Skip to main content
Log in

Length of the first metatarsal and hallux in hallux valgus in the initial stage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to confirm whether the length of the first metatarsal and the length of the hallux are greater than normal in the initial phase of the hallux valgus deformity. In a sample of 152 radiographs (98 of normal feet and 54 of incipient hallux valgus feet), the length of the first metatarsal and the hallux was measured according to methods previously described. Comparisons were made between normal and hallux valgus feet, and between male and female feet. The results show significant differences between the two groups in the first metatarsal (P  <  0.0001) and hallux (P < 0.001). In the male feet, these differences are more marked (when comparing the length of the hallux between the female hallux valgus feet and the female normal feet, P > 0.05). This indicates that in men with hallux valgus, the excess in length of the first metatarso-digital segment is greater than in women that develop this deformity, at least in its initial phase. According to these results, the size of the first metatarso-digital segment could be involved in the development of the hallux valgus deformity.

Résumé

Le but de cette étude est de confirmer l’excès de longueur du premier métatarsiens et du gros orteil lors de la survenue d’une déformation en hallux valgus. Cent cinquante-deux radiographies ont été analysées, 98 pieds normaux, 54 pieds présentant un début d’hallux valgus. La longueur du premier métatarsien et de l’hallux ont été mesurées et la comparaison a été réalisée entre les deux variétés de pieds, et entre les hommes et les femmes. Les résultats de cette étude montrent qu’il existe une différence significative entre les deux groupes P < 0.0001 pour le premier métatarsien et p < 0.001 pour la longueur du gros orteil. Cette différence est beaucoup plus marquée chez l’homme que chez la femme. Cette étude montre donc que chez l’homme présentant un hallux valgus, l’excès de longueur du premier métatarsien et du gros orteil sont plus importants que chez la femme, au moins au début de la déformation. Ceci doit être pris en compte lors de la survenue d’un Hallux Valgus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bojsen-Möller F, Lamoreux L (1979) Significance of free dorsiflexion of the toes in walking. Acta Orthop Scand 50:471–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonney G, Macnab I (1952) Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. A critical survey of operative results. J Bone Joint Surg 34B:366–385

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coughlin MJ (1995) Juvenile hallux valgus: etiology and treatment. Foot Ankle Int 16:682–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA (2002) Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report on the Ad Hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society on Angular Measurements. Foot Ankle Int 23:68–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2003) Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 24:731–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davitt JS, Kadel N, Sangeorzan BJ, Hansen ST Jr, Holt SK, Donaldson-Fletcher E (2005) An association between functional second metatarsal length and midfoot arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg 87A:795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrari J, Hopkinson DA, Linney AD (2004) Size and shape differences between male and female foot bones. Is the female foot predisposed to hallux abducto valgus? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94:434–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giannestras NJ (1979) Hallux valgus y hallux rigidus. In: Giannestras NJ (ed) Trastornos del Pie. Salvat Editores, Barcelona, pp 345–401

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy RH, Clapham JC (1951) Observations on hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg 33B:376–391

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heden RI, Sorto LA (1981) The buckle point and the metatarsal protrusion´s relationship to hallux valgus. J Am Podiatr Assoc 71:200–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelikian H (1965) Hallux valgus, allied deformities of the forefoot and metatarsalgia. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lamur KS, Huson A, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R (1996) Geometric data of hallux valgus feet. Foot Ankle Int 17:548–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LaPorta DM, Melillo TV, Hetherington VJ (1994) Preoperative assessment in hallux valgus. In: Hetherington VJ (ed) Hallux valgus and forefoot surgery. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 07–123

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lundberg BJ, Sulja T (1972) Skeletal parameters in the hallux valgus foot. Acta Orthop Scand 43:576–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mann RA, Coughlin MJ (1981) Hallux valgus: etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. Clin Orthop 157:31–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piggott H (1960) The natural history of hallux valgus in adolescence and early adult life. J Bone Joint Surg 42B:749–760

    Google Scholar 

  17. Piqué C, Maled I, Arabi J, Vila J (2006) Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program. Foot Ankle Int 27:175–180

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roukis TS, Weil LS Jr, Weil LS Sr, Landsman AS (2005) Predicting articular erosion in hallux valgus: clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 44:13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith RW, Chairman P, Reynolds C, Stewart MJ (1984) Hallux valgus assessment: report of Research Committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle 5:92–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Soames RW (1998) Sistema esquelético. In: Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ (eds) Anatomía de Gray, tomo I, 38th edn. Ediciones Harcourt, Madrid, pp 425–736

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steel MW, Johnson KA, Dewitz MA, Ilstrup DM (1980) Radiographic measurements of the normal adult foot. Foot Ankle 1:151–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Kumai T, Samoto N, Tamai S (1995) Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus. A two-dimensional coordinate system. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:205–213

    Google Scholar 

  23. Viladot A (1973) Metatarsalgia due to biomechanical alterations of the forefoot. Orthop Clin North Am 4:65–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro V. Munuera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munuera, P.V., Polo, J. & Rebollo, J. Length of the first metatarsal and hallux in hallux valgus in the initial stage. International Orthopaedics (SICO 32, 489–495 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0350-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0350-9

Keywords

Navigation