Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical bases of endoscopic tarsal tunnel release: anatomical and ultra-sonographic study with a preliminary clinical report

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of our study is to present the anatomical bases of a new technique for endoscopic tarsal release and to report the preliminary clinical outcome for this technique.

Method

Anatomical study The technique was performed on 12 intact adult lower limb specimens. The location of portals was evaluated as well as the integrity of the neurovascular bundle. Ultra-sonographic study A prospective case control study was done on 10 patients (11 feet) and 14 normal volunteers (28 feet). Three parameters were measured; the thickness of flexor retinaculum, the nerve cross-section area and the depth of tarsal tunnel. Clinical study Seven patients with idiopathic proximal Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome (TTS) were treated by endoscopic TTR using a modified trocar cannula and dilator system. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation was done by electrophysiological studies and ultra-sonography. Evaluation was done using Takakura’s rating scale.

Results

Anatomical study The proximal and distal portals were located at 13 mm (±1.59 STD) and 17.91 mm (±1.44 STD) from the proximal and distal borders of FR, respectively. There was intact neurovascular bundle in all specimens. Ultra-sonographic study There was statistically significant difference in the mean nerve cross-sectional area and the thickness of the FR between the control group and the patients group (P < 0.05). Clinical study The mean TRS improved from 2.28 ± 1.11 STD preoperatively to 8.43 ± 0.97 at 2 years follow-up. The overall good to excellent results was 85.7%.

Conclusion

Based on this preliminary clinical study, endoscopic tarsal tunnel release by the technique described could obtain excellent to good results in 85.7% of patients with idiopathic proximal tarsal tunnel. The anatomical study proved the safety of the technique on the neurovascular structures. Ultra-sonography was an effective tool for preoperative diagnosis and postoperative follow-up.

Level of evidence Case series study, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aktan Ikiz ZA, Ucerler H, Uygur M (2007) Dimensions of the anterior tarsal tunnel and features of the deep peroneal nerve in relation to clinical application. Surg Radiol Anat 29(7):527–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alshami AM, Cairns CW, Wylie BK, Souvlis T (2009) Reliability and size of the measurement error when determining the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel with ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(7):1098–1102. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreasen LN, Birn H, Teglbjaerg PS, Haase J, Struijk JJ (2010) Size and separability of the calcaneal and the medial and lateral plantar nerves in the distal tibial nerve. Anat Sci Int 85(1):13–22. doi:10.1007/s12565-009-0045-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baba H, Wada M, Annen S, Azuchi M, Imura S, Tomita K (1997) The tarsal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of surgical results using multivariate analysis. Int Orthop 21(2):67–71. doi:10.1007/s002640050122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bain GI, Bajhau A (2005) Endoscopic release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow using the Agee device: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 21(6):691–695. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.02.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cain JD, DiNucci K (2009) Revisional peripheral nerve surgery. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 26(1):11–22. doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2008.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cimino WR (1990) Foot Ankle 11(1):47–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Day FN, Naples J (1996) endoscopic tarsal tunnel release: update 96. J Foot Ankle Surg 35(3):225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gondring WH, Trepman E, Sheilds B (2009) Tarsal tunnel syndrome: assessment of treatment outcome with an anatomic pain intensity scale. Foot Ankle Surg 15:133–138. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2008.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heimkes B, Posel P, Stotz S, Wolf K (1987) The proximal and distal tarsal tunnel syndromes: an anatomical study. Int Orthop 11:193–196. doi:10.1007/BF00271447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jerosch J, Schunck J, Khoja A (2006) Results of surgical treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle Surg 12:205–208. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2006.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keck C (1962) The tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 44-A:180

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lam SJS (1962) A tarsal tunnel syndrome. Lancet 2:1354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lau JT, Stavrou P (2004) Posterior tibial nerve—primary. Foot Ankle Clin 9:271–285. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2003.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mondelli M, Cioni R (1998) Electrophysiological evidence of a relationship between idiopathic carpal and tarsal tunnel syndromes. Neurophysiol Clin 28:391–397. doi:10.1016/S0987-7053(99)80023-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Reale F (1998) Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109:418–425. doi:10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00039-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Okan B, Mehmet A, Figen G (2003) Neurovascular branching in the tarsal tunnel. Neuroanatomy 2:39–41

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preston DC, Shapiro BE (2005) Nerve conduction studies: normal adults values. In: Preston DC, Shapiro BE (eds) Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders. Clinical electropysiologic correlations, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Butterworth, pp 663–665

  19. Sora MC, Jilavu R, Grübl A, Genser-Strobl B, Staykov D, Seicean A (2008) The posteromedial neurovascular bundle of the ankle: an anatomic study using plastinated cross sections. Arthroscopy 24(3):258–263. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.030

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takakura Y, Kitada C, Sugimoto K, Tanaka Y, Tamai S (1991) Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Causes and results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:125–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ürgüden M, Bilbas H, Özdemir H, Söyüncü Y, Gür S, Aydin AT (2002) Tarsal tunnel syndrome–the effect of the associated features on outcome of surgery. Int Orthop 26:253–256. doi:10.1007/s00264-002-0351-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vasiliadis HS, Xenakis TA, Mitsionis G, Paschos N, Georgoulis A (2010) Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy 26(1):26–33. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams T, Robinson A (2009) Entrapment neuropathies of the foot and ankle. Orthoped Trauma 23(6):404–411. doi:10.1016/j.mporth.2009.09.004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ossama El Shazly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El Shazly, O., El Shazly, A., Desouky, A. et al. Anatomical bases of endoscopic tarsal tunnel release: anatomical and ultra-sonographic study with a preliminary clinical report. Surg Radiol Anat 33, 929–936 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0890-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0890-y

Keywords

Navigation