Abstract
It has been hypothesized that many of the cognitive impairments commonly seen after right brain damage (RBD) can be characterized as a failure to build or update mental models. We (Danckert et al. in Neglect as a disorder of representational updating. NOVA Open Access, New York, 2012a; Cereb Cortex 22:2745–2760, 2012b) were the first to directly assess the association between RBD and updating and found that RBD patients were unable to exploit a strongly biased play strategy in their opponent in the children’s game rock, paper, scissors. Given that this game required many other cognitive capacities (i.e., working memory, sustained attention, reward processing), RBD patients could have failed this task for various reasons other than a failure to update. To assess the generality of updating deficits after RBD, we had RBD, left brain-damaged (LBD) patients and healthy controls (HCs) describe line drawings that evolved gradually from one figure (e.g., rabbit) to another (e.g., duck) in addition to the RPS updating task. RBD patients took significantly longer to alter their perceptual report from the initial object to the final object than did LBD patients and HCs. Although both patient groups performed poorly on the RPS task, only the RBD patients showed a significant correlation between the two, very different, updating tasks. We suggest these data indicate a general deficiency in the ability to update mental representations following RBD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Seiger A, Nydevik I (2002) Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and relationship to disability. J Rehabil Med 34:215–220
Aslin RN, Newport EL (2012) Statistical learning from acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21:170–176. doi:10.1177/0963721412436806
Bartolomeo P, De Schotten MT, Chica AB (2012) Brain networks of visuospatial attention and their disruption in visual neglect. Front hum neurosci 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00110
Basso G, Nichelli P, Frassinetti F, di Pellegrino G (1996) Time perception in a neglected space. Neuroreport 7:2111–2114
Bernstein LJ, Cooper LA (1997) Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:721–737. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.721
Bischoff-Grethe A, Hazeltine E, Bergren L, Ivry RB, Grafton ST (2009) The influence of feedback valence in associative learning. Neuroimage 44:243–251. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.038
Bonato M (2012). Neglect and extinction depend greatly on task demands: a review. Front hum neurosci 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00195
Bonneh YS, Pavlovskaya M, Ring H, Soroker N (2004) Abnormal binocular rivalry in unilateral neglect: evidence for a nonspatial mechanism of extinction. Neuroreport 15:473–477
Bowen A, Lincoln NB (2007) Rehabilitation for spatial neglect improves test performance but not disability. Stroke 38:2869–2870. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490227
Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis RC (1999) Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke 30:1196–1202. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.6.1196
Britz J, Landis T, Michel CM (2009) Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cereb Cortex 19:55–65. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn056
Brownell HH, Michel D, Powelson J, Gardner H (1983) Surprise but not coherence: sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients. Brain Lang 18:20–27. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(83)90002-0
Bulf H, Johnson SP, Valenza E (2011) Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant. Cogn 121:127–132. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.010
Byrne RMJ (2002) Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends Cogn Sci 6:426–431. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01974-5
Cassidy TP, Lewis S, Gray CS (1998) Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:555–557. doi:10.1136/jnnp.64.4.555
Chan YC, Chou TL, Chen HC, Liang KC (2012a) Segregating the comprehension and elaboration processing of verbal jokes: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 61:899–906. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.052
Chan YC, Chou TL, Chen HC, Yeh YC, Lavallee JP, Liang KC, Chang KE (2012b) Towards a neural circuit model of verbal humor processing: an fMRI study of the neural substrates of incongruity detection and resolution. Neuroimage 66:169–176. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.019
Christman SD, Henning B, Geers AL, Propper RE, Niebauer CL (2008) Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality 13:403–426. doi:10.1080/13576500802079646
Christman SD, Sontam V, Jasper JD (2009) Individual differences in ambiguous-figure perception: degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Percept 38:1183–1198. doi:10.1068/p6131
Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58:306–324. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
Craig AD (2009) How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:59–70. doi:10.1038/nrn2555
Danckert J (in press) Spatial neglect: not simply disordered attention. In: Schweizer T, MacDonald RL (eds) The behavioral consequences of stroke. Springer, New York
Danckert J, Ferber S, Doherty T, Steinmetz H, Nicolle D, Goodale MA (2002) Selective, non-lateralised impairment of motor imagery following right parietal damage. Neurocase 8:194–204
Danckert J, Ferber S, Pun C, Broderick C, Striemer C, Rock S, Stewart D (2007) Neglected time: impaired temporal perception of multisecond intervals in unilateral neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1706–1720. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1706
Danckert J, Stöttinger E, Anderson B (2012a) Neglect as a disorder of representational updating. NOVA Open Access, New York
Danckert J, Stöttinger E, Quehl N, Anderson B (2012b) Right hemisphere brain damage impairs strategy updating. Cereb Cortex 22:2745–2760. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr351
Decety J, Lamm C (2007) The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Nerurosci 13:580–593. doi:10.1177/1073858407304654
Ferber S, Danckert J (2006) Lost in space: the fate of memory representations for non-neglected stimuli. Neuropsychologia 44:320–325. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.018
Filipowicz A, Anderson B, Danckert J (2013) Learning what from where: effects of spatial regularity on non-spatial sequence learning and updating. Advanced online publication, Q J Exp Psy. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.867518
Fink GR, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS, Dolan RJ (1997) Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain 120:1779–1791. doi:10.1093/brain/120.10.1779
Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, Voetsch B, Fong WC, Caplan LR (2005) Insular cortex infarction in acute middle cerebral artery territory stroke: predictor of stroke severity and vascular lesion. Arch Neuro 62:1081–1085. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.7.1081
Fischer GH (1967a) Measuring ambiguity. Am J Psychol 80:541–557
Fischer GH (1967b) Preparation of ambiguous stimulus materials. Percept Psychophys 2:421–422. doi:10.3758/BF03208780
Fiser J, Aslin RN (2002) Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15822–15826. doi:10.1073/pnas.232472899
Gazzaniga MS (1995) Principles of human brain organization derived from split-brain studies. Neuron 14:217–228
Griffin R, Friedman O, Ween J, Winner E, Happé F, Brownell H (2006) Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: refining the scope of impairment. Laterality 11:195–225. doi:10.1080/13576500500450552
Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB (2012) Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychol Sci 17:767–773. doi:10.1080/13576500500450552
Happé F, Brownell H, Winner E (1999) Acquired theory of mind impairments following stroke. Cogn 70:211–240. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00005-0
Haruno M, Kawato M (2006) Different neural correlates of reward expectation and reward expectation error in the putamen and caudate nucleus during stimulus-action-reward association learning. J Neurophysiol 95:948–959. doi:10.1152/jn.00382.2005
Hohwy J (2012) Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain. Conscious Res 3:1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00096
Husain M, Shapiro K, Martin J, Kennard C (1997) Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature 385:154–156. doi:10.1038/385154a0
Husain M, Mannan S, Hodgson T, Wojciulik E, Driver J, Kennard C (2001) Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. Brain 124:941–952. doi:10.1093/brain/124.5.941
Jastrow J (1900) Fact and fable in psychology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Jenkinson M, Pechaud M, Smith S (2005) BET2: MR-based estimation of brain, skull and scalp surfaces. In: Eleventh annual meeting of the organization for human brain mapping
Jones CL, Ward J, Critchley HD (2010) The neuropsychological impact of insular cortex lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:611–618. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.193672
Kleinschmidt A, Büchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RSJ (1998) Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 265:2427–2433. doi:10.1098/rspb1998.0594
Long GM, Toppino TC (2004) Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. Psychol Bull 130:748. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.748
Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280:1930–1934. doi:10.1126/science.280.5371.1930
Menon V, Uddin LQ (2010) Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct 214:655–667. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0
Merrifield C, Hurwitz M, Danckert J (2010) Multimodal temporal perception deficits in a patient with left spatial neglect. Cogn Neurosci 1:244–253. doi:10.1080/17588921003759934
Miller MB, Valsangkar-Smith M, Newman S, Dumont H, Wolford G (2005) Brain activations associated with probability matching. Neuropsychologia 43:1598–1608. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.021
Mitchell JP (2008) Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb Cortex 18:262–271. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm051
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H (2005) The montreal cognitive assessment, moca: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
Nelson HE (1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12:313–324. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80035-4
Nijboer T, Van de Port I, Schepers V, Post M, Visser-Meily A (2013) Predicting functional outcome after stroke: the influence of neglect on basic activities in daily living. Front hum neurosci 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00182
Peirce JW (2009) Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform 2:1–8. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
Perner J (1991) Understanding the representational mind. Learning development and conceptual change. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Perner J, Aichhorn M, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, Ladurner G (2006) Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction. Soc Neurosci 1:245–258. doi:10.1080/17470910600989896
Piper BJ, Li V, Eiwaz MA, Kobel YV, Benice TS, Chu AM, Olsen RHJ, Rice DZ, Gray HM, Mueller ST (2011) Executive function on the psychology experiment building language tests. Behav Res Methods 44:110–123. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0096-6
Rafetseder E, Perner J (2010) Is reasoning from counterfactual antecedents evidence for counterfactual reasoning? Think Reason 16:131–155. doi:10.1080/13546783.2010.488074
Ramachandran VS (1995) Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Conscious Cogn 4:22–51. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1002
Rauch SL, Savage CR, Brown HD, Curran T, Alpert NM, Kendrick A, Fischman AJ, Kosslyn SM (1995) A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning. Hum Brain Mapp 3:271–286. doi:10.1002/hbm.460030403
Ringman JM, Saver JL, Woolson RF, Clarke WR, Adams HP (2004) Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology 63:468–474. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000133011.10689.CE
Robertson LC, Delis DC (1986) ‘Part-whole’processing in unilateral brain-damaged patients: dysfunction of hierarchical organization. Neuropsychologia 24:363–370. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90021-7
Roser ME, Fiser J, Aslin RN, Gazzaniga MS (2011) Right hemisphere dominance in visual statistical learning. J Cogn Neurosci 23:1088–1099. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21508
Samson AC, Zysset S, Huber O (2008) Cognitive humor processing: different logical mechanisms in nonverbal cartoons—an fMRI study. Soc Neurosci 3:125–140. doi:10.1080/17470910701745858
Sato Y, Akiyama E, Farmer JD (2002) Chaos in learning a simple two-person game. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:4748–4751. doi:10.1073/pnas.032086299
Seger CA, Prabhakaran V, Poldrack RA, Gabrieli JD (2000) Neural activity differs between explicit and implicit learning of artificial grammar strings: an fMRI study. Psychobiology 28:283–292
Seger CA, Peterson EJ, Cincotta CM, Lopez-Paniagua D, Anderson CW (2010) Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling. Neuroimage 50:644–656. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.083
Shapiro K, Hillstrom AP, Husain M (2002) Control of visuotemporal attention by inferior parietal and superior temporal cortex. Curr Biol 12:1320–1325. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01040-0
Shaqiri A, Anderson B (2013) Priming and statistical learning in right brain damage patients. Neuropsychologia 51:2526–2533
Shaqiri A, Anderson B, Danckert J (2013) Statistical learning as a tool for rehabilitation in spatial neglect. Front hum neurosci, 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00224
Spinazzola L, Pia L, Folegatti A, Marchetti C, Berti A (2008) Modular structure of awareness for sensorimotor disorders: evidence from anosagnosia for hemiplegia and anosagnosia for hemianaesthesia. Neuropsychologia 46:915–926. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.015
Stöttinger E, Filipowicz A, Anderson B, Danckert J (2012) Hemispheric effects on strategy updating. Poster presented at the CNS (Cognitive Neuroscience Society), Chicago, USA
Stöttinger E, Filipowicz A, Danckert J, Anderson B (in press) The effects of prior learned strategies on updating an opponent’s strategy in the rock, paper, scissors game. Cogn Sci. doi:10.1111/cogs.12115
Striemer C, Ferber S, Danckert J (2013) Can spatial working memory training rehabilitate neglect? Front in hum neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00334
Tenenbaum JB, Kemp C, Griffiths TL, Goodman ND (2011) How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 331:1279–1285. doi:10.1126/science.1192788
Turk-Browne NB, Scholl BJ, Chun MM, Johnson MK (2009) Neural evidence of statistical learning: efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. J Cogn Neurosci 21:1934–1945. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21131
Vickery TJ, Jiang YV (2009) Inferior parietal lobule supports decision making under uncertainty in humans. Cereb Cortex 19:916–925. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn140
Vocat R, Saj A, Vuilleumier P (2012) The riddle of anosognosia: does unawareness of hemiplegia involve a failure to update beliefs? Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.009
Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happé F, Falkai P, Maier W, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Zilles K (2001) Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage 14:170–181. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0789
Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P (1987) Development of a behavioural test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:98–102
Winner E, Brownell H, Happé F, Blum A, Pincus D (1998) Distinguishing lies from jokes: theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 62:89–106. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1889
Wolford G, Miller MB, Gazzaniga M (2000) The left hemisphere’s role in hypothesis formation. J Neurosci 20:RC64
Wolford G, Newman SE, Miller MB, Wig GS (2004) Searching for patterns in random sequences. Can J Exp Psychol 58:221–228. doi:10.1037/h0087446
Zaretskaya N, Thielscher A, Logothetis NK, Bartels A (2010) Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Curr Biol 20:2106–2111. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.046
Acknowledgments
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp) of Canada Discovery (#261628-07), Canada Research Chair grants, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (http://www.heartandstroke.on.ca; #NA 6999 to J.D.) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html; #219972 operating grant to J.D. and B.A.). The above-mentioned funding agencies had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or the preparation of the manuscript. We thank Elizabeth Kurusi for her assistance with patient recruitment and data collection and Linda Carson for her help in improvement the quality of two of the picture sets. We thank Nazanin Mohammadi Sepahvand for her help with data analysis. Finally, we would like to thank all of our participants for their time and effort in this experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
James Danckert and Britt Anderson have contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stöttinger, E., Filipowicz, A., Marandi, E. et al. Statistical and perceptual updating: correlated impairments in right brain injury. Exp Brain Res 232, 1971–1987 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3887-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3887-z