Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reacting while moving: influence of right limb movement on left limb reaction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was designed to determine whether the activation of a muscle group (flexors or extensors) used to produce an ongoing movement of one limb influenced the reaction time and associated initiation of elbow flexion or extension movements of the contralateral limb. Right-handed participants in the bimanual groups were asked to produce a pattern of flexion/extension movements defined by a sine wave (period = 2 s, amplitude = 16°) with the right limb. While performing the right limb movement, participants were instructed that they were to react as quickly as possible by making a flexion or extension movement with their left limb when the cursor they were using to track the sine wave changed color. Participants in the unimanual groups performed the left limb reaction time task but were not asked to make right limb movements. The reaction time stimulus occurred once in each trial and was presented at one of six locations on one of the six cycles comprising the sinusoidal waveform. Participants performed 7 blocks of 6 test trials. Reaction time was calculated as the time interval between the color change of the cursor and the initiation of the response with the left limb. Movement time was calculated as the interval of time between the initiation of the response and the left limb cursor crossing the upper or lower boundary line. Mean reaction of the left limb was significantly influenced by the concurrent type of movement (flexion/extension) of the right limb. Reaction times were shorter on trials in which both limbs were initiating movement with homologous muscles as compared to trials in which the limbs were initiating movement with non-homologous muscles. No differences were detected when the stimuli were presented during the ballistic phase of the right limb movement, and no differences at any position were detected for the unimanual groups. This result is consistent with the notion that neural crosstalk can influence the time required to react to a stimulus but this influence occurs when contralateral muscles are activated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews EC, Westerman SJ (2012) Age differences in simulated driving performance: compensatory processes. Accid Anal Prev 45:660–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aramaki Y, Osu R, Sadato N (2010) Resource-demanding versus cost-effective bimanual interaction in the brain. Exp Brain Res 203:407–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle J, Kennedy D, Shea CH (2012) Optimizing the control of high ID single degree of freedom movements: re-thinking the obvious. Exp Brain Res 223:377–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SH, Cooke JD (1990) Movement related phasic muscle activation: relations with temporal profile of movement. J Neurophysiol 63:455–464

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byblow WD, Goodman D (1994) Performance asymmetries in multifrequency coordination. Hum Mov Sci 13:147–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byblow WD, Carson RG, Goodman D (1994) Expressions of asymmetries and anchoring in bimanual coordination. Hum Mov Sci 13:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso de Oliveira S (2002) The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psychol 110:139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RG, Thomas J, Summers JJ, Walters MR, Semjen A (1997) The dynamics of bimanual circle drawing. Q J Exp Psychol 50:664–683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaert D, Semjen A, Summers JJ (1999) Simulating a neural cross-talk model for between-hand interference during bimanual circle drawing. Biol Cybern 81:343–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christoforou Z, Karlaftis MG, Yannis G (2013) Reaction times of young alcohol-impaired drivers. Accid Anal Prev. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.030

  • Daffertshofer A, Peper CL, Beek PJ (2005) Stabilization of bimanual coordination due to active interhemispheric inhibition: a dynamical account. Biol Cybern 92:101–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Kennerley S, Ivry RB (2001) Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychol Sci 12:493–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Nurss WK, Ivry RB (2003) The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. J Neurophysiol 4:2409–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz EA (1997) Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. QJ Exp Psychol 50A:684–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz EA, Eliassen JC, Ivry RB, Gazzaniga MS (1996) Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients. Psychol Sci 7:306–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL (1998) Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movements. J Neurophysiol 80:1860–1867

