Skip to main content
Log in

Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed the cutaneous encoding of two-dimensional movements by investigating the coding of movement velocity for differently oriented straight-line movements and the coding of complex trajectories describing cursive letters. The cutaneous feedback was then compared with that of the underlying muscle afferents previously recorded during the same “writing-like” movements. The unitary activity of 43 type II cutaneous afferents was recorded in the common peroneal nerve in healthy subjects during imposed ankle movements. These movements consisted first of ramp-and-hold movements imposed at two different and close velocities in seven directions and secondly of “writing-like” movements. In both cases, the responses were analyzed using the neuronal population vector model. The results show that movement velocity encoding depended on the direction of the ongoing movement. Discriminating between two velocities therefore involved processing the activity of afferent populations located in the various skin areas surrounding the moving joint, as shown by the statistically significant difference observed in the amplitude of the sum vectors. Secondly, “writing-like” movements induced cutaneous neuronal patterns of activity, which were reproducible and specific to each trajectory. Lastly, the “cutaneous neuronal trajectories,” built by adding the sum vectors tip-to-tail, nearly matched both the movement trajectories and the “muscle neuronal trajectories,” built from previously recorded muscle afferents. It was concluded that type II cutaneous and the underlying muscle afferents show similar encoding properties of two-dimensional movement parameters. This similarity is discussed in relation to a central gating process that would for instance increase the gain of cutaneous inputs when muscle information is altered by the fusimotor drive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aimonetti JM, Hospod V, Roll JP, Ribot-Ciscar E (2007) Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements. J Physiol 580:649–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert F, Ribot-Ciscar E, Fiocchi M, Bergenheim M, Roll JP (2005) Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses motor invariants during writing. Exp Brain Res 164:242–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergenheim M, Roll JP, Ribot-Ciscar E (1999) Microneurography in humans. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 801–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergenheim M, Ribot-Ciscar E, Roll JP (2000) Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: I. Muscle spindle feedback during spatially oriented movements. Exp Brain Res 134:301–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard C, Roll R, Roll JP, Kavounoudias A (2011) Combined contribution of tactile and proprioceptive feedback to hand movement perception. Brain Res 1382:219–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DF, Prochazka A (1996) Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand. J Physiol 496:857–871

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Gandevia SC (2000) Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint. J Physiol 529:505–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Todd G, Gandevia SC (2005) Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J Neurophysiol 94:1699–1706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordo PJ, Horn J-L, Künster D, Cherry A, Bratt A, Gurfinkel V (2011) Contributions of skin and muscle afferent input to movement sense in the human hand. J Neurophysiol 105:1879–1888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriou M, Edin BB (2010) Human muscle spindles act as forward sensory models. Curr Biol 20:1763–1767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB (1992) Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin. J Neurophysiol 67:1105–1113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB (2001) Cutaneous afferents provide information about knee joint movements in humans. J Physiol 531:289–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB (2004) Quantitative analyses of dynamic strain sensitivity in human skin mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol 92:3233–3243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB, Abbs JH (1991) Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand. J Neurophysiol 65:657–670

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB, Johansson N (1995) Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. J Physiol 487:243–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP (1990) Neural coding of the direction of reaching and a comparison with saccadic eye movements. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:849–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB (1972) Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution by muscle spindles to perception? Science 175:1382–1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grill SE, Hallett M (1995) Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J Physiol 489:593–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospod V, Aimonetti JM, Roll JP, Ribot-Ciscar E (2007) Changes in human muscle spindle sensitivity during a proprioceptive attention task. J Neurosci 27:5172–5178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Nordh E, Thelin AE, Vallbo AB (1979) The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J Physiol 291:233–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS (1978) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J Physiol 281:101–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KE, Wessberg J, Vallbo AB (2001) Directional tuning of human forearm muscle afferents during voluntary wrist movements. J Physiol 536:635–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll JP (2001) Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol 532:869–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavounoudias A, Roll JP, Anton JL, Nazarian B, Roth M, Roll R (2008) Proprio-tactile integration for kinesthetic perception: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 46:567–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knibestöl M (1975) Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol 245:63–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proske U, Gandevia SC (2009) The kinaesthetic senses. J Physiol 587:4139–4146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M, Roll JP (2002) The preferred sensory direction of muscle spindle primary endings influences the velocity coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 145:429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47:177–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP, Vedel JP, Ribot E (1989) Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res 76:213–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP, Bergenheim M, Ribot-Ciscar E (2000) Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: II. Muscle-spindle feedback during “drawing-like” movements. Exp Brain Res 134:311–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Roll JP (2002) Cutaneous afferents from human plantar sole contribute to body posture awareness. NeuroReport 13:1957–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roll JP, Albert F, Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M (2004) “Proprioceptive signature” of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding. Exp Brain Res 157:359–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo AB, Hagbarth KE (1968) Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. Exp Neurol 21:270–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo AB, Johansson RS (1984) Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum Neurobiol 3:3–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Association Française contre les Myopathies, and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. We are grateful to Guy Escoffier for his technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Aimonetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aimonetti, JM., Roll, JP., Hospod, V. et al. Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans. Exp Brain Res 221, 167–176 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3160-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3160-2

Keywords

Navigation