Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the longitudinal arch morphology and related factors in primary school children. Five hundred and seventy-nine primary school children were enrolled in the study. Generalized joint laxity, foot progression angle, frontal hindfoot alignment, and longitudinal arch height in dynamic position were evaluated. The footprints were recorded by Harris and Beath footprint mat and arch index of Staheli was calculated. The mean age was 9.23 ± 1.66 years. Four hundred and fifty-six children (82.8%) were evaluated as normal and mild flexible flatfoot, and 95 children (17.2%) were evaluated as moderate and severe flexible flatfoot. The mean arch indices of the feet was 0.74 ± 0.25. The percentage of flexible flatfoot in hypermobile and non-hypermobile children was found 27.6 and 13.4%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in dynamic arch evaluation between hypermobile and non-hypermobile children. There was a significant negative correlation between arch index and age, and a significant negative correlation between hypermobility score and age. Our study confirms that the flexible flatfoot and the hypermobility are developmental profiles.
References
Stahelli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M (1987) The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(3):426–428
Sullivan JA (1999) Pediatric flatfoot: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:44–53
Lin C-J, Lai K-A, KuanT-S, Chou Y-L (2001) Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 21:378–382
Volpon JB (1994) Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop 14:83–85
Rose GK (1990) Flat feet in children. Br Med J 301:1330–1331
Wenger DR, Mauldin D, Speck G, Morgan D, Lieber RL (1989) Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flat foot in infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(6):800–810
Beighton PH, Solomon L, Soskolne CL (1973) Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:413–418
Barry RJ, Scrantan PE Jr (1983) Flat foot in children. Clin Orthop 181:68–75
Staheli LT, Corbetta M, Wyss C, King H (1985) Lower extremity rotational problems in children. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:39–47
Cappello T, Song KM (1998) Determining treatment of flatfeet in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 10:77–81
Akcali O, Tiner M, Ozaksoy D (2000) Effects of lower extremity rotation on prognosis of flexible flatfoot in children. Foot Ankle Int 21(9):772–774
Basmajian JV, Stecko G (1963) The role of muscles in arch support of the foot: an electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:1184–1190
Vougiouka O, Moustaki M, Tsanaktsi M (2000) Benign hypermobility syndrome in Greek school children. Eur J Pediatr 159(8):628
Gedalia A, Person D, Brewer E, Giannini E (1985) Hypermobility of the joints in juvenile episodic arthritis/arthralgia. J Pediatr 107:873–876
Jesse EF, Owen DS, Sagar KB (1980) The benign hypermobile joint syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 23:1053–1056
Rao BU, Joseph B (1992) The influence of foot wears on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74-B(4):525–527
Sachithanandam V, Joseph B (1995) The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flatfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77-B:254–257
Rodriguez AG, Jimenez FM, Varo MC, Garcia EG, Aracena JG, Crehuet JF (1999) Flexible flat feet in children: a real problem? Pediatrics 103(6):e84
Echarri JJ, Forriol F (2003) The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop 12:141–146
Cheng JCY, Chan PS, Hui PW (1991) Joint laxity in children. J Pediatr Orthop 11:752–756
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El, O., Akcali, O., Kosay, C. et al. Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int 26, 1050–1053 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0128-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0128-1