer P (1997) Minimally invasive knee joint surgery. Zentralbl Chir 122:974–985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haper MC, Henstrof JE, Vessely MB, Allen WC (1995) Closed reduction and percutaneous stabilisation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthopedics 18:623–626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Link TM, Berning W, Scherf S et al (2000) CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:165–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giraudeau B, Mary JY (2001) Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Stat Med 20:3205–3214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kotsianos D, Rock C, Wirth S et al (2002) Detection of tibial condylar fractures using 3D imaging with a mobile image amplifier (Siemens ISO-C-3D): comparison with plain films and spiral CT. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174:82–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotsianos D, Rock C, Euler E et al (2001) 3D-imaging with a mobile surgical image enhancement equipment (ISO-C-3D). Initial examples of fracture diagnosis of peripheral joints in comparison with spiral CT and conventional radiography. Unfallchirurg 104:834–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rock C, Kotsianos D, Linsenmaier U et al (2002) Studies on image quality, high contrast resolution and dose for the axial skeleton and limbs with a new, dedicated CT system (ISO-C-3D). Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174:170–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalender W, Hebel R, Ebersberger J (1987) Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 164:576–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robertson D, Weiss P, Fishman E, Magid D, Walker P (1988) Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifact in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 121:236–241

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang G, Synder D, O’Sullivan J, Vannier M (1996) Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction. IEEE Trans Med Imag 16:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seitz P, Rueggsegger P (1985) CT bone densitometry of the anchorage of artificial knee joints. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:621–622

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robertson D, Yuan J, Wang G, Vannier M (1997) Total hip prothesis metal artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:293–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang G, Frei T, Vannier M (2000) Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT. Acad Radiol 7:607–614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Minoui A, Chevrot A, Godefroy D, Drape J, Sarazin L, Pessis E (1997) Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic hip implants with maximum intensity projection. Radiology 205:633

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson D, Magid D, Poss R, Fishman E, Brooker A, Sledge C (1989) Enhanced computed tomographic techniques for the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:271–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harmati N, Staron RB, Mazel-Sperling K et al (1994) CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:429–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, Brooker AF, Weiss P, Sieglm SS (1986) Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology 160:675–681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Savolaine ER, Ebraheim N (2000) Assessment of femoral neck nonunion with multiplanar computed tomography reconstruction. Orthopedics 23:713–715

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gross SC, Kowalski JB, Lee SH, Terry B, Honickman SJ (1985) Surgical ligation clip artifacts on CT scans. Radiology 156:831–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ebraheim NA, Coombs R, Rusin JJ, Jackson WT (1990) Reduction of postoperative CT artifacts of pelvic fractures by use of titanium implants. Orthopedics 13:1357–1358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fiala TG, Novelline RA, Yaremchuk MJ (1993) Comparison of CT imaging artifacts from craniomaxilofacial internal fixation devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1227–1232

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rieker O, Mildenberg P, Rudig L, Schweden F, Thelen M (1998) CT of fractures: comparison of volume and surface reconstruction. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 169:490–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothea Kotsianos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotsianos, D., Wirth, S., Fischer, T. et al. 3D imaging with an isocentric mobile C-arm. Eur Radiol 14, 1590–1595 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2316-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2316-2

Keywords

Navigation