Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The SRS-22 questionnaire is specifically designed for the assessment of quality of life in spinal deformity patients. This study is the first to use it to assess the quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace treatment and compares the results with an observational group matched by age and curve magnitude. Forty-six patients were enrolled into each group. Overall, it was found that patients under observation had a significantly better quality of life than braced patients. Specifically, the domains for function/activity and self-image were most affected. This effect was most apparent in those with a curve magnitude of under 20°. The scores did not improve significantly with the duration of brace wear, suggesting little adaptation. This study has implications for treatment, and more attention will need to be given to those with mild but progressive curves to help improve patients’ understanding of their treatment and hence their compliance and satisfaction.

Résumé

Le questionnaire SRS-22 est spécifiquement dévolu à l’évaluation de la qualité de vie chez les patients présentant une déformation rachidienne. Cette étude est la première qui utilise l’information relative à la qualité de vie des adolescents présentant une scoliose idiopathique, traitée par plâtre, en comparant ces résultats avec un groupe identique sur le plan de l’âge et de l’importance de la déformation. Quarante-six patients ont été étudiés dans chaque groupe. Il est évident que les patients sous simple surveillance ont une qualité de vie bien supérieure à ceux traités par plâtre. De façon spécifique, ce sont surtout les critères d’activité et d’image de soi-même qui sont les plus affectés. Cet effet est surtout apparent chez les patients dont la courbe est inférieure à 20°. Les scores ne s’améliorent pas avec le temps, ce qui aurait pu suggérer une petite adaptation. Cette étude a des implications sur le traitement et une attention particulière doit être apportée à tous les patients présentant une courbe d’aggravation progressive de façon à améliorer leur compréhension du traitement et améliorer leur compréhension, leur compliance et leur satisfaction vis-à-vis du traitement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D et al (2003) Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 28(1):74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC (2000) Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Instrument. Spine 25:2381–2386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickson JH, Mirkovic S, Noble PC et al (1995) Results of operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:513–523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fallstrom K, Cochran T, Nachemson A (1986) Long-term effects on personality of development in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Influence of type of treatment. Spine 11:756–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabos P, Bojescul J, Rich L et al (2002) Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in women treated with the Wilmington brace. Spine J 2(5)Supp 1:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty E et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of brace treatment on the incidence of surgery. Spine 26(1):42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gratz RR, Papalia-Finlay D (1984) Psychosocial adaptation to wearing the Milwaukee brace for scoliosis. A pilot study of dolescent females and their mothers. J Adolesc Health Care 5(4):237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM et al (1999) Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multi-centre study of 244 patients. Spine 24:1435–1440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karol LA (2001) Effectiveness of bracing in male patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(18):2001–2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz DE, Durrani AA (2001) Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(21):2354–2361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lonstein, Bradford, Winter, Ogilvie (1995) MOE’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 3rd edn. WB Saunders

  12. Maclean WE, Green NE, Pierre CB et al (1989) Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthop 9:257–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC et al (1997) Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17:712–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olafsson Y, Saraste H, Ahlgren RM (1999) Does bracing affect self-image? A prospective study on 54 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoiosis. Eur Spine J 8:402–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramirez N, Johnston CE, Browne RH (1997) The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:364–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ugwonali OF, Lomas G, Choe JC et al (2004) Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 4(3):254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vitale MG, Levy DE, Choe JC, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Roye DP (2001) Pediatric spine deformity: assessing patient outcomes and quality of life. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedics 68th Annual Meeting Proceedings vol. 2:547

  18. Weinstein S (2000) Bristol-myers squibb/zimmer award for distinguished achievement in orthopaedic research. Long-term follow-up of paediatric orthopaedic conditions. J Bone Joint Surg 82-A(7):980–990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson PL, Newton PO, Wenger DR (2002) A multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument. Spine 27(18):2036–2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Society for the Relief of Disabled Children, Sandy Bay, Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth M. C. Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, K.M.C., Cheng, E.Y.L., Chan, S.C.W. et al. Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 507–511 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0209-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0209-5

Keywords

Navigation