Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the longitudinal arch morphology and related factors in primary school children. Five hundred and seventy-nine primary school children were enrolled in the study. Generalized joint laxity, foot progression angle, frontal hindfoot alignment, and longitudinal arch height in dynamic position were evaluated. The footprints were recorded by Harris and Beath footprint mat and arch index of Staheli was calculated. The mean age was 9.23 ± 1.66 years. Four hundred and fifty-six children (82.8%) were evaluated as normal and mild flexible flatfoot, and 95 children (17.2%) were evaluated as moderate and severe flexible flatfoot. The mean arch indices of the feet was 0.74 ± 0.25. The percentage of flexible flatfoot in hypermobile and non-hypermobile children was found 27.6 and 13.4%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in dynamic arch evaluation between hypermobile and non-hypermobile children. There was a significant negative correlation between arch index and age, and a significant negative correlation between hypermobility score and age. Our study confirms that the flexible flatfoot and the hypermobility are developmental profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Stahelli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M (1987) The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(3):426–428

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan JA (1999) Pediatric flatfoot: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:44–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin C-J, Lai K-A, KuanT-S, Chou Y-L (2001) Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 21:378–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Volpon JB (1994) Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop 14:83–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rose GK (1990) Flat feet in children. Br Med J 301:1330–1331

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wenger DR, Mauldin D, Speck G, Morgan D, Lieber RL (1989) Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flat foot in infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(6):800–810

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beighton PH, Solomon L, Soskolne CL (1973) Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:413–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barry RJ, Scrantan PE Jr (1983) Flat foot in children. Clin Orthop 181:68–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Staheli LT, Corbetta M, Wyss C, King H (1985) Lower extremity rotational problems in children. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cappello T, Song KM (1998) Determining treatment of flatfeet in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 10:77–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Akcali O, Tiner M, Ozaksoy D (2000) Effects of lower extremity rotation on prognosis of flexible flatfoot in children. Foot Ankle Int 21(9):772–774

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Basmajian JV, Stecko G (1963) The role of muscles in arch support of the foot: an electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:1184–1190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vougiouka O, Moustaki M, Tsanaktsi M (2000) Benign hypermobility syndrome in Greek school children. Eur J Pediatr 159(8):628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gedalia A, Person D, Brewer E, Giannini E (1985) Hypermobility of the joints in juvenile episodic arthritis/arthralgia. J Pediatr 107:873–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jesse EF, Owen DS, Sagar KB (1980) The benign hypermobile joint syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 23:1053–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao BU, Joseph B (1992) The influence of foot wears on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74-B(4):525–527

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sachithanandam V, Joseph B (1995) The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flatfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77-B:254–257

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez AG, Jimenez FM, Varo MC, Garcia EG, Aracena JG, Crehuet JF (1999) Flexible flat feet in children: a real problem? Pediatrics 103(6):e84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Echarri JJ, Forriol F (2003) The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop 12:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng JCY, Chan PS, Hui PW (1991) Joint laxity in children. J Pediatr Orthop 11:752–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozlem El.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El, O., Akcali, O., Kosay, C. et al. Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int 26, 1050–1053 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0128-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0128-1

Keywords

Navigation