Abstract
Field dependence–independence (FDI) is a stable dimension of individual functioning, transversal to different cognitive domains. While the role of some individual variables in time perception has received considerable attention, it is not clear whether and how FDI influences timing abilities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FDI differently affects timing performance depending on whether the task requires cognitive restructuring. Participants were assessed for FDI using the embedded figures test (EFT). They performed a prospective timing task, reproducing the duration of a flickering stimulus, and a retrospective timing task, estimating the duration of the task. We expected performance of field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) individuals not to differ in the prospective task, since restructuring of task material is not needed to reproduce the stimulus duration. Conversely, we predicted that FI individuals should be more accurate than FD ones in the retrospective condition, involving restructuring skills. Results show that while both FD and FI individuals under-reproduced the stimulus duration in the prospective task, only FD participants significantly underestimated the duration of the timing task in the retrospective condition. These results suggest that differences across FD and FI individuals are apparent in timing only when the task requires high-level cognitive processing; conversely, these differences do not affect basic sensory processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avolio BJ, Alexander RA, Barrett GV, Sterns HL (1981) Designing a measure of visual selective attention to assess individual differences in information processing. Appl Psychol Meas 5:29–42
Berry JW, van de Koppel JMH, Sénéchal C, Annis RC, Bahuchet S, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Witkin HA (1986) On the edge of the forest. Cultural adaptation and cognitive development in Central Africa. Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse
Block RA (1974) Memory and the experience of duration in retrospective. Mem Cognit 2:153–160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197508
Block RA (1978) Remembered duration: effects of event and sequence complexity. Mem Cognit 6:320–332. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197462
Block RA (1990) Models of psychological time. In: Block RA (ed) Cognitive models of psychological time, 1st edn. Psychology Press, New York, pp 1–36
Block RA, Gruber RP (2014) Time perception, attention, and memory: a selective review. Acta Psychol (Amst) 149:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.003
Block RA, Reed MJ (1978) Remembered duration: evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 4:656–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.656
Block RA, Zakay D (1997) Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Psychon Bull Rev 4:184–197. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209393
Block RA, Zakay D, Hancock PA (1998) Human aging and duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Aging 13:584–596
Block RA, Hancock PA, Zakay D (2000) Sex differences in duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Mem Cognit 28:1333–1346
Boccia M, Piccardi L, Di Marco M, Pizzamiglio L, Guariglia C (2016) Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence. Exp Brain Res 234:2799–2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9
Boccia M, Piccardi L, D’Alessandro A, Nori R, Guariglia C (2017a) Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy. Exp Brain Res 235:1741–1748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4936-1
Boccia M, Vecchione F, Piccardi L, Guariglia C (2017b) Effect of cognitive style on learning and retrieval of navigational environments. Front Pharmacol 8:496. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00496
Brown SW (1995) Time, change, and motion: the effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Percept Psychophys 57:105–116
Brown SW, Stubbs DA (1988) The psychophysics of retrospective and prospective timing. Perception 17(3):297–310. https://doi.org/10.1068/p170297
Brunec IK, Ozubko JD, Barense M, Moscovitch M (2017) Recollection-dependent memory for event duration in large-scale spatial navigation. Learn Mem 24:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.044032.116
Corson Y, Verrier N, Bucic A (2009) False memories and individual variations: the role of field dependence–independence. Pers Individ Differ 47:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.036
Davidson WB, House WJ (1978) Influence of reflection-impulsivity and cognitive style on time estimation under different ambient conditions. Percept Mot Skills 46:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.46.3c.1083
Droit-Volet S (2013) Time perception in children: a neurodevelopmental approach. Neuropsychologia 51:220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.023
Droit-Volet S, Monceau S, Berthon M, Trahanias P, Maniadakis M (2018) The explicit judgment of long durations of several minutes in everyday life: conscious retrospective memory judgment and the role of affects? PLoS One 13(4):e0195397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195397
Du Preez P (1967) Field dependence and accuracy of comparison of time intervals. Percept Mot Skills 24:467–472
El Haj M, Moroni C, Samson S, Fasotti L, Allain P (2013) Prospective and retrospective time perception are related to mental time travel: evidence from Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Cognit 83:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.008
Elkind D, Koegler RR, Go E (1963) Field independence and concept formation. Percept Mot Skills 17:383–386
Goode PE, Goddard PH, Pascual-Leone J (2002) Event-related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial-order recall task. Int J Psychophysiol 43:123–140
Goodenough DR (1975) The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. ETS Res Bull Ser 1:i-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1975.tb01047.x
Grondin S, Laflamme V (2015) Stevens’s law for time: a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective judgments. Atten Percept Psychophys 77:1044–1051. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0914-5
Grondin S, Plourde M (2007) Judging multi-minute intervals retrospectively. Q J Exp Psychol 60:1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600988976
Haldemann J, Stauffer C, Troche S, Rammsayer T (2011) Processing visual temporal information and its relationship to psychometric intelligence. J Individ Differ 32:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000050
Hashimoto Y, Yotsumoto Y (2018) The amount of time dilation for visual flickers corresponds to the amount of neural entrainments measured by EEG. Front Comput Neurosci 12:30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00030
Hayashi MJ, Valli A, Carlson S (2013) Numerical quantity affects time estimation in the suprasecond range. Neurosci Lett 543:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.054
Herbst SK, Javadi AH, van der Meer E, Busch NA (2013) How long depends on how fast—perceived flicker dilates subjective duration. PLoS One 8(10):e76074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076074
Herbst SK, Chaumon M, Penney TB, Busch NA (2015) Flicker-induced time dilation does not modulate EEG correlates of temporal encoding. Brain Topogr 28:559–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0389-z
Jantzen TB, Thompson WF, Ammirante P, Ranvaud R (2014) Timing skills and expertise: discrete and continuous timed movements among musicians and athletes. Front Psychol 5:1482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01482
Johnston A, Arnold DH, Nishida S (2006) Spatially localized distortions of event time. Curr Biol 16:472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.032
Kanai R, Paffen CLE, Hogendoorn H, Verstraten FAJ (2006) Time dilation in dynamic visual display. J Vis 6:1421–1430
Kaneko S, Murakami I (2009) Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. J Vis 9(7):14. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.7.14
Lhamon WT, Goldstone S (1975) Movement and the judged duration of visual targets. BPS 5:53–54
Linares D, Gorea A (2015) Temporal frequency of events rather than speed dilates perceived duration of moving objects. Sci Rep 5:8825. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08825
Matthews WJ, Meck WH (2016) Temporal cognition: connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Bull 142:865–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045
Michon JA (1972) Processing of temporal information and the cognitive theory of time experience. In: Fraser JT, Haber FC, Müller GH (eds) The study of time. Springer, Berlin, pp 242–258
Mioni G, Stablum F, McClintock SM, Grondin S (2014) Different methods for reproducing time, different results. Atten Percept Psychophys 76:675–681. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0625-3
Okajima M, Yotsumoto Y (2016) Flickering task-irrelevant distractors induce dilation of target duration depending upon cortical distance. Sci Rep 6:32432. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32432
Phillips JR (1977) Relationship of field-dependence-independence to posture and judgment of time duration. Percept Mot Skills 44:931–940
Plomp G, van Leeuwen C, Gepshtein S (2012) Perception of time in articulated visual events. Front Psychol 3:564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00564
Silverman AJ, Cohen SI, Shmavonian BM, Greenberg G (1961) Psychophysiological investigations in sensory deprivation. The body-field dimension. Psychosom Med 23:48–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-196101000-00006
Spiro RJ, Tirre WC (1980) Individual differences in schema utilization during discourse processing. J Educ Psychol 72:204–208
Tascón L, Boccia M, Piccardi L, Cimadevilla JM (2017) Differences in spatial memory recognition due to cognitive style. Front Pharmacol 23:8:550. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00550
Tobin S, Bisson N, Grondin S (2010) An ecological approach to prospective and retrospective timing of long durations: a study involving gamers. PLoS One 5(2):e9271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009271
Turgeon M, Lustig C, Meck WH (2016) Cognitive aging and time perception: roles of bayesian optimization and degeneracy. Front Aging Neurosci 8:102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00102
Wearden JH, Wearden AJ, Rabbit PMA (1997) Age and IQ effects on stimulus and response timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:962–979
Witkin HA (1949) Perception of body position and of the position of the visual field. Psychol Monogr 63:i-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093613
Witkin HA (1977) Cognitive style in personal and cultural adaptation. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Clark University Press, Worcester
Witkin HA, Goodenough DR (1976a) Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. ETS Res Bull Ser 1:i-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1976.tb01098.x
Witkin HA, Goodenough DR (1976b) Field dependence revisited. ETS Res Bull Ser 2:i-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1976.tb01125.x
Witkin HA, Oltman PK, Raskin E, Karp S (1971) A manual for the embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
Wittmann M, Simmons AN, Flagan T, Lane SD, Wackermann J, Paulus MP (2011) Neural substrates of time perception and impulsivity. Brain Res 1406:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.048
Zakay D, Block RA (2004) Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective. Acta Neurobiol Exp 64:319–328
Zakay D, Tsal Y, Moses M, Shahar I (1994) The role of segmentation in prospective and retrospective time estimation processes. Mem Cognit 22:344–351
Acknowledgements
The present study was partially supported by funding from Sapienza University of Rome to AT (Avvio alla Ricerca, 2018; nr AR11816421D63BF2) and by fellowship from the PhD Program in Behavioral Neuroscience of Sapienza University of Rome to AT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teghil, A., Boccia, M. & Guariglia, C. Field dependence–independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation. Exp Brain Res 237, 1019–1029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05485-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05485-3