Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space–number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Attentional-SNARC effect (Att-SNARC) originally described by Fischer et al. (Nat Neurosci 6(6):555, 2003), consists of faster RTs to visual targets in the left side of space when these are preceded by small-magnitude Arabic cues at central fixation and by faster RTs to targets in the right side of space when these are preceded by large-magnitude cues. Verifying the consistency and reliability of this effect is important, because the effect would suggest an inherent association between the representation of space and that of number magnitude, while a number of recent studies provided no positive evidence in favour of the Att-SNARC and the inherency of this association (van Dijck et al. in Q J Exp Psychol 67(8):1500–1513, 2014; Zanolie and Pecher in Front Psychol 5:987, 2014; Fattorini et al. in Cortex 73:298–316, 2015; Pinto et al. in Cortex, DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.015, 2018). Here, we re-analysed Att-SNARC data that we have collected in 174 participants over different studies run in our laboratory. Most important, in a subsample of 79 participants, we also verified whether the strength and reliability of the Att-SNARC is eventually linked inter-individual variations in finger counting style, imagery vividness, and verbal/visual learning style. We found no evidence for the Att-SNARC effect or for the influence of finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style on its direction or consistency. These results confirm no inherent link between orienting of spatial attention and representation of number magnitudes. We propose that this link is rather determined by the joint use of spatial and number magnitude or parity codes in the performance of the numerical task at hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse E, van Dijck JP, Fias W (2016) How does working memory enable number-induced spatial biases? Front Psychol 7:977

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aiello M, Jacquin-Courtois S, Merola S, Ottaviani T, Tomaiuolo F, Bueti D, Rossetti Y, Doricchi F (2012) No inherent left and right side in human ‘mental number line’: evidence from right brain damage. Brain 135(8):2492–2505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aiello M, Merola S, Doricchi F (2013) Small numbers in the right brain: evidence from patients without and with spatial neglect. Cortex 49(1):348–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaranelli C (2007) Analisi dei dati: tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicologica e sociale. Edizioni universitarie di lettere economia diritto

  • Berch DB, Foley EJ, Hill RJ, Ryan PM (1999) Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. J Exp Child Psychol 74:286–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertillon J (1880) De la vision des nombres. La Nature 378:196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertillon J (1881) De la vision et la mémoire des nombres. La Nature 408:202–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertillon J (1882) De la vision des nombres. La Nature 428:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J (1990) Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16(3):626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psych 122(3):371–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371

  • Dodd MD, Van der Stigchel S, Leghari MA, Fung G, Kingstone A (2008) Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition 108(3):810–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doricchi F, Guariglia P, Gasparini M, Tomaiuolo F (2005) Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nat Neurosci 8(12):1663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doricchi F, Merola S, Aiello M, Guariglia P, Bruschini M, Gevers W, Gasparini M, Tomaiuolo F (2009) Spatial orienting biases in the decimal numeral system. Curr Biol 19(8):682–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman DM (2009) The objectification of overlearned sequences: a new view of spatial sequence synesthesia. Cortex 45(10):1266–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fattorini E, Pinto M, Rotondaro F, Doricchi F (2015) Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention. Cortex 73:298–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fattorini E, Pinto M, Merola S, D’Onofrio M, Doricchi F (2016) On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence. Progress Brain Res 227:223–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fias W (1996) The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Math Cognit 2(1):95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fias W, van Dijck JP (2016) The temporary nature of number–space interactions. Can J Exp Psychol 70(1):33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fias W, van Dijck JP, Gevers W (2011) How is number associated with space? The role of working memory. In: Space, time and number in the brain. Academic Press, pp 133–148

  • Fischer MH, Knops A (2014) Attentional cueing in numerical cognition. Front Psychol 5:1381

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Shaki S (2017) Implicit spatial-numerical associations: negative numbers and the role of counting direction. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 43(4):639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Castel AD, Dodd MD, Pratt J (2003) Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nat Neurosci 6(6):555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galfano G, Rusconi E, Umiltà C (2006) Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will. Psychon Bull Rev 13(5):869–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galton F (1880a) Visualised numerals. Nature 21:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton F (1880b) Visualised numerals. Nature 21:494–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers W, Santens S, Dhooge E, Chen Q, Van den Bossche L, Fias W, Verguts T (2010) Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number–space interactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 139(1):180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg V, Gevers W (2015) Spatial coding of ordinal information in short-and long-term memory. Frontiers in human neuroscience 9:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Shaki S, Fischer MH (2011) The cultural number line: a review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. J Cross Cult Psychol 42(4):543–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffaux V, Martin R, Dormal G, Goebel R, Schiltz C (2012) Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia 50(14):3419–3428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guida A, Campitelli G (2019) Explaining the SPoARC and SNARC effects with knowledge structures: an expertise account. Psychon Bull Rev 26(2):434–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey BM, Klein BP, Petridou N, Dumoulin SO (2013) Topographic representation of numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science 341(6150):1123–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard EM, Piazza M, Pinel P, Dehaene S (2005) Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(6):435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber S, Klein E, Moeller K, Willmes K (2016) Spatial-numerical and ordinal positional associations coexist in parallel. Front Psychol 7:438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ito Y, Hatta T (2004) Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect. Mem Cognit 32(4):662–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JASP Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.10.0) [Computer software]

