Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life and persistent symptoms in relation to (R-)CHOP14, (R-)CHOP21, and other therapies among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of the population-based PHAROS-registry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing number of longer-living patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and serious side effects of treatment urged us to study the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and persistent (treatment-related) symptoms in unselected patients after different treatment modalities and compare HRQoL of patients with a normative population. The population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry was used to select all patients diagnosed with DLBCL from 2004 to 2010. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was completed twice, with a 1-year interval. Detailed data on treatment were extracted from the Population-based HAematological Registry for Observational Studies. Two hundred fifty-six patients responded (84 %, T1). Compared to patients treated with rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone every 21 days ((R-)CHOP21), those who underwent (R-)CHOP14 more often reported tingling in the hands and feet (27 vs 42 %, p = 0.02) and fatigue (35 vs 46 %, p = 0.03) and reported a lower global health status/HRQoL. Mean HRQoL was statistically and clinically relevantly lower among DLBCL patients compared to a normative population (p < 0.01). Persistent tingling in hands/feet was reported more often by older patients and patients treated with (R-)CHOP14 independently of the other characteristics. Furthermore, patients who reported symptoms exhibited significantly lower HRQoL compared to patients without symptoms/worries. Patients treated with (R-)CHOP14 reported more neuropathic symptoms, more fatigue, and a lower HRQoL than patients treated with (R-)CHOP21. Alertness for persistent symptoms that occur during and after treatment of DLBCL patients is needed and may help to avoid lasting negative influence on their HRQoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M et al (2013) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2013, assessed on August 2013

  2. Dutch Cancer Society (2011) Cancer in the Netherlands until 2020, trends and prognoses [Kanker in Nederland tot 2020, Trends en prognoses]

  3. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J et al (2002) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lossos IS (2005) Molecular pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 23:6351–6357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S et al (1993) Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 328:1002–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C et al (2005) Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J Clin Oncol 23:4117–4126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A et al (2006) CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol 7:379–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Kloess M et al (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:634–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham D, Hawkes EA, Jack A et al (2013) Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3 comparison of dose intensification with 14-day versus 21-day cycles. Lancet 381:1817–1826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delarue R, Tilly H, Mounier N et al (2013) Dose-dense rituximab-CHOP compared with standard rituximab-CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (the LNH03-6B study): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:525–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doorduijn J, Buijt I, Holt B et al (2005) Self-reported quality of life in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy. Eur J Haematol 75:116–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jerkeman M, Kaasa S, Hjermstad M et al (2001) Health-related quality of life and its potential prognostic implications in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a Nordic Lymphoma Group Trial. Med Oncol 18:85–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merli F, Bertini M, Luminari S et al (2004) Quality of life assessment in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with anthracycline-containing regimens.Report of a prospective study by the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. Haematologica 89:973–978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heutte N, Haioun C, Feugier P et al (2011) Quality of life in 269 patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab versus observation after autologous stem cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma 52:1239–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung HA, Park S, Cho JH et al (2012) Prognostic relevance of pretreatment quality of life in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-CHOP: results from a prospective cohort study. Ann Hematol 91:1747–1756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology (ed 3rd). World Health Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. van de Poll-Franse LV, Horevoorts N, Eenbergen MV et al (2011) The patient reported outcomes following initial treatment and long term evaluation of survivorship registry: scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts. Eur J Cancer

  18. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH et al (2003) The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 49:156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van de Poll-Franse LV, Mols F, Gundy CM et al (2011) Normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-sexuality items in the general Dutch population. Eur J Cancer

  21. Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G et al (2011) Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. J Clin Oncol 29:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen RE, Arora NK, Bellizzi KM et al (2013) Health-related quality of life among survivors of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 119:672–680

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mols F, Aaronson NK, Vingerhoets AJ et al (2007) Quality of life among long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a population-based study. Cancer 109:1659–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reeve BB, Potosky AL, Smith AW et al (2009) Impact of cancer on health-related quality of life of older Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:860–868

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith SK, Zimmerman S, Williams CS, Zebrack BJ (2009) Health status and quality of life among non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Cancer 115:3312–3323

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim BJ, Park HR, Roh HJ et al (2010) Chemotherapy-related polyneuropathy may deteriorate quality of life in patients with B-cell lymphoma. Qual Life Res 19:1097–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank all patients and their doctors for their participation in the study. Special thanks goes to Dr. M. van Bommel for the independent advice and answering questions of patients invited to participate. Specialists in the following hospitals provided cooperation: Catharina-hospital, Eindhoven; Jeroen Bosch hospital, ‘s Hertogenbosch; Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven and Veldhoven; Sint Anna hospital, Geldrop; St. Elisabeth hospital, Tilburg; Twee Steden hospital, Tilburg; VieCurie hospital, Venlo and Venray, and Hospital Bernhoven, Oss.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Jonker-Driessen Foundation and ZonMW: the Netherlands organization for health research and development, and through PHAROS: Population-based HAematological Registry for Observational Studies (#80-82500-98-01007). Dr. Floortje Mols is supported by a VENI grant (#451-10-041) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (The Hague, The Netherlands), Dr. Lonneke van de Poll-Franse is supported by a Cancer Research Award from the Dutch Cancer Society (#UVT-2009-4349). These funding agencies had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Oerlemans.

Additional information

Authorship and disclosures

All authors contributed to the conception and design of this paper; SO, DEI, and LVP wrote the paper, all other authors revised the paper critically for important intellectual content; SO, FM, and MRN recruited the patients; DEI, EGB, JWC, and PH collected the clinical data; SO and EGB performed the statistical analysis; LVP was the principal investigator and takes primary responsibility for the paper.

This manuscript is not being considered for publication elsewhere, and the findings of this manuscript have not been previously published.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oerlemans, S., Issa, D.E., van den Broek, E.C. et al. Health-related quality of life and persistent symptoms in relation to (R-)CHOP14, (R-)CHOP21, and other therapies among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of the population-based PHAROS-registry. Ann Hematol 93, 1705–1715 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2099-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2099-8

Keywords

Navigation