Abstract
Imitation is a fundamentally important human capability and has been the topic of considerable research in the behavioural sciences. One paradigm for investigating the basic nature of imitation is the “automatic imitation” paradigm. In this paradigm, participants are symbolically cued to make a particular response, whilst being incidentally exposed to a congruent or incongruent motor action performed by another person. The robust finding is that when the incidental action is incongruent with the cued action, participants are slower to respond than when it is congruent. Despite the name given to this paradigm, the extent to which the imitative tendency involved is actually automatic remains unclear. Here, we manipulated the probability of congruent and incongruent trials within blocks to assess the effects of expectation on the imitative process. In addition, we determined whether an individual difference variable related to how people process others’ behaviour—narcissism—affected the automaticity of imitation. Our results confirm that imitation as observed in this paradigm is robust in the face of expectation. However, the degree to which expectation modulates automatic imitation was enhanced for individuals who scored higher on a narcissism inventory. Together, these results suggest that imitation in the automatic imitation paradigm is indeed largely automatic, but that individual differences in narcissism can change the extent to which imitative behaviour manifests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames DR, Rose P, Anderson CP (2006) The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. J Res Pers 40:440–450. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
Bach P, Peatfield NA, Tipper SP (2007) Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception. Exp Brain Res 78:509–517. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0756-4
Bastiaansen JA, Thioux M, Keysers C (2009) Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2391–2404. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0058
Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 117:497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Becchio C, Manera V, Sartori L, Cavallo A, Castiello U (2012) Grasping intentions: from thought experiments to empirical evidence. Front Hum Neurosci 6:1–6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00117
Bowlby J (1982) Attached and loss, vol 1: attachment, 2nd edn. Basic Books, New York
Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol 106:3–22. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X
Bruyer R, Brysbaert M (2011) Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)? Psychol Belg 51:5–13
Chartrand TL, van Baaren RB (2009) Human mimicry. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 41:219–274. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00405-X
Cook J, Bird G (2011) Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults. Exp Brain Res 211:601–612. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2584-4
Cook R, Bird G, Lünser G, Huck S, Heyes C (2012) Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proc R Soc B 279:780–786. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1024
Decety J, Sommerville JA (2009) In: Morsella E, Bargh JA, Gollwitzer PM (eds) Action representation as the bedrock of social cognition: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Oxford University Press, New York
Di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (1992) Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91:176–180. doi:10.1007/BF00230027
Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608–2611
Fernandez-Duque D, Knight M (2008) Cognitive control: dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:340–355. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.340
Friesen CK, Kingstone A (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5:490–495. doi:10.3758/BF03208827
Frith C (2007) The social brain? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:671–678. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2003
Ghazanfar AA, Santos LR (2004) Primate brains in the wild: the sensory bases for social interactions. Nat Rev Neuro 5:603–616. doi:10.1038/nrn1473
Hari R, Kujala MV (2009) Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Phys Rev 89:453–479. doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2007
Heyes C (2011) Automatic imitation. Psychol Bull 137:463–483. doi:10.1037/a0022288
Heyes C, Bird G, Johnson H, Haggard P (2005) Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cogn Brain Res 22:233–240. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.009
Hogeveen J, Obhi SS (2012) Social interaction enhances motor resonance for observed human actions. J Neurosci 32:5984–5989. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5938-11.2012
Iacoboni M (2009) Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu Rev Psychol 60:653–670. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
Johnson SC, Baxter LC, Wilder LS, Pipe JG, Heiserman JE, Prigatano GP (2002) Neural correlates of self reflection. Brain 125:1808–1814. doi:10.1093/brain/awf181
Johnson SC, Ok SJ, Luo Y (2007) The attribution of attention: 9-month-olds’ interpretation of gaze as goal-directed action. Dev Sci 10:530–537. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00606.x
Jonides J, Long J, Baddeley A (1981) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Kane MJ, Engle RW (2003) Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 132:47–70. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47
Keysers C, Gazzola V (2009) Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:666–671. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.10.006
Langton SRH, Bruce V (1999) Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Vis Cogn 6:541–567. doi:10.1080/135062899394939
Lin Z, Lin Y, Han S (2008) Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception. Biol Psychol 77:93–97. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.002
Maslow A (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50:370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
Melara RB, Algom D (2003) Driven by information: a tectonic theory of stroop effects. Psychol Rev 110:422–471. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.422
Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
Morf CC, Rhodewalt F (2001) Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: a dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychol Inq 12:177–196. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
Murphy FC, Klein R (1998) The effects of nicotine on spatial and non-spatial expectancies in a covert orienting task. Neuropsychologia 36:1103–1114. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00012-8
Obhi SS, Hogeveen J (2010) Incidental action observation modulates muscle activity. Exp Brain Res 203:427–435. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2253-z
Preston TP, Wilson M (2002) Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci 25:1–20. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018
Putzar L, Goerendt I, Lange K, Rösler F, Röder B (2007) Early visual deprivation impairs multisensory interactions in humans. Nat Neuro 10:1243–1245. doi:10.1038/nn1978
Raskin R, Hall CS (1981) The narcissistic personality inventory: alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. J Pers Assess 45:159–162. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4502_10
Raver CC (1996) Relations between social contingency in mother-child interaction and 2-year-olds’ social competence. Dev Psychol 32:850–859. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.32.5.850
Ritter K, Dziobek I, Preißler S, Rüter A, Vater A, Fydrich T, Lammers C, Heekeren HR, Roepke S (2011) Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psych Res 187:241–247. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.013
Rochat P (2006) What does it mean to be human? J Anthro Psychol 17:48–51
Romani M, Cesari P, Urgesi C, Facchini S, Aglioti SM (2005) Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during the observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements. Neuroimage 26:755–763. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.027
Shore DI, Barnes ME, Spence C (2006) Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neurosci Lett 392:96–100. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.001
Strafella AP, Paus T (2000) Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 11:2289–2292. doi:10.1097/00001756-200007140-00044
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
Teufel C, Alexis DM, Clayton NS, Davis G (2010) Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:695–705. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.695
Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, London
Tzelgov J, Henik A, Berger J (1992) Controlling stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Mem Cognit 20:727–735. doi:10.3758/BF03202722
Uithol S, van Rooij I, Bekkering H, Haselager P (2011) Understanding motor resonance. Soc Neurosci 6:388–397. doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.559129
Watson PJ, Morris RJ (1991) Narcissism, empathy and social desirability. Pers Individ Dif 12:575–579. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90253-8
Watson PJ, Sawrie SM, Greene RL, Arredondo R (2002) Narcissism and depression: MMPI-2 evidence for the continuum hypothesis in clinical samples. J Pers Assess 79:85–109. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7901_06
Wenke RJ, Olszewski D (2006) Patterns in prehistory: humankind’s first three million years, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Zbrodoff JN, Logan GD (1986) On the autonomy of mental processes: a case study in arithmetic. J Exp Psychol Gen 115:118–130. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.118
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant awarded to SSO. The authors thank Dr. Geoff Bird for providing the stimulus set for use in our experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hogeveen, J., Obhi, S.S. Automatic imitation is automatic, but less so for narcissists. Exp Brain Res 224, 613–621 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3339-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3339-6