Skip to main content
Log in

Constrictive pericarditis at abdominal CT: a commonly overlooked diagnosis

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate findings at abdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients with proven constrictive pericarditis.

Methods

The medical records of 25 patients with surgically proven constrictive pericarditis and abdominal CT examinations within 30 days of operation were reviewed. Clinical symptoms, laboratory findings and prospective CT findings were collated. The CT examinations were also retrospectively reviewed in an unblinded fashion.

Results

Direct CT findings of constrictive pericarditis with an abnormal pericardium were present in 23/25 patients. Only 9 of 25 (36%) patients were detected prospectively. Findings on retrospective review included pericardial calcification (10/25, 40%) or thickening (13/25, 52%), dilated IVC (20/25), dilated hepatic veins (14/25), ascites (14/25), mesenteric soft tissue stranding (12/25), mottled enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma (8/25), and cirrhosis (6/25). Anemia was present in (17/25), and an elevated AST levels occurred in 48% (12/25) of patients. The most common abdominal symptoms were pain (4/12), diarrhea (4/12), distention (3/12), and bloating (1/12).

Conclusions

Constrictive pericarditis can present with vague abdominal symptoms. Anemia and elevated liver function tests are common laboratory abnormalities. Indirect CT findings of dilated IVC and/or hepatic veins, ascites, or cirrhosis should prompt inspection of the pericardium. In the majority of cases an abnormal pericardium could be identified (thickened, calcified or both).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pericarditis. In: http://www.medicinenet.com/pericarditis/article.htm., April 24, 2002

  2. Van der Merwe S, Dens J, Daenen W, et al. (2000) Pericardial disease is often not recognized as a cause of chronic severe ascites. J Hepatol 32(1):164–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Benedetti E, Didier D (2000) Images in clinical medicine. Constrictive pericarditis. N Engl J Med 343(2):107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glockner JF (2003) Imaging of pericardial disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 11(1):149–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karia DH, Xing YO, Kuvin JT, et al. (2002) Recent role of imaging in the diagnosis of pericardial disease (review). Curr Cardiol Rep 4(1):33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, et al. (2003) CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. RadioGraphics 23:S167–S180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK, et al. (2003) Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation 108(15):1852–1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this paper would like to thank Ms. Debora Shreve for her help preparing this manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Daniel Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, K.T., Julsrud, P.R. & Johnson, C.D. Constrictive pericarditis at abdominal CT: a commonly overlooked diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 33, 349–352 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9246-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9246-9

Keywords

Navigation