Abstract
The authors determined the effects of changes in task demands on interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination. Participants performed a joint task in which one participant held a stick to which a circle was attached at the top (holding role), while the other held a pointer through the circle without touching its borders (pointing role). Experiment 1 investigated whether interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination varied depending on task difficulty. Results showed that interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination increased in degree and stability with increments in task difficulty. Experiment 2 explored the effects of individual constraints by increasing the balance demands of the task (one or both members of the pair stood in a less stable tandem stance). Results showed that interpersonal coordination increased in degree and stability as joint task demands increased and that coupling strength varied depending on joint and individual task constraints. In all, results suggest that interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination are affected by the nature of the task performed and the constraints it places on joint and individual performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All observations in the ANOVA on individual performance (intrapersonal CRQA and SD measures) were not independent given that members of a pair coordinated their movement in order to perform the joint precision task.
References
Amazeen PG, Schmidt RC, Turvey MT (1995) Frequency detuning of the phase entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements. Biol Cybern 72(6):511–518
Balasubramaniam R, Riley MA, Turvey MT (2000) Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. Gait Posture 11(1):12–24
Bernstein N (1967) Co-ordination and regulation of movements. Lancet 1(7500)
Black DR, Riley MA, McCord CK (2007) Synergies in intra-and interpersonal interlimb rhythmic coordination. Mot Control 11(4):348–373
Clark HH (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fowler CA, Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Shockley KD (2008) Language use, coordination, and the emergence of cooperative action. Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics, pp 261–279–354
Gatev P, Thomas S, Kepple T, Hallett M (1999) Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults. J Physiol—Lond 514(3):915–928
Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1966) On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (eds) Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 9–26
Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2006) The social nature of perception and action. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(3):99–104
Latash ML (2008) Neurophysiological basis of movement, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, Urbana
Marsh KL, Richardson MJ, Baron RM, Schmidt RC (2006) Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecol Psychol 18(1):1–38
Marsh KL, Richardson MJ, Schmidt RC (2009) Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Top Cogn Sci 1:320–339
Mitra S, Fraizer EV (2004) Effects of explicit sway-minimization on postural–suprapostural dual-task performance. Hum Mov Sci 23(1):1–20. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2004.03.003.pii:S0167945704000193
Oullier O, Deguzman G, Jantzen KJ, Lagarde J, Kelso JAS (2008) Social coordination dynamics: visual information exchange mediates spontaneous phase synchrony between people. Soc Neurosci 3:178–192
Pellecchia GL, Shockley K, Turvey MT (2005) Concurrent cognitive task modulates coordination dynamics. Cogn Sci 29(4):531–557
Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Shockley K, Baker AA (under review) Interpersonal and intrapersonal coordinative modes for joint and single task performance
Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA (1988) Affordances as constraints on the control of stance. Hum Mov Sci 7(2–4):265–300
Richardson D, Dale R (2005) Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cogn Sci (29):1045–1060
Richardson DC, Dale R, Kirkham NZ (2007a) The art of conversation is coordination—common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychol Sci 18(5):407–413
Richardson MJ, Schmidt RC, Kay BA (2007b) Distinguishing the noise and attractor strength of coordinated limb movements using recurrence analysis. Biol Cybern 96(1):59–78. doi:10.1007/S00422-006-0104-6
Richardson D, Dale R, Shockley K (2008) Synchrony and swing in conversation: coordination, temporal dynamics and communication. Embodied communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Schmidt RC (2010) Challenging egocentric notions of perceiving, acting and knowing. The mind in context. Guilford, New York
