Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Which health-related quality of life aspects are important to patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving targeted therapies and to health care professionals?

GIMEMA and EORTC Quality of Life Group

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) aspects valued the most by patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving targeted therapies (TT), and to compare their perception with that of health-care professionals’ (HCPs). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 137 CML patients receiving TT from five different countries. An additional sample of 99 CML patients, completing an online interview, was considered for supportive analyses. A sample of 59 HCPs from 12 countries also participated in the study. Patients and HCPs were asked to rate and rank the importance of a predefined list of 74 HRQOL aspects of potential relevance for CML patients. Patients and HCPs agreed that the following five aspects are most important: fatigue, muscle cramps, swelling, worries, and uncertainty about health condition in the future, and importance of social support in coping with the disease. However, the difference in rankings between the two groups was substantial with respect to other HRQOL aspects investigated. Patients valued some issues related to symptoms much higher than HCPs, thus suggesting that a better symptom management could be the crucial aspects to improve HRQOL of CML patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kris MG, Benowitz SI, Adams S et al (2010) Clinical cancer advances 2010: annual report on progress against cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 28(36):5327–5347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cortes JE, Jones D, O'Brien S et al (2010) Results of dasatinib therapy in patients with early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 28(3):398–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S et al (2010) Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 362(24):2251–2259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kantarjian HM, Giles FJ, Bhalla KN et al (2011) Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Blood 117(4):1141–1145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Efficace F, Cocks K, Breccia M et al (2012) Time for a new era in the evaluation of targeted therapies for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: inclusion of quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 81(2):123–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Cancer Institute (2006) The NCI Strategic Plan for Leading the Nation. To Eliminate the Suffering and Death due to Cancer. National Institutes of Health Publication No 06-5773 http://strategicplan.nci.nih.gov/pdf/nci_2007_strategic_plan.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2012

  7. de Haes JC (1988) Quality of life: conceptual and theoretical considerations. In: Watson M, Greer S, Thomas C (eds) Psychosocial oncology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hochhaus A (2011) Managing chronic myeloid leukemia as a chronic disease. American Society of Hematology Educational Program Book. Hematology 2011:128–135. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Efficace F, Baccarani M, Breccia M et al (2011) Health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long-term therapy with imatinib compared with the general population. Blood 118(17):4554–4560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson C, Aaronson N, Blazeby JM et al (2011) EORTC guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Publication, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basch E, Bennett A, Pietanza MC (2011) Use of patient-reported outcomes to improve the predictive accuracy of clinician-reported adverse events. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(24):1808–1810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris K, Chow E, Zhang L et al (2009) Patients' and health care professionals' evaluation of health-related quality of life issues in bone metastases. Eur J Cancer 45(14):2510–2518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. US Food and Drug Administration (2009) Guidance for Industry: patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration December.http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2012

  14. Laugsand E, Sprangers M, Bjordal K et al (2010) Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: a multicenter European study. Health Qual Life Outcome 8:104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edelman EJ, Gordon K, Justice AC (2011) Patient and provider-reported symptoms in the post-cART era. AIDS Behav 15(4):853–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nazha A, Williams LA, Kantarjian H et al (2011) Fatigue in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients (pts) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 118, Abstract 3785

  17. Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon FX et al (2010) Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol 28(14):2381–2388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinilla-Ibarz J, Cortes J, Mauro MJ (2011) Intolerance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: definitions and clinical implications. Cancer 117(4):688–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Savage DG, Szydlo RM, Goldman (1997) Clinical features at diagnosis in 430 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia seen at a referral centre over a 16-year period. Br J Haematol 96:111–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sneeuw KC, Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK (2002) The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease. J Clin Epidemiol 55(11):1130–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petersen MA, Larsen H, Pedersen L et al (2006) Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: comparing patient and physician assessments. Eur J Cancer 42(8):1159–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Antolini L, Mahon F-X et al (2011) Multicenter independent assessment of outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(7):553–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Efficace F, Breccia M, Saussele S, et al (2011) International development of an EORTC measure to assess patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and symptoms in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 118: Abstract 3132

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are in debt to all the patients who participated in this study and we acknowledge the essential contribution of the “Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie, Linfomi e Mieloma (AIL)”—“Chronic Myeloid Group” which provided logistic and administrative support in the online survey used in this study. The study was supported in part by a grant by the EORTC Quality of Life Group. Susanne Saussele is supported by DJCLS R 10/20. We would like also to acknowledge Dr. Marcos Fisfis, Dr. Emmanuil Vardas, and Dr. Erofili Papadopoulou, who contributed to the study in the Dental Oncology Unit in Athens.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Efficace.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 21.5 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Efficace, F., Breccia, M., Saussele, S. et al. Which health-related quality of life aspects are important to patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving targeted therapies and to health care professionals?. Ann Hematol 91, 1371–1381 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1458-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1458-6

Keywords

Navigation