Abstract
We aimed to validate QUALEFFO-41 in Arabic language and to examine the use of QUALEFFO-41 in clinical practice for assessing quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures (VF). A total of 201 women were included in the study: 106 (53%) cases with at least one vertebral fracture which had been defined morphometrically and 95 (47%) women with OP or osteopenia and no fractures as a control group. The QUALEFFO was translated into Arabic and applied to case–control pairs with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures to evaluate its reliability, validity, and discriminatory ability. It was also used to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of case–control with prevalent morphometric fractures. The QOL of all subjects was concurrently assessed using SF-36 for comparison. QUALEFFO-41 had good reliability with adequate convergent and discriminatory validity. There were good correlations between QUALEFFO-41 and SF-36. Subjects with clinical osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significant impairment of HRQoL on the QUALEFFO compared with controls. Similar results were also observed using the SF-36. ROC curve analysis revealed that QUALEFFO-41 had significant ability to discriminate between morphometric fracture subjects versus and controls. The QUALEFFO discriminates for pain (P = 0.002), physical function (P < 0.0001), social function (P = 0.04), general health (P = 0.001), and mental function (P = 0.01), whereas the SF-36 discriminates exclusively for physical function (P = 0.01) and social function (P = 0.02). The Moroccan Arabic version of the QUALEFFO is a reliable and valid instrument that can be administered to Arabic patients suffering from vertebral fracture osteoporosis to evaluate their quality of life. Its measurement properties were comparable with versions in other languages. In addition, the quality of life measured by QUALEFFO is decreased in patients with vertebral fracture due to OP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010–1018
Kanis JA, Minne HW, Meunier PJ et al (1992) Quality of life and vertebral osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2:161–163
Randell AG, Bhalerao N, Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA, Silverman SL. Quality of life in osteoporosis: reliability, consistency, and validity of the osteoporosis assessment questionnaire
Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B, Love B et al (1997) Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 12(3):456–463
Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Adachi JD, Epstein RS (1999) Development and validation of the mini-osteoporosis quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) in osteoporotic women with back pain due to vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Osteoporos Int 10(3):207–13
Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D et al (1997) Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7(1):36–38
Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D et al. (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working party for quality of life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10 (2):150–60
Khoudri I, Ali Zeggwagh A, Abidi K, Madani N, Abouqal R (2007) Measurement properties of the short form 36 and health-related quality of life after intensive care in Morocco. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51(2):189–197
Guillemin F, Bombardier C (1993) Beaton D Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432
Guyatt GH (1993) The philosophy of health-related quality of life translation. Qual Life Res 2:461–465
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191
Guillemin F (1995) Cross cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 24:61–63
Genant HK, Wu CY, Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148
Scott-Lennox JA, Wu AW, Boyer JG, Ware JE Jr (1999) Reliability and validity of French, German, Italian, Dutch, and UK English translations of the medical outcomes study HIV health survey. Med Care 37(9):908–925
Nettleman MD (1988) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 9(8):374–377
Ramírez Pérez E, Clark P, Wacher NH, Cardiel MH, del Pilar Diez García M (2008) Cultural adaptation and validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) in a Mexican population. Clin Rheumatol 27(2):151–161
Koçyigit H, Gülseren S, Erol A, Hizli N, Memis A (2003) The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Clin Rheumatol 22(1):18–23
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the controls subjects who allowed us to study their quality of life, and the committee that prepared and reviewed the forward and backward translation.
Disclosures
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rostom, S., Allali, F., Bahiri, R. et al. Psychometric properties evaluation of the quality of life Questionnaire of the European foundation for Osteoporosis in Arabic population. Rheumatol Int 32, 2037–2049 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1910-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1910-2