Skip to main content
Log in

Infarct size in primary angioplasty without on-site cardiac surgical backup versus transferal to a tertiary center: a single photon emission computed tomography study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed in large community hospitals without cardiac surgery back-up facilities (off-site) reduces door-to-balloon time compared with emergency transferal to tertiary interventional centers (on-site). The present study was performed to explore whether off-site PCI for acute myocardial infarction results in reduced infarct size.

Methods and results

One hundred twenty-eight patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to undergo primary PCI at the off-site center (n = 68) or to transferal to an on-site center (n = 60). Three days after PCI, 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT was performed to estimate infarct size. Off-site PCI significantly reduced door-to-balloon time compared with on-site PCI (94 ± 54 versus 125 ± 59 min, respectively, p < 0.01), although symptoms-to-treatment time was only insignificantly reduced (257 ± 211 versus 286 ± 146 min, respectively, p = 0.39). Infarct size was comparable between treatment centers (16 ± 15 versus 14 ± 12%, respectively p = 0.35). Multivariate analysis revealed that TIMI 0/1 flow grade at initial coronary angiography (OR 3.125, 95% CI 1.17–8.33, p = 0.023), anterior wall localization of the myocardial infarction (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.38–8.55, p < 0.01), and development of pathological Q-waves (OR 5.07, 95% CI 2.10–12.25, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of an infarct size > 12%.

Conclusions

Off-site PCI reduces door-to-balloon time compared with transferal to a remote on-site interventional center but does not reduce infarct size. Instead, pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 flow, anterior wall infarct localization, and development of Q-waves are more important predictors of infarct size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keeley EC, Hillis LD. Primary PCI for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P, Montalescot G. Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2003;108:1809–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:733–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial–PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:94–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peels HO, de Swart H, Ploeg TV, Hautvast RW, Cornel JH, Arnold AE, et al. Coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wharton TP Jr., Grines LL, Turco MA, Johnston JD, Souther J, Lew DC, et al. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site (the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1943–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Boer MJ, Bronzwaer JG, Boers M. Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgical backup. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation 2004;109:1223–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiele H, Kappl MJ, Linke A, Erbs S, Boudriot E, Lembcke A, et al. Influence of time-to-treatment, TIMI-flow grades, and ST-segment resolution on infarct size and infarct transmurality as assessed by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, Curtis JP, Bradley EH, Magid DJ, et al. Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wharton TP Jr. Should patients with acute myocardial infraction be transferred to a tertiary center for primary angioplasty or receive it at qualified hospitals in community? The case for community hospital angioplasty. Circulation 2005;112:3509–20, discussion 3534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nallamothu BK, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM. Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1631–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Hornke M, Bulow HP, Dirschinger J, Schomig A, et al. Quantitative measurement of infarct size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging early after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-sestamibi. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:544–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Antman EM, McCabe CH, Gurfinkel EP, Turpie AG, Bernink PJ, Salein D, et al. Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial. Circulation 1999;100:1593–601.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;56:786–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boersma E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet. 1996;348:771–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, Shoultz DA, Levy D, French WJ, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2000;283:2941–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brodie BR, Stone GW, Cox DA, Stuckey TD, Turco M, Tcheng JE, et al. Impact of treatment delays on outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the CADILLAC trial. Am Heart J. 2006;151:1231–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Wall TC, Kissling G, Hansen CJ, Muncy DB, et al. Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1312–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, Brodie BR, Morice MC, Griffin J, et al. Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Circulation 2001;104:636–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ndrepepa G, Kastrati A, Schwaiger M, Mehilli J, Markwardt C, Dibra A, et al. Relationship between residual blood flow in the infarct-related artery and scintigraphic infarct size, myocardial salvage, and functional recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1782–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stone GW, Dixon SR, Grines CL, Cox DA, Webb JG, Brodie BR, et al. Predictors of infarct size after primary coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction from pooled analysis from four contemporary trials. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1370–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet. 2006;367:579–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liem A, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H, de Boer MJ, et al. High dose heparin as pretreatment for primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the Heparin in Early Patency (HEAP) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:600–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, Ecollan P, Elhadad S, Villain P, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1895–903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone PH, Raabe DS, Jaffe AS, Gustafson N, Muller JE, Turi ZG, et al. Prognostic significance of location and type of myocardial infarction: independent adverse outcome associated with anterior location. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:453–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aguirre FV, Younis LT, Chaitman BR, Ross AM, McMahon RP, Kern MJ, et al. Early and 1-year clinical outcome of patients’ evolving non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results from The TIMI II Study. Circulation 1995;91:2541–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Parsons L, de Lemos JA, Cannon CP, Giugliano RP, et al. Application of the TIMI risk score for ST-elevation MI in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. JAMA. 2001;286:1356–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moon JC, De Arenaza DP, Elkington AG, Taneja AK, John AS, Wang D, et al. The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:554–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, Barton BA, Webster TR, Mattera JA, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2308–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1121–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor A. W. M. Umans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knaapen, P., de Mulder, M., van der Zant, F.M. et al. Infarct size in primary angioplasty without on-site cardiac surgical backup versus transferal to a tertiary center: a single photon emission computed tomography study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36, 237–243 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0917-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0917-8

Keywords

Navigation