Riley MA, Stoffregen TA, Grocki MJ, Turvey MT (1999) Postural stabilization for the control of touching. Hum Mov Sci 18(6):795–817
Riley MA, Richardson MJ, Shockley K, Ramenzoni VC (2011) Interpersonal synergies. Front Psychol 2:38
Schmidt RC, O’brien B (1997) Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecol Psychol 9(3):189–206
Schmidt RC, Richardson MJ (2008) Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In: Jirsa AFV (ed) Coordination: neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Springer, Germany, pp 281–308
Schmidt RC, Turvey MT (1994) Phase-entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements. Biol Cybern 70(4):369–376
Schmidt RC, Carello C, Turvey MT (1990) Phase-transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. J Exp Psychol—Hum Percept Perform 16(2):227–247
Schmidt RC, Bienvenu M, Fitzpatrick P, Amazeen P (1998) A comparison of within- and between-person coordination: coordination breakdown and coupling strength. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform (24):884–900
Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10(2):70–76. doi:10.1016/J.Tics.2005.12.009
Shockley K (2005) Cross recurrence quantification of interpersonal postural activity. In: Orden MARGCV (ed) Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences, pp 142–177. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp. Retrieved 5 May 2005
Shockley K, Turvey MT (2005) Encoding and retrieval during bimanual rhythmic coordination. J Exp Psychol—Learn Mem Cogn 31(5):980–990. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.980
Shockley K, Turvey MT (2006) Dual-task influences on strategic retrieval and coordination dynamics. Psychon Bull Rev (13):985–990
Shockley K, Butwill M, Zbilut JP, Webber CL (2002) Cross recurrence quantification of coupled oscillators. Phys Lett A 305(1–2):59–69 (pii: S0375-9601(02)01411-1)
Shockley K, Santana MV, Fowler CA (2003) Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. J Exp Psychol—Hum Percept Perform 29(2):326–332. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326
Shockley K, Baker AA, Richardson MJ, Fowler CA (2007) Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. J Exp Psychol—Hum Percept Perform 33(1):201–208. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.201
Shockley K, Richardson DC, Dale R (2009) Conversation and coordinative structures. Top Cogn Sci 1(2):305–319
Stoffregen TA, Smart LJ, Bardy BG, Pagulayan RJ (1999) Postural stabilization of looking. J Exp Psychol—Hum Percept Perform 25(6):1641–1658
Stoffregen TA, Pagulayan RJ, Bardy BG, Hettinger LJ (2000) Modulating postural control to facilitate visual performance. Hum Mov Sci 19(2):203–220
Stoffregen TA, Giveans MR, Villard S, Yank JR, Shockley K (2009) Interpersonal postural coordination on rigid and non-rigid surfaces. Mot Control 13(4):471–483
Temprado JJ, Swinnen SP, Carson RG, Tourment A, Laurent M (2003) Interaction of directional, neuromuscular and egocentric constraints on the stability of preferred bimanual coordination patterns. Hum Mov Sci 22(3):339–363. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(03)00049-6
Turvey MT (1977) Contrasting orientations to theory of visual information-processing. Psychol Rev 84(1):67–88
Turvey MT (1990) Coordination. Am Psychol 45(8):938–953
Turvey MT, Shaw RE, Mace W (1978) Issues in the theory of action: degrees of freedom, coordinative structures and coalitions. In: Requin J (ed) Attention and performance VII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 567–595
Whiting HTA, Vogt S, Vereijken B (1992) Human skill and motor control: some aspects of the motor control-motor learning relation. In: Summers JJ (ed) Approaches to the study of motor control and learning. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 81–111
Wilson M, Knoblich G (2005) The case for motor involvement in perceiving co-specifics. Psychol Bull (131):460–473
Zbilut JP, Webber CL (1992) Embeddings and delays as derived from quantification of recurrence plots. Phys Lett A 171(3–4):199–203
Zbilut JP, Giuliani A, Webber CL (1998) Detecting deterministic signals in exceptionally noisy environments using cross-recurrence quantification. Phys Lett A 246(1–2):122–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramenzoni, V.C., Davis, T.J., Riley, M.A. et al. Joint action in a cooperative precision task: nested processes of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination. Exp Brain Res 211, 447–457 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2653-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2653-8