Skip to main content
Log in

Shared processing of planning articulatory gestures and grasping

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed that articulatory gestures are shaped by tight integration in planning mouth and hand acts. This hypothesis is supported by recent behavioral evidence showing that response selection between the precision and power grip is systematically influenced by simultaneous articulation of a syllable. For example, precision grip responses are performed relatively fast when the syllable articulation employs the tongue tip (e.g., [te]), whereas power grip responses are performed relatively fast when the syllable articulation employs the tongue body (e.g., [ke]). However, this correspondence effect, and other similar effects that demonstrate the interplay between grasping and articulatory gestures, has been found when the grasping is performed during overt articulation. The present study demonstrates that merely reading the syllables silently (Experiment 1) or hearing them (Experiment 2) results in a similar correspondence effect. The results suggest that the correspondence effect is based on integration in planning articulatory gestures and grasping rather than requiring an overt articulation of the syllables. We propose that this effect reflects partially overlapped planning of goal shapes of the two distal effectors: a vocal tract shape for articulation and a hand shape for grasping. In addition, the paper shows a pitch–grip correspondence effect in which the precision grip is associated with a high-pitched vocalization of the auditory stimuli and the power grip is associated with a low-pitched vocalization. The underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon are discussed in relation to the articulation–grip correspondence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakan P, Alperson B (1967) Pronounceability, attensity, and interference in the color-word test. Am J Psychol 80:416–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barch DM, Sabb FW, Carter CS, Braver TS, Noll DC, Cohen JD (1999) Overt verbal responding during fMRI scanning: empirical investigations of problems and potential solutions. NeuroImage 10:642–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binkofski P, Buccino G (2004) Motor functions of the Broca’s region. Brain Lang 89:362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browman CP, Goldstein L (1989) Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6:201–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corballis MC (2002) From hand to mouth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, The origins of language

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis I, Newstead SE (1981) Is phonological recoding under strategic control? Mem Cognit 9:472–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin JT, Aydelott J (2009) Speech perception: motoric contributions versus the motor theory. Curr Biol 19:198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK (1999) Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:567–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eiter BM, Inhoff AW (2008) Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation. Psychol Res 72:666–674

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R, Tucker M (2000) Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol 9:451–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R, Tucker M, Symes E, Vainio L (2007) Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:670–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fadiga L, Craighero L, Buccino G, Rizzolatti G (2002) Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 15:399–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio P, Cantagallo A, Craighero L, D’Ausilio A, Roy AC, Pozzo T, Calzolari F, Granieri E, Fadiga L (2009) Encoding of human action in Broca’s area. Brain 132:1080–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floel A, Ellger T, Breitenstein C, Knecht S (2003) Language perception activates the hand motor cortex: implications for motor theories of speech perception. Eur J Neurosci 18:704–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G (2005) Parietal lobe: from action to understanding. Science 308:662–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Campione GC (2011) Do postures of distal effectors affect the control of actions of other distal effectors? Evidence for a system of interactions between hand and mouth. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19793

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Corballis MC (2006) From manual gesture to speech: a gradual transition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:949–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M (2000) Language and motor control. Exp Brain Res 133:468–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Gangitano M, Grimaldi S (2001) Grasping with hand and mouth: a kinematic study on healthy subjects. J Neurophysiol 86:1685–1699

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Campione GC, Dalla Volta R, Bernardis P (2009) The observation of manual grasp actions affects the control of speech: a combined behavioral and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 47:3190–3202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S, Dixon P (2002) Semantics affects the planning but not the control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 146:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gracco VL (1997) A neuromotor perspective on speech production. In: Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds) Speech Production: Motor Control Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton ST (2010) The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments. Exp Brain Res 204:475–491

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield PM (1991) Language, tools, and brain: the ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behav Brain Sci 14:531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewes GW (1973) Primate communication and the gestural origins of language. Curr Anthropol 14:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickok G, Poeppel D (2004) Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92:67–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham DR, Isaak MI, Domingue JM (2008) The exaptation of manual dexterity for articulate speech: an electromyogram investigation. Exp Brain Res 186:603–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon A (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss RM, Hadar U (1999) The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In: Campbell R, Messing L (eds) Gesture, speech, and sign. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 93–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt WJM, Richardson G, La Heij W (1985) Pointing and voicing in deictic expressions. J Mem Lang 24:133–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman M, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DS, Studdert-Kennedy M (1967) Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev 74:431–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makris S, Grant S, Hadar AA, Yarrow K (2013) Binocular vision enhances a rapidly evolving affordance priming effect: behavioural and TMS evidence. Brain Cognit 83:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer EA (1869) Zur Tonbewegung des Vokals im gesprochenen and gesungenen einzelwort. Phonetische Studien (Beiblatt zu der Zeitschrift Die Neuren Sprachen) 10:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan FJ (1970) Covert oral behavior during the silent performance of language tasks. Psychol Bull 74:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill D (1992) Hand and Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister IG, Boroojerdi B, Foltys H, Sparing R, Huber W, Topper R (2003) Motor cortex hand area and speech: implications for the development of language. Neuropsychologia 41:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möttönen R, Watkins KE (2012) Using TMS to study the role of the articulatory motor system in speech perception. Aphasiology 26:1103–1118

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer ED, Rosen HJ, Ojemann JG, Buckner RL, Kelley WM, Petersen SE (2001) An event-related fMRI study of overt and covert word stem completion. NeuroImage 14:182–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parise CV, Spence C (2009) When birds of a feather flock together: synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS ONE 4(5):e5664

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller F, Huss M, Kherif F, Martin F, Hauk O, Shtyrov Y (2006) Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7865–7870

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran VS, Hubbard EM (2001) Synaesthesia—a window into perception, thought and language. J Conscious Stud 8:3–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Gentilucci M, Fogassi L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Ponzoni-Maggi S (1987) Neurons related to goal-directed motor acts in inferior area 6 of the macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res 67:220–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M (1988) Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey: II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res 71:491–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmelin R, Sams M (2002) Motor cortex involvement during verbal versus non-verbal lip and tongue movements. Hum Brain Mapp 16:81–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C (2011) Crossmodal correspondence: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:971–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stout D, Chaminade T (2012) Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 367:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokimura H, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Asakura T, Rothwell JC (1996) Speech-induced changes in corticospinal excitability. Ann Neurol 40:628–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vainio L, Schulman M, Tiippana K, Vainio M (2013) Effect of syllable articulation on precision and power grip performance. PLoS ONE 8(1):e53061

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins KE, Strafella AP, Paus T (2003) Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41:989–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen DH, Levitt AG (1995) The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. J Phon 23:349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang HD, Fonteijn HM, Norris DG, Hagoort P (2010) Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the perisylvian language networks. Cereb Cortex 20:549–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank undergraduate students Silja Heikkinen, Ira Homi, Veera Paananen, Minna Parkkila and Karoliina Wilska for their contribution in planning and carrying out Experiment 2. The research leading to these results has received funding from the Academy of Finland under Grant agreement numbers 1265610 and 125940.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Vainio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vainio, L., Tiainen, M., Tiippana, K. et al. Shared processing of planning articulatory gestures and grasping. Exp Brain Res 232, 2359–2368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3932-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3932-y

Keywords

Navigation