Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess probable plantar pressure alterations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by comparison with normal subjects and to investigate the probable relation between pressure distribution under the foot and radiologic foot erosion score.
Methods
Two hundred feet of 50 chronic RA patients and 50 healthy controls were evaluated. Static and dynamic pedobarographic evaluations were used to define the plantar pressure distribution. Also, the modified Larsen scoring system was used to detect the staging of erosions on feet radiograms of the RA patients.
Results
Static pedobarography revealed higher pressure and contact areas in the forefoot. All dynamic pedobarographic parameters except for plantar contact area were significantly different between the RA patients and control subjects. Patients with high erosion scores had higher static forefoot and dynamic phalanx peak pressure values.
Conclusion
Pedobarographic investigation can be useful to evaluate pressure distribution disorders in RA feet and may provide suitable guidelines for the design of various plantar supports.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harris ED Jr (1990) Rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiology and implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 322:1277–1289
Coughlin MJ (1984) The rheumatoid foot. Postgrad Med 75:207–216
Priolo F, Bacarini L, Cammisa M, Cerase A, Ferrara R, Della Casa-Alberighi OJ (1997) Radiographic changes in the feet of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol 24:2113–2118
Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324
Paimela L (1992) The radiographic criterion in the 1987 revised criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Reassessment in a prospective study of early disease. Arthritis Rheum 35:255–258
Mottonen TT (1988) Prediction of erosiveness and rate of development of new erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 47:648–653
Drossaers-Bakker KW, Amesz E, Zwinderman AH, Breedveld FC, Hazes JM (2000) A comparison of three radiologic scoring systems for the long-term assessment of rheumatoid arthritis: findings of an ongoing prospective inception cohort study of 132 women followed up for a median of twelve years. Arthritis Rheum 43:1465–1472
Bitzan P, Giurea A, Wanivenhaus A (1997) Plantar pressure distribution after resection of the metatarsal heads in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 18:391–397
Dereymaeker G, Mulier T, Stuer P, Peeraer L, Fabry G (1997) Pedogynographic measurements after forefoot reconstruction in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Foot Ankle Int 18:270–276
Hills AP, Hennig EM, McDonald M, Bar-Or O (2001) Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25:1674–1679
Vela SA, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Anaim AA (1998) The effect of increased weight on peak pressures: implications for obesity and diabetic foot pathology. J Foot Ankle Surg 37:416–420
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353
Pinals RS, Masi AT, Larsen RA (1981) Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 24:1308–1315
Larsen A (1995) How to apply Larsen score in evaluating radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis in long-term studies. J Rheumatol 22:1974–1975
Priolo F, Bacarini L, Cammisa M, Cerase A, Ferrara R, Della Casa-Alberighi O (1997) Radiologic changes in the feet of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 24:2113–2118
Mini-Emed System (1991) Operating manual. Novel, Munich
Hennig EM, Rosenbaum D (1994) Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison with adults. Foot Ankle 15:35–40
Hodge MC, Bach TM, Carter GM (1999) Orthotic management of plantar pressure and pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14:567–575
Stoop ND (2002) Surgery of the rheumatoid forefoot. Curr Orthopaed 16:187–192
Haas C, Kladny B, Lott S, Weseloh G, Swoboda B (1999) Progression of foot deformities in rheumatoid arthritis—a radiologic follow-up study over 5 years. Z Rheumatol 58:351–357
Woodburn J, Helliwell P (1996) Relationship between heel position and distribution of forefoot plantar pressures and skin callosities in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 55:806–810
Woodburn J, Stableford Z, Helliwell PS (2000) Preliminary investigation of debridement of plantar callosities in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:652–654
Kerry RM, Holt GM, Stockley I (1994) The foot in chronic rheumatoid arthritis: a continuing problem. Foot 4:201–203
Richardson EG (1998) Rheumatoid foot. In: Canale TS (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Ninth edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1785–1812
Hanyu T, Yamazaki H, Ishikawa H, Arai K, Tohyama CT, Nakazono K, Murasawa A (2001) Flexible hinge toe implant arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: long-term results. J Orthop Sci 6:141–147
Sokka T, Kainkainen A, Kankainen A, Hannonen P (2000) Scores for functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are correlated at higher levels with pain scores than with radiographic scores. Arthritis Rheum 43:386–389
Belt EA, Kaarela K, Maenpaa H, Kauppi MJ, Lehtinen JT, Lehto MU (2001) Relationship of ankle joint involvement with subtalar destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A 20-year follow-up study. Joint Bone Spine 68:154–157
Hulmans MH, Jacobs JWG, Van Der Heijde DMFM, Van Albada-Kuipers GA, Schenk Y, Bijlsma LWJ (2000) The course of radiologic damage during the first six years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43:1927–1940
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuna, H., Birtane, M., Taştekin, N. et al. Pedobarography and its relation to radiologic erosion scores in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 26, 42–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-004-0504-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-004-0504-7