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazeltine E, Diedrichsen J, Kennerley SW, Ivry RB (2003) Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters. Psychol Res 67:56–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, Spijkers W, Steglich W (2001) Static and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal movements. J Mot Behav 33:67–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Spijkers W, Steglich C, Kleinsorge T (2002) Parametric coupling and generalized decoupling revealed by concurrent and successive isometric contractions of distal muscles. Acta Psychol 111:205–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer EH, Bastian AJ (2013) The effects of task demands on bimanual skill acquisition. Exp Brain Res 226:193–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Newell KM (2011) Visual information gain and task asymmetry interact in bimanual force coordination and control. Exp Brain Res 212:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagerer FA, Summers JJ, Semjen A (2003) Instabilities during antiphase bimanual movements: are ipsilateral pathways involved? Exp Brain Res 151:489–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Physiol 15:1000–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Scholz JP, Schoner G (1986) Nonequilibrium phase-transitions in coordinated biological motion—critical fluctuations. Phys Letters A 118:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy DM, Boyle JB, Shea CH (2012) Rhythmical bimanual force production: 1:2 and 2:3 coordination patterns. Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp ST (2010) Comments on the classic Henry and Rogers (1960) paper on its 50th anniversary: resolving the issue of simple versus choice reaction time. Res Q Exerc Sport 81:108–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs AJ, Shea CH (2010) Amplitude differences, spatial assimilation, and integrated feedback in bimanual coordination. Exp Brain Res 202:519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs AJ, Buchanan JJ, Shea CH (2010a) Perceptual and attentional influences on continuous 2:1 and 3:2 multi-frequency bimanual coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:936–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs AJ, Buchanan JJ, Shea CH (2010b) Impossible is nothing: 5:3 and 4:3 multi-frequency bimanual coordination. Exp Brain Res 201:249–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie Y, Gallagher SP (2004) Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 38:11–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Almeida QJ, Chua R (2002) Spatial constraints in bimanual coordination: influences of effector orientation. Exp Brain Res 146:205–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord SR, Caplan GA, Ward JA (1993) Balance, reaction time, and muscle strength in exercising and nonexercising older women: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:837–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maki Y, Wong KF, Sugiura M, Ozaki T, Sadato N (2008) Asymmetric control mechanisms of bimanual coordination: an application of directed connectivity analysis to kinematic and functional MRI data. Neuroimage 42:1295–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Baba DM (1984) Bimanual movement control: information processing and interaction effects. Q J Exp Psychol 37:335–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechsner F, Knoblich G (2004) Do muscles matter for coordinated action? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:490–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Obhi SS, Goodale MA (2005) Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing. J Neurophysiol 94:1861–1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oullier O, Lagarde J, Jantzen KJ, Kelso JA (2006) Coordination dynamics: (in)stability and metastability in the behavioural and neural systems. J Soc Biol 200:145–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semjen A, Summers JJ, Cattaert D (1995) Hand coordination in bimanual circle drawing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept 21:1139–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers W, Heuer H (1995) Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Q J Exp Psychol 48:716–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers W, Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, van der Loo H (1997) Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychol 96:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP (2002) Intermanual coordination: from behavior principles to neural-network interactions. Nature Rev 3:350–361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N (2004) Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. Trends Cogn Sci 8:18–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP, Jardin K, Meulenbroek R, Dounskaia N, HofkensVanDenBrandt M (1997) Egocentric and allocentric constraints in the expression of patterns of interlimb coordination. J Cogn Neurosci 9:348–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP, Dounskaia N, Bogaerts H, Ellen S (1998) Patterns of interlimb coordination: constraints in bimanual movement. Int J Psychophysiol 30:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1988) Reaction time, speed of performance, and age. Ann N Y Acad Sci 515:1–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenderoth N, Debaere F, Sunaert S, Swinnen SP (2005) Spatial interference during bimanual coordination: differential brain networks associated with control of movement amplitude and direction. Hum Brain Mapp 26:286–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4243, USA

    Deanna M. Kennedy, Chaoyi Wang & Charles H. Shea

Authors
  1. Deanna M. Kennedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chaoyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles H. Shea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles H. Shea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, D.M., Wang, C. & Shea, C.H. Reacting while moving: influence of right limb movement on left limb reaction. Exp Brain Res 230, 143–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3638-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3638-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation