Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound evaluation of foot deformities in infants

  • Review
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foot deformity in infants is the most common congenital musculoskeletal condition. A precise diagnosis can sometimes be impossible to establish clinically. Radiologic imaging plays a major role in the evaluation of musculoskeletal abnormalities. However conventional imaging techniques, such as plain radiographs of the foot, are of very little help in this age group because of the lack of ossification of the tarsal bones. US presents a significant advantage because it permits the visualization of cartilaginous structures. This leads to the detailed assessment of foot deformities in infants. Furthermore, US can also be used as a dynamic imaging modality. Different scanning views are beneficial to evaluate the complete anatomy of the foot; depending on the suspected clinical diagnosis, some planes are more informative to display the pathological features of a specific deformity. We describe the US findings of five of the most common foot deformities referred to our pediatric orthopedic clinic (clubfoot, simple metatarsus adductus, skewfoot, and oblique and vertical talus). For each deformity we propose a specific imaging protocol based on US to provide an accurate diagnosis. US is a complementary tool to the clinical examination for determining the diagnosis and the severity of the deformity and also for monitoring the efficacy of treatment. Radiologists investigating foot deformities in infants should consider using US for the detailed assessment of the foot in this age group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL (2006) Lovell and Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herring JA (2008) Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics. From the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA (2009) Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1146–1153

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wynne-Davies R (1964) Family studies and the cause of congenital clubfoot. Talipes equinovarus, talipes calcaneovalgus and metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 46:445–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodwell E, Risoe P, Wright J (2013) A prospective determination of environmental factors associated with clubfoot (poster). Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) Annual Meeting, Toronto

  6. Diméglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P et al (1995) Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pirani S, Hodges D, Sekeramayi F (2008) A reliable and valid method of assessing the amount of deformity in the congenital clubfoot deformity. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aitken JT, Causey G, Joseph J et al (1966) The foot. In: Aitken JT, Causey G, Joseph J, Young JZ (eds) A manual of human anatomy. Vol IV, Lower limb, 2nd edn. E&S Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tolat V, Boothroyd A, Carty H et al (1995) Ultrasound: a helpful guide in the treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maiza D, Themar-Noel C, Legrand I et al (1995) Ultrasonographic approach to the neonatal foot: preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:123–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamel J, Becker W (1996) Sonographic assessment of clubfoot deformity in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B 5:279–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chami M, Daoud A, Maestro M et al (1996) Ultrasound contribution in the analysis of the newborn and infant normal and clubfoot: a preliminary study. Pediatr Radiol 26:298–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson G, Aurell Y (2002) Use of ultrasonography prior to surgery for assessment of clubfoot anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:112

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G et al (2002) Ultrasound anatomy in the neonatal clubfoot. Eur Radiol 12:2509–2517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G et al (2002) Ultrasound anatomy in the normal neonatal and infant foot: an anatomic introduction to ultrasound assessment of foot deformities. Eur Radiol 12:2306–2312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuhns LR, Koujok K, Hall JM et al (2003) Ultrasound of the navicular during the simulated Ponseti maneuver. J Pediatr Orthop 23:243–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gigante C, Talenti E, Turra S (2004) Sonographic assessment of clubfoot. J Clin Ultrasound 32:235–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suda R, Suda AJ, Grill F (2006) Sonographic classification of idiopathic clubfoot according to severity. J Pediatr Orthop B 15:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiels WE 2nd, Coley BD, Kean J et al (2007) Focused dynamic sonographic examination of the congenital clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 37:1118–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aurell Y, Andriesse H, Johansson A et al (2005) Ultrasound assessment of early clubfoot treatment: a comparison of the Ponseti method and a modified Copenhagen method. J Pediatr Orthop B 14:347–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ponseti V (1992) Treatment of congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:448–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Radler C, Manner HM, Suda R et al (2007) Radiographic evaluation of idiopathic clubfeet undergoing Ponseti treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Desai S, Aroojis A, Mehta R (2008) Ultrasound evaluation of clubfoot correction during Ponseti treatment: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 28:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Adwar KL, Taha Kotb H (2010) The role of ultrasound in clubfoot treatment: correlation with the Pirani score and assessment of the Ponseti method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2495–2506

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal A, Qureshi NA, Kumar P et al (2012) Ultrasonographic evaluation of Achilles tendons in clubfeet before and after percutaneous tenotomy. J Orthop Surg 20:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marleix S, Chapuis M, Fraisse B et al (2012) Idiopathic club foot treated with the Ponseti method. Clinical and sonographic evaluation of Achilles tendon tenotomy. A review of 221 club feet. Orthop Traumato Surg Res 98:S73–S76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Niki H, Nakajima H, Hiramo T et al (2013) Ultrasonographic observation of the healing process in the gap after a Ponseti-type Achilles tenotomy for idiopathic congenital clubfoot at two-year follow-up. J Orthop Sci 18:70–75

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coley BD, Shiels WE 2nd, Kean J et al (2007) Age-dependent dynamic sonographic measurement of pediatric clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 37:1125–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aurell Y, Adlercreutz C, Andriesse H et al (2004) Repeatability of sonographic measurements in clubfeet. Acta Radiol 45:622–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ponseti V (1996) Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  31. Katz DA, Albanese EL, Levinsohn EM et al (2003) Pulsed color-flow Doppler analysis of arterial deficiency in idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 23:84–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Greene WB (1994) Metatarsus adductus and skewfoot. Instr Course Lect 43:161–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lepow GM, Lepow RS, Lepow RM et al (1987) Pediatric metatarsus adductus angle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 77:529–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Berg EE (1986) A reappraisal of metatarsus adductus and skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1185–1196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cavalier R, Lipton GE, Bowen JR (1997) Radiologic case study. Skewfoot. Orthopedics 20:728–736

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hutchinson B (2010) Pediatric metatarsus adductus and skewfoot deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 27:93–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bleck EE (1983) Metatarsus adductus: classification and relationship to outcomes of treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 3:2–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mosca VS (1992) Flexible flatfoot and skewfoot. In: Drennan JC (ed) The child's foot and ankle. Raven, New York, pp 355–376

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE et al (1988) Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:407–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cook DA, Breed AL, Cook T et al (1992) Observer variability in the radiographic measurement and classification of metatarsus adductus. J Pediatr Orthop 12:86–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dawoodi AI, Perera A (2012) Radiological assessment of metatarsus adductus. Foot Ankle Surg 18:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hunziker UA, Largo RH, Duc G (1988) Neonatal metatarsus adductus, joint mobility, axis and rotation of the lower extremity in preterm and term children 0–5 years of age. Eur J Pediatr 148:19–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kite JH (1967) Congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:388–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Peabody CW, Muro F (1933) Congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 15:171–189

    Google Scholar 

  45. McCormick DW, Blount WR (1949) Metatarsus adductovarus: skewfoot. J Am Med Assoc 141:449–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Napiontek M (2002) Skewfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 22:130–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hagmann S, Dreher T, Wenz W (2009) Skewfoot. Foot Ankle Clin 14:409–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jawish R, Rigault P, Padovani JP et al (1990) The Z-shaped or serpentine foot in children and adolescents. Chir Pediatr 31:314–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wan SC (2006) Metatarsus adductus and skewfoot deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 23:23–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Peterson HA (1986) Skewfoot (forefoot adduction with heel valgus). J Pediatr Orthop 6:24–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hubbard AM, Davidson RS, Meyer JS et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:389–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. McKie J, Radomisli T (2010) Congenital vertical talus: a review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 27:145–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Alaee F, Boehm S, Dobbs MB (2007) A new approach to the treatment of congenital vertical talus. J Child Orthop 1:165–174

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Benard MA (2000) Congenital vertical talus. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 17:471–480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jacobsen ST, Crawford AH (1983) Congenital vertical talus. J Pediatr Orthop 3:306–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kumar SJ, Cowell H, Ramsey PL (1982) Vertical and oblique talus. Instr Course Lect 31:235–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Harris EJ (2000) The oblique talus deformity. What is it, and what is its clinical significance in the scheme of pronatory deformities? Clin Podiatr Med Surg 17:419–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schlesinger AE, Deeney VF, Caskey PF (1989) Sonography of the nonossified tarsal navicular cartilage in an infant with congenital vertical talus. Pediatr Radiol 20:134–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Supakul N, Loder RT, Karmazyn B (2013) Dynamic US study in the evaluation of infants with vertical or oblique talus deformities. Pediatr Radiol 43:376–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Violas P, Chapuis M, Tréguier C et al (2006) Ultrasound: a helpful technique in the analysis of congenital vertical talus. A case report. J Pediatr Orthop B 15:70–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Dobbs MB, Purrell DB, Nunley R et al (2006) Early results of a new method of treatment for idiopathic congenital vertical talus. J Bone Surg Am 88:1192–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ramy El-Jalbout, MD, Laurent Garel, MD, and Alain Sirard, MD, for perusing the draft of this work, Madeleine Leduc for the medical illustrations, Stephane Dedelis for the image processing, and Liette Bigras for the technical support.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Claude Miron.

Additional information

CME activity

This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit the SPR Web site at www.pedrad.org on the Education page and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miron, MC., Grimard, G. Ultrasound evaluation of foot deformities in infants. Pediatr Radiol 46, 193–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3460-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3460-3

Keywords

Navigation