Abstract
Objective
To determine the discriminative validity and reliability of the evidence base using meta-analysis.
Materials and Methods
A review of published sources using the databases AMED, CINHAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library, and for unpublished material was conducted. All studies assessing the reliability, validity, sensitivity or specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) of the patellofemoral joint of patients following patellar dislocation, subluxation or instability, were included. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the difference in radiological measurements between healthy controls and subjects with patellar instability in order to assess discrimination validity. A narrative assessment was used to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability as well as the sensitivity and specificity of specific radiological measurements.
Results
A total of 27 studies were reviewed. The findings indicated that there was acceptable inter-observer and intra-observer reliability and validity for different methods of assessing patellar height and the sulcus angle with X-ray, MRI and CT methods, and the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) assessed using CT. There was poor reliability or validity for the assessment of severity of trochlear dysplasia and the sulcus angle using US.
Conclusion
There is insufficient evidence to determine the reliability, validity, sensitivity or specificity of tests such as the congruence angle, lateral patellar displacement, lateral patellar tilt, trochlear depth, boss height, the crossing sign or Wiberg patellar classification. A critical appraisal of the literature identified a number of recurrent methodological limitations. Further study is recommended to evaluate the reliability and validity of these radiological outcomes using well-designed radiological trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sport Med. 2004;32:1114–21.
Atkin DM, Fithian DC, Marangi KS, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Mendelsohn C. Characteristics of patients with primary acute lateral patellar dislocation and their recovery within the first 6 months on injury. Am J Sport Med. 2000;28:472–9.
Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, Sevavongse W, Thomas NP. Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee. 2003;10:215–20.
Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2:19–26.
Woo R, Busch MT. Management of patellar instability in children. Oper Tech Sports Med. 1998;6:247–58.
Grelsamer RP. Patellar malalignment. J Bone Jt Surg. 2000;82-A:1639–50.
Toms AP, Cahir J, Swift L, Donell ST. Imaging the femoral sulcus with ultrasound, CT, and MRI: reliability and generalizability in patients with patellar instability. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:329–38.
Kujala UM, Österman K, Kormano M, Nelimarkka O, Hurme M, Taimela S. Patellofemoral relationships in recurrent patellar dislocation. J Bone Jt Surg. 1989;71-B:788–92.
Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Nelimarkka O, Komu M, Kujala UM. Magnetic resonance imaging of patellofemoral relationships. Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22:403–10.
Vähäsarja V, Lanning P, Lähde S, Serlo W. Axial radiography or CT in the measurement of patellofemoral malalignment indices in children and adolescents? Clin Radiol. 1996;51:639–43.
Galland O, Walch G, Dejour H, Carret JP. An anatomical and radiological study of the femoropatellar articulation. Surg Radiol Anat. 1990;12:119–25.
Polgar S, Thomas SA. Introduction to research in the health sciences. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
Aldridge A, Levine K. Surveying the social world. Principles and practice in survey research. Buckingham, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Buckingham A, Saunders P. The survey methods handbook. Cambridge, UK: Polity; 2004.
Chow SC, Liu JP. Design and analysis of clinical trials. Concepts and methodologies. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2004.
Haim A, Yaniv M, Dekel S, Amir H. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: validity of clinical and radiological features. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:223–8.
Beaconsfield T, Pintore E, Maffulli N, Petri GJ. Radiological measurements in patellofemoral disorders. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;308:18–28.
CASP (Critical Skills Appraisal Programme). Oxford, UK: Learning & Development Public Health Resource Unit; 2007. Available from: http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/critical_appraisal_tools.htm. Accessed 5 January 2010.
Bland M. Introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chichester: Wiley; 2002.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.
Seyahi A, Atalar AC, Koyuncu LO, Cinar BM, Demirhan M. Blumensaat line and patellar height. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2006;40:240–7.
Harman M, Dogan A, Arslan H, Ipeksoy U, Vural S. Evaluation of the patellofemoral joint with kinematic MR fluoroscopy. J Clin Imaging. 2002;26:136–9.
Rémy F, Chantelot C, Fontaine C, Demondion X, Migaud H, Gougeon F. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in radiologic diagnosis and classification of femoral trochlear dysplasia. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20:285–9.
