Skip to main content
Log in

Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the hands are the most important tool for humans to manipulate objects, only little is known about haptic processing of natural objects. Here, we selected a unique set of natural objects, namely seashells, which vary along a variety of object features, while others are shared across all stimuli. To correctly interact with objects, they have to be identified or categorized. For both processes, measuring similarities between objects is crucial. Our goal is to better understand the haptic similarity percept by comparing it to the visual similarity percept. First, direct similarity measures were analyzed using multidimensional scaling techniques to visualize the perceptual spaces of both modalities. We find that the visual and the haptic modality form almost identical perceptual spaces. Next, we performed three different categorization tasks. All tasks exhibit a highly accurate processing of complex shapes of the haptic modality. Moreover, we find that objects grouped into the same category form regions within the perceptual space. Hence, in both modalities, perceived similarity constitutes the basis for categorizing objects. Moreover, both modalities focus on shape to form categories. Taken together, our results lead to the assumption that the same cognitive processes link haptic and visual similarity perception and the resulting categorization behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, Zohary E (2001) Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat Neurosc 4(3):324–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borg I, Groenen P (1997) Modern multidimensional scaling. Springer, Berlin

  • Bushnell EW, Baxt C (1999) Children’s haptic, cross-modal recognition with familiar, unfamiliar objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perf 25(6):1867–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke T, Jäkel F, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2007) Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia 45(3):484–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke T, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2010) Multidimensional scaling analysis of haptic exploratory procedures. ACM Trans App Percept 4:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutzu F, Edelman S (1998) Representation of object similarity in human vision: psychophysics, a computational model. Vision Res 38(15–16):2229–2257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman S (1999) Representation and recognition in vision. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Gaissert N, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2010) Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans. J Vis 10(11:2):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone RL (1994) The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork. Cognition 52(2):125–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haag S (2011) Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects. Cognit Proc 12(1):33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn U, Ramscar M (2001) Similarity and categorization. In: Hahn U, Ramscar M (eds) Similarity and categorization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) Most people are not weird. Nature 466:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James TW, Kim S, Fisher JS (2007) The neural basis of haptic object processing. Can J Exp Psychol 61(3):219–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Metzger VA (1985) Identifying objects by touch: an “expert system”. Percept Psychophys 37:299–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey S, Tal N, Amedi A, Sathian K (2009a) A putative model of multisensory object representation. Brain Topogr 21(3–4):269–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey S, Pappas M, Kreps A, Lee K, Sathian K (2009b) Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations. Exp Brain Res 198(2–3):329–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1990) Haptic classification of common objects: knowledge-driven exploration. Cogn Psychol 22(4):421–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ et al (1990) Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects. Percept Psychophys 47(1):54–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species cum Carateribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio Decima, Reformata, vol 1 Regnum Animale. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm

  • Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1991) Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 20(2):167–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Ann Rev 32:89–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman JF, Norman HF, Clayton AM, Lianekhammy J, Zielke G (2004) The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Percept Psychophys 66(2):342–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman JF, Clayton AM, Norman HF, Crabtree CE (2008) Learning to perceive differences in solid shape through vision and touch. Perception 37(2):185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Op de Beeck HP, Torfs K, Wagemans J (2008) Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway. J Neurosci 28(40):10111–10123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmeri TJ, Gauthier I (2004) Visual object understanding. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(4):291–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisier MA, Tiest WM, Kappers AM (2009) Salient features in 3-D haptic shape perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(2):421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reales JM, Ballesteros S (1999) Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 25(3):644–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathian K, Zangaladze A, Hoffman JM, Grafton ST (1997) Feeling with the mind’s eye. Neuroreport 8(18):3877–3881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard RN (1987) Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237(4820):1317–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard RN (2001) Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Behav Brain Sci 24(4):581–601 (discussion 652–671)

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Horst BJ, Kappers AM (2008) Using curvature information in haptic shape perception of 3D objects. Exp Brain Res 190(3):361–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All seashells are items of loan from the natural history museum Stuttgart, Germany (Am Löwentor, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart). We thank Hans-Jörg Niederhöfer for providing the seashells and helping to select an adequate set of stimuli. This study was partially supported by the WCU (World Class University) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (R31-2008-000-10008-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Wallraven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaissert, N., Wallraven, C. Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities. Exp Brain Res 216, 123–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2916-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2916-4

Keywords

Navigation