Skip to main content
Log in

School-aged children can benefit from audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although we live in a multisensory world, children’s memory has been usually studied concentrating on only one sensory modality at a time. In this study, we investigated how audiovisual encoding affects recognition memory. Children (n = 114) from three age groups (8, 10 and 12 years) memorized auditory or visual stimuli presented with a semantically congruent, incongruent or non-semantic stimulus in the other modality during encoding. Subsequent recognition memory performance was better for auditory or visual stimuli initially presented together with a semantically congruent stimulus in the other modality than for stimuli accompanied by a non-semantic stimulus in the other modality. This congruency effect was observed for pictures presented with sounds, for sounds presented with pictures, for spoken words presented with pictures and for written words presented with spoken words. The present results show that semantically congruent multisensory experiences during encoding can improve memory performance in school-aged children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The sensitivity index (d′) was not used here since the results would remain exactly the same with this transformation and d′ would bring no additional information compared with the percentage correct. This is because there was a single recall phase consisting of the memorized items for all congruency categories and new items. Consequently, the false alarm rates (calculated on the basis of yes responses to new items) were equal for all congruency categories, and therefore, the d′ values would be in direct proportion to the percentage correct (hit) rates.

References

  • Bahrick L, Lickliter R (2012) The role of intersensory redundancy in early perceptual, cognitive and social development. In: Bremner A, Lewkowich D, Spence C (eds) Multisensory development. Oxford University Press, UK, pp 183–206

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandwein A, Foxe J, Russo N, Altschuler T, Gomes H, Molholm S (2011) The development of audiovisual multisensory integration across childhood and early adolescence: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cereb Cortex 21:1042–1055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert G, Spence C, Stein B (2004) The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. The MIT Press, London

  • Chen Y, Spence C (2010) When hearing the bark helps to identify the dog: semantically-congruent sounds modulate the identification of masked pictures. Cognition 114:389–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colavita F (1974) Human sensory dominance. Percept Psychophys 25:345–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantidou F, Danos M, Nelson D, Baker S (2011) Effects of modality presentation of working memory in school-age children: evidence for the pictorial superiority hypothesis. Child Neuropsychol 17:173–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker TM, Mareschal D, Johnson MH, Sereno MI (2014) Picturing words? Sensorimotor cortex activation for printed words in child and adult readers. Brain Lang 139:58–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst M (2008) Multisensory integration: a late bloomer. Curr Biol 18:519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8:162–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gori M, Del Viva M, Sandini G, Burr D (2008) Young children do not integrate visual and haptic information. Curr Biol 18:689–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä J, Alho K, Hyvönen H, Tiippana K (2015) Audiovisual semantic congruency during encoding enhances memory performance. Exp Psychol 62:123–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillock A, Powers A, Wallace M (2011) Binding sights and sounds: age-related changes in multisensory temporal processing. Neuropsychologia 49:461–467

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan K, Baker J (2011) Multisensory information boosts numerical matching abilities in young children. Dev Sci 14:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Maldjian JA, Burdette JH, Wallace MT (2004) Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance. Exp Brain Res 158:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann S, Murray MM (2005) The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. Cogn Brain Res 24:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz DJ, Ghazanfar AA (2009) The emergence of multisensory systems through perceptual narrowing. Trends Cogn Sci 13:470–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molholm S, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ (2004) Multisensory visual–auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cereb Cortex 14:452–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran Z, Bachman P, Pham P, Cho S, Cannon T, Shams L (2013) Multisensory encoding improves auditory recognition. Multisens Res 26:581–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MM, Michel CM, Grave de Peralta R, Ortigue S, Brunet D, Gonzalez Andino S, Schnider A (2004) Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging. Neuroimage 21:125–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nava E, Pavani F (2013) Changes in sensory dominance during childhood: converging evidence from the Colavita effect and the sound-induced flash illusion. Child Dev 84:604–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo M, Sinnet S, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C (2010) Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect. Neurosci Lett 480:186–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter MC (1993) Very short-term conceptual memory. Mem Cogn 21:156–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter MC (2012) Conceptual short term memory in perception and thought. Front Psychol 3:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider TR, Engel AK, Debener S (2008) Multisensory identification of natural objects in a two-way crossmodal priming paradigm. Exp Psychol 55:121–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shams L, Seitz AR (2008) Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn Sci 12:411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen A, Talsma D, Murray M (2015) Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination. Cognition 138:148–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torppa M, Lyytinen P, Erskine J, Eklund K, Lyytinen H (2010) Language development, literacy skills and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familiar risk for dyslexia. J Learn Disabil 43:308–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant from the University of Helsinki. It is part of the research activities of CICERO Learning Network, Finland, www.cicero.fi. We are grateful to the pupils, guardians and teachers in Iivisniemi elementary school and Tähtiniitty elementary school, Espoo, Finland, where the research was conducted. We thank Professor Kimmo Alho for comments on the manuscript. The Multimodal Stimulus Set was developed by T.R. Schneider, S. Debener and A.K. Engel at the Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenni Heikkilä.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heikkilä, J., Tiippana, K. School-aged children can benefit from audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding. Exp Brain Res 234, 1199–1207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4341-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4341-6

Keywords

Navigation