Barnett AJ, Prentice M, Mandalia V, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JDJ. Patellar height measurement in trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1412–5.
Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H. Patella infera. A propos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1982;68:317.
Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101:101–4.
Blackburne JS, Peel TE. A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Jt Surg. 1977;59-B:241–2.
Barnett AJ, Gardner ROE, Lankester BJA, Wakely CJ, Eldridge JDJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the patella. A comparison of the morphology of the patella in normal and dysplastic knees. J Bone Jt Surg. 2007;89-B:761–5.
Escala JS, Mellado JM, Olona M, Gine J, Sauri A, Neyret P. Objective patellar instability: MR-based quantitative assessment of potentially associated anatomical features. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:264–72.
Teitge RA, Faerber WDO, Des Madryl PRT, Matelic TM. Stress radiographs of the patellofemoral joint. J Bone Jt Surg. 1996;78-A:193–203.
Wagenaar F-CBM, Koëter S, Anderson PG, Wymenga AB. Conventional radiography cannot replace CT scanning in detecting tibial tubercle lateralisation. Knee. 2007;14:51–4.
Davies AP, Costa ML, Donell ST, Glasgow MM, Shepstone L. The sulcus angle and malaligment of the extensor mechanism of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg. 2000;82-B:1162–6.
Urch SE, Trittle BA, Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Axial linear patellar displacement. A new measurement of patellofemoral congruence. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:970–3.
Biedert RM, Albrecht S. The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:707–12.
Dejour H, Walch G, Neyret P, Adeleine P. La dysplasia de la trochlée fémorale. Rev Chir Orthop. 1990;76:45–54.
Walch G, Dejour H. La radiologie dans la pathologie fémoro-patellaire. Acta Orthop Belg. 1989;55:371–80.
Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann CWA, Fucentese SF, Romero J. The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee. 2006;13:26–31.
Lustig S, Servien E, Selmi AS, Neyret P. Factors affecting reliability of TT-TG measurements before and after medialization: a CT scan study. Rev Chir Orthop. 2007;92:429–36.
Biedert RM, Bachmann M. Anterior-posterior trochlear measurements of normal and dysplasic trochlea by axial magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1225–30.
Seil R, Müller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S. Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol. 2000;8:231–6.
Koëter S, Horstmann WG, Wagenaar F-CBM, Huysse W, Wymenga AB, Anderson PG. A new CT scan method for measuring the tibial tubercle trochlear groove distance in patellar instability. Knee. 2007;14:128–32.
Inoue M, Shino K, Hirose H, Horibe S, Ono K. Subluxation of the patella. Computed tomography analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Jt Surg. 1988;70-A:1331–7.
Murray TF, Dupont J-Y, Fulkerson JP. Axial and lateral radiographs in evaluating patellofemoral malalignment. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:580–4.
Nove-Josserand L, Dejour D. Quadriceps dysplasia and patellar tilt in objective patellar instability. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995;81:497–504.
Neyret P, Robinson AH, Le Coultre B, Lapra C, Chambat P. Patellar tendon length—–the factor in patellar instability? Knee. 2002;9:3–6.
Laurin CA, Lévesque HP, Dussault R, LaBelle H, Peides JP. The abnormal lateral patellofemoral angle. J Bone Jt Surg. 1978;60-A:55–60.
Dupont J-Y, Guier CA. Comparison of three standard radiologic techniques for screening of patellar subluxations. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21:389–401.
Dowd GSE, Bentley G. Radiographic assessment in patellar instability and chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Jt Surg. 1986;68-B:297–300.
Fukui N, Nakagawa T, Murakami S, Hiraoka H, Nakamura K. A modified system of stress radiography for patellofemoral instability. J Bone Jt Surg. 2003;85-B:1128–33.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Sir Thomas Browne Library at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital for their assistance in gathering the articles used in this paper. We also thank the corresponding authors who reviewed the search results, and in particularly Dr Seppo Koskinen, Helsinki University Hospital, for providing additional data used in the meta-analysis.
Funding
None
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
None required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, T.O., Davies, L., Toms, A.P. et al. The reliability and validity of radiological assessment for patellar instability. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 40, 399–414 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0961-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0961-x