  • Kadosh RC, Lammertyn J, Izard V (2008) Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Prog Neurobiol 84(2):132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby JR, Moore PJ, Schofield NJ (1988) Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemp Educ Psychol 13(2):169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann O, Alipour A, Fischer MH (2011) Finger counting habits in middle eastern and western individuals: an online survey. J Cross Cult Psychol 42(4):566–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loetscher T, Brugger P (2009) Random number generation in neglect patients reveals enhanced response stereotypy, but no neglect in number space. Neuropsychologia 47(1):276–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loetscher T, Nicholls ME, Towse JN, Bradshaw JL, Brugger P (2010) Lucky numbers: spatial neglect affects physical, but not representational, choices in a lotto task. Cortex 46(5):685–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch RF, Myers JL (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16(1):149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV (1970) Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika 57(3):519–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV (1974) Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhyā:Indian J Stat Ser B 36:115–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks DF (1973) Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ)

  • Pia L, Neppi-Mòdona M, Cremasco L, Gindri P, Dal Monte O, Folegatti A (2012) Functional independence between numerical and visual space: evidence from right brain-damaged patients. Cortex 48(10):1351–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto M, Lasaponara S, Fattorini E, Bueti D, Macaluso E, Doricchi F (2017) How the cognitive processing of numerical cues modulates the number–space interaction: ERPs and fMRI studies. Poster presented at European Workshop of Cognitive Neuroscience (EWCN), Brixen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto M, Fattorini E, Lasaponara S, D’Onofrio M, Fortunato G, Doricchi F (2018) Visualising numerals: a ERPs study with the Attentional SNARC task. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto M, Pellegrino M, Marson F, Lasaponara S, Doricchi F (2019) Reconstructing the origins of the space–number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines. Cognition 190:143–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Cho YS (2006) Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychol Bull 132(3):416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranzini M, Dehaene S, Piazza M, Hubbard EM (2009) Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues. Neuropsychologia 47:2615–2624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T, Marcoulides GA (2012) An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic J, Wright A, Kingstone A (2006) The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychon Bull Rev 13(5):862–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti Y, Jacquin-Courtois S, Aiello M, Ishihara M, Brozzoli C, Doricchi F (2011) Neglect “around the clock”: Dissociating number and spatial neglect in right brain damage. Space, Time Number Brain 149–173 Academic Press

  • Rotondaro F, Merola S, Aiello M, Pinto M, Doricchi F (2015) Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia 75:565–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sagiv N, Simner J, Collins J, Butterworth B, Ward J (2006) What is the relationship between synaesthesia and visuo-spatial number forms? Cognition 101(1):114–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santens S, Gevers W (2008) The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition 108(1):263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller AM, Hoffmann D, Goffaux V, Schiltz C (2015) Shifts of spatial attention cued by irrelevant numbers: Electrophysiological evidence from a target discrimination task. J Cognit Psychol 27(4):442–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seron X, Pesenti M, Noël MP, Deloche G, Cornet JA (1992) Images of numbers, or “When 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue”. Cognition 44(1):159–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaki S, Fischer MH (2008) Reading space into numbers—a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition 108(2):590–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaki S, Fischer MH, Petrusic WM (2009) Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev 16(2):328–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB (2007) Using multivariate statistics, vol 5. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck JP, Fias W (2011) A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition 119(1):114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck JP, Gevers W, Lafosse C, Doricchi F, Fias W (2011) Non-spatial neglect for the mental number line. Neuropsychologia 49(9):2570–2583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck JP, Gevers W, Lafosse C, Fias W (2012) The heterogeneous nature of number–space interactions. Frontiers in human neuroscience 5:182

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck JP, Abrahamse EL, Majerus S, Fias W (2013) Spatial attention interacts with serial-order retrieval from verbal working memory. Psychol Sci 24(9):1854–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck JP, Abrahamse EL, Acar F, Ketels B, Fias W (2014) A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention. Q J Exp Psychol 67(8):1500–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G, Willmes K, Nuerk HC, Fischer MH (2008) On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychol Sci Q 50(4):489

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanolie K, Pecher D (2014) Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study. Front Psychol 5:987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zebian S (2005) Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. J Cognit Cult 5(1–2):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank for help in data collection Francesco Caligiuri, Marzia De Gasperis, and Ludovica Caratelli. This work was supported by grants PRIN-MIUR 2017 (no. 2017XBJN4F) and “Ricerche di Ateneo” University La Sapienza 2018 to FD. M.P. was supported by a research grant from the Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome. M. Pellegrino was supported by the PhD Program in Behavioral Neuroscience-University La Sapienza, Rome.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michele Pellegrino and Mario Pinto have equally contributed to the study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Psicologia 39, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Michele Pellegrino, Stefano Lasaponara, Clelia Rossi-Arnaud, Vincenzo Cestari & Fabrizio Doricchi

  2. Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy

    Mario Pinto & Fabrizio Doricchi

  3. Research Institute for Neuroscience, Education and Didactics, Fondazione Patrizio Paoletti, Assisi, Italy

    Fabio Marson

  4. Libera Università Maria Santissima Assunta (LUMSA), Rome, Italy

    Stefano Lasaponara

  5. PhD Program in Behavioral Neuroscience, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Michele Pellegrino

Authors
  1. Michele Pellegrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabio Marson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefano Lasaponara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vincenzo Cestari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fabrizio Doricchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Doricchi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pellegrino, M., Pinto, M., Marson, F. et al. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space–number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants). Exp Brain Res 237, 2633–2643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05617-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05617-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation