Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metacognition of agency: proximal action and distal outcome

  • Volition
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cues contributing to people’s metacognitions of agency were investigated in two experiments in which people played a computer game that involved trying to “touch”, via a mouse moving a cursor, downward scrolling X’s (Experiment 1), or trying to “explode” the downward scrolling X’s (Experiment 2). Both experiments varied (a) proximal action-related information by either introducing or not introducing Turbulence into the mouse controls and (b) distal outcome-related information such that touched X’s “exploded” either 100 or 75 % of the time. Both variables affected people’s judgments of agency (JOAs), but the effect was different. First, the decrement in feelings of agency was greater with the proximal variable than with distal variable. Second, while the proximal variable always had a large direct effect on JOAs, even taking judgments of performance (JOPs) into account, JOPs completely accounted for the effect of the distal variable in Experiment 1, where the instructions were just to touch the X’s. And even in Experiment 2, in which the instructions were to explode the X’s, the direct effect of the distal variable on JOAs was small. These data indicate that these two cues exhibit different psychological profiles. The proximal action-related information is a diagnostic cue to agency indicating the match between one’s own intentions and actions. Internal monitoring of intentions is necessary and so the self is implicated. However, distal outcome can be largely monitored using information external to the agent, and so—while it is used by people to make agency judgments—it is a non-diagnostic cue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloy LB, Abramson LY (1979) Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? J Exp Psychol Gen 108:441–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe GEM (2000) Intention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Balslev D, Nielsen FA, Lund TE, Law I, Paulson OB (2006) Similar brain networks for detecting visuo-motor and visuo-proprioceptive synchrony. Neuroimage 31:308–312. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol 44:1175–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1996) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore S-J, Decety J (2001) From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:561–567. doi:10.1038/35086023

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore S-J, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (1999) Spatiotemporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 11:551–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore S-J, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2000) Why can’t you tickle yourself? NeuroReport 11:R11–R16. doi:10.1097/00001756-200008030-00002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambon V, Wenke D, Fleming SM, Prinz W, Haggard P (2012) An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cereb Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs059

  • Chaminade T, Decety J (2002) Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. NeuroReport 13:1975–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danto AC (1965) Basic actions. Am Philos Q 2:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • David N, Newen A, Vogeley K (2008) The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Conscious Cogn 17:523–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D (2001) Essays on actions and events. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Decety J, Lamm C (2007) The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 13:580–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inquiry 11:227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrer C, Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage 15:596–603. doi:10.1006/Nimg.2001.1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jeannerod M (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18:324–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrer C, Frey SH, Van Horn JD, Tunik E, Turk D, Inati S, Grafton ST et al (2008) The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cereb Cortex 18:254–261. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fourneret P, Jeannerod M (1998) Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 36:1133–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S (2007) The natural philosophy of agency. Philosophy Compass 2:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentsch A, Schutz-Bosbach S (2011) I did it: unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature. J Cogn Neurosci 23:3817–3828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P (2008) Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neuro 9:934–946. doi:10.1038/nrn2497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Tsakiris M (2009) The experience of agency: feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions Psychol Sci 18:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5:382–385. doi:10.1038/nn827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins HH, Ward WC (1965) Judgement of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychol Monog 79: Whole No. 79

  • Joseph MA (2004) Donald Davidson. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Stottmeister F, Kircher T (2004) Self-monitoring in patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Med 34:1561–1569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau HC, Rogers RD, Passingham RE (2007) Manipulating the experienced onset of intention after action execution. J Cogn Neurosci 19:81–90. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leube DT, Knoblich G, Erb M, Grodd W, Bartels M, Kircher TT (2003) The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. Neuroimage 20:2084–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch RF, Myers JL (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research: a comparison of three different methods. J Exp Psychol Learn 16:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J (in press) Cues to agency. In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) Agency and joint attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Metcalfe J, Greene MJ (2007) Metacognition of agency. J Exp Psychol Gen 136:184–199. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J, Eich TS, Castel AD (2010) Metacognition of agency across the lifespan. Cognition 116:267–282. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J, Van Snellenberg JX, DeRosse P, Balsam P, Malhotra AK (2012) Judgements of agency in schizophrenia: an impairment in autonoetic metacognition. Phil Trans R Soc B 367:1391–1400. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 9:1265–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miele DB, Wager TD, Mitchell JP, Metcalfe J (2011) Dissociating neural correlates of action monitoring and metacognition of agency. J Cogn Neurosci 23:3620–3636. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacherie E (in press) Sense of agency: many facets, multiple sources. In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) Agency and joint attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Sato A (2009) Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition 110:74–83. doi:10.1016/J.Cognition.2008.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman MEP (1975) Helplessness: on depression, development, and death. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler S, von Cramon DY, Brass M (2009) Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 46:290–298. doi:10.1016/J.Neuroimage.2009.01.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson G (2003) Mental ballistics or the involuntariness of spontaneity. Proc Aristot Soc 103:227–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A (2008) Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious Cogn 17:219–239. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik M, Thier P, Leube DT, Schlotterbeck P, Lindner A (2010) Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Brain 133:262–271. doi:10.1093/Brain/Awp291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tricomi EM, Delgado MR, Fiez JA (2004) Modulation of caudate activity by action contingency. Neuron 41:281–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wel R, Knoblich G (in press) Cues to agency: time will tell. In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) Agency and joint attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Wegner DM (2002) The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner DM, Wheatley T (1999) Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. Am Psychol 54:480–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner DM, Sparrow B, Winerman L (2004) Vicarious agency: experiencing control over the movements of others. J Pers Soc Psychol 86:838–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenke D, Fleming SM, Haggard P (2010) Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition 115:26–38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM (1997) Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1:209–216. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882. doi:10.1126/science.7569931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Patrick Kennedy, Karen Kelly, Greg Jensen, Rachel Burris, and the members of Metalab, for lively discussions and for help in conducting and programming these experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA

    Janet Metcalfe & Teal S. Eich

  2. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    David B. Miele

Authors
  1. Janet Metcalfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teal S. Eich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David B. Miele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Metcalfe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metcalfe, J., Eich, T.S. & Miele, D.B. Metacognition of agency: proximal action and distal outcome. Exp Brain Res 229, 485–496 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3371-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3371-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation