Abstract
The timing, type, and technique of imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children are all debated. This debate is both local and international. The fact is that choices in imaging evaluation will depend on both local and national influences, which are reasonable and to be expected. There still is a responsibility, though, for those involved with evaluation of patients with possible appendicitis to come to agreement about an appropriate diagnostic pathway that considers standards of care and available resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94
Sivit CJ (2004) Imaging the child with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: current concepts. Pediatr Radiol 34:447–453
Taylor GA (2004) Suspected appendicitis in children: in search of the single best diagnostic test. Radiology 231:293–295
Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Stallion A et al (2000) Imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in a pediatric population: effectiveness of sonography versus CT. AJR 175:977–980
Pena BM, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ et al (2002) Effect of an imaging protocol on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with appendicitis. Pediatrics 110:1088–1093
Lee JH, Jeong YK, Hwang JC et al (2002) Graded compression sonography with adjuvant use of a posterior manual compression technique in the sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. AJR 178:863–868
Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel CA et al (2005) Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality. Pediatr Radiol 35:392–395
Callahan MJ, Rodriguez DP, Taylor GA (2002) How I do it: CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 224:325–332
Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkney LP et al (2001) Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 220:691–695
Kharbanda AB, Taylor GA, Bachur RG (2007) Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 243:520–526
Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP et al (2001) Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. AJR 176:37–41
Lowe LH, Perez R, Scheker LE et al (2001) Appendicitis and alternate diagnoses in children: findings on unenhanced limited helical CT. Pediatr Radiol 31:569–577
Sung T, Callahan MJ, Taylor GA (2006) Clinical and imaging mimickers of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. AJR 186:67–74
Morrow SE, Newman KD (2007) Current management of appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:34–30
Taylor GA, Callahan MJ, Rodriguez D et al (2006) CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors. Pediatr Radiol 36:331–337
Lee CI, Foreman HP (2007) The hidden costs of CT bioeffects. J Am Coll Radiol 5:78–79
Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804
Tsao K, St Peter SD, Valusek PA et al (2008) Management of pediatric acute appendicitis in the computed tomographic era. J Surg Res 147:221–224
Klein MD (2007) Clinical approach to a child with abdominal pain who might have appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 37:11–14
Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR 169:1275–1280
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA et al (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144
Coley B (2007) Appendicitis in children: one radiologist’s perspective. Pediatr Radiol 37:1–3
Seelig MG (1927) Introduction to American edition. In: Bertwistle AP, Shenton EW (eds) A descriptive atlas of visceral radiograms. CV Mosby, St. Louis
Frush DS, Frush KS (2008) The ALARA concept in pediatric imaging: building bridges between radiology and emergency medicine: consensus conference on imaging safety and quality for children in the emergency setting, 23–24 February 2008, Orlando, FL. Executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 4):S629–S632
Frush DS, Frush KS (2008) Panel discussion. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 4):S728–S734
Frush DS, Frush KS (2008) ‘Sleeping with the enemy?’ Expectations and reality in imaging children in the emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 4):S633–S638
Frush DP (2006) Categorical course in physics: radiation dose and image quality for pediatric CT: clinical considerations. Radiological Society of North America, pp 167–182
Acosta R, Crain EF, Goldman HS (2005) CT can reduce hospitalization for observation in children with suspected appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 35:495–500
Nance ML, Adamson WT, Hedrick HL (2000) Appendicitis in the young child: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Pediatr Emerg Care 16:160–162
Alloo J, Gerstle T, Shilyansky J et al (2004) Appendicitis in children less than 3 years of age: a 28-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 19:777–779
Selbst SM (2008) Standards for clinical evaluation and documentation by the emergency medicine provider. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 4):S645–S650
Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Mor-Yosef D et al (2008) Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up. AJR 190:1300–1306
Doria AS, Amernic H, Dick P et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shifts for assessment of appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 35:1186–1195
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frush, D.P., Frush, K.S. & Oldham, K.T. Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A North American perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39, 500–505 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1131-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1131-3