Skip to main content
Log in

The role of spatial attention in attentional control over pain: an experimental investigation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distraction is a common method of pain control that is often found to be effective. However, it is still largely unexplored which components of distraction are responsible for its effects. This study investigated the role of the spatial location of task-relevant stimuli in the effectiveness of distraction. Two experiments were performed in which the spatial location of visual stimuli during nociceptive input was manipulated. In a first experiment, we tested whether the reaction to nociceptive information is slower when visual stimuli are presented at a different spatial location than at the same spatial location. In a second experiment, we examined whether the manipulation of spatial location affects the experience of pain. Overall, results indicated that directing attention away from the pain location results in a slower response to painful stimuli and a reduction in pain. It may be concluded that the analgesic effect of distraction is at least partly the result of the spatial location of the distracting information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Analyses were also performed including only the women in the sample. Results did not differ significantly from those performed with the complete sample.

  2. Analyses were also performed including only the women in the sample. Results did not differ significantly from those performed with the complete sample.

References

  • Bantick SJ, Wise RG, Ploghaus A, Clare S, Smith SM, Tracey I (2002) Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI. Brain 125:310–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F (2006) Placebo analgesia. Neurol Sci 27:S100–S102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-analysis. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butter CM, Buchtel HA, Santucci R (1989) Spatial attentional shifts: further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli. Neuropsycholog 27:1231–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombez G, Eccleston C, Baeyens F, Eelen P (1998) Attentional disruption is enhanced by the threat of pain. Behav Res Ther 36:195–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowman R (2004) Electrophysiological indices of orienting attention toward pain. Psychophysiology 41:749–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccleston C (1995) The attentional control of pain: methodological and theoretical concerns. Pain 63:3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccleston C, Crombez G (1999) Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol Bull 125:356–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goubert L, Crombez G, Eccleston C, Devulder J (2004) Distraction from chronic pain during a pain inducing activity is associated with a greater post-activity pain. Pain 110:220–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard SA, Vogel EK, Luck SJ (1998) Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos T R Soc B 353:1257–1270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honoré J, Hénon H, Naveteur J (1995) Influence of eye orientation on pain as function of anxiety. Pain 63:213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama Y, Koyama T, Kroncke AP, Coghill RC (2004) Effects of stimulus duration on heat induced pain: the relationship between real-time and post- stimulus pain ratings. Pain 107:256–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legrain V, Guérit JM, Bruyer R, Plaghki L (2002) Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects of laser evoked potential. Pain 99:21–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legrain V, Perchet C, García-Larrea L (2009a) Involuntary orienting of attention to pain. Neural and behavioral signatures. J Neurophysiol 102:2423–2434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legrain V, Van Damme S, Eccleston C, Davis KD, Seminowicz DA, Crombez G (2009b) A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Pain 144:230–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal H (1992) I know distraction works even though it doesn’t! Health Psychol 11:208–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Spence C, Driver J (2003) Multisensory integration and body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr Biol 13:R531–R539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason P (2005) Deconstructing endogenous pain modulation. J Neurophysiol 94:1659–1663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCaul KD, Malott JM (1984) Distraction and coping with pain. Psychol Bull 95:516–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCaul KD, Monson N, Maki RH (1992) Does distraction reduce pain-produced distress among college students? Health Psychol 11:210–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miron D, Duncan GH, Bushnell MC (1989) Effects of attention on the intensity and unpleasantness of thermal pain. Pain 39:345–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosely LG, Arntz A (2007) The context of a noxious stimulus affects the pain it evokes. Pain 133:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouraux A, Iannetti GD (2009) Nociceptive Laser-evoked brain potentials do not reflect nociceptive-specific neural activity. J Neurophysiol 6:3258–3269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveteur J, Mars F, Crombez G (2005) The effect of eye orientation on slowly increasing pain. Eur J Pain 9:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic P, Petersson KM, Ghatan PH, Stone-Elander S, Ingvar M (2000) Pain-related cerebral activation is altered by a distracting cognitive task. Pain 85:19–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier DA, Katz J, Kahneman D (2003) Memories of colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Pain 104:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seminowicz DA, Davis KD (2007) A re-examination of pain-cognition interactions: implications for neuroimaging. Pain 130:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Gallace A (2007) Recent developments in the study of tactile attention. Can J Exp Psychol 61:196–2007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Nicholls MER, Gillespie N, Driver J (1998) Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Percept Psychophys 60:544–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Pavani F, Maravita A, Holmes N (2004) Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J Physiol-Paris 98:171–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey I, Mantyh PW (2007) The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron 55:377–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey I, Ploghaus A, Gati JS, Clare S, Smith S, Menon RS, Matthews PM (2002) Imaging attentional modulation of pain in the periaquaductal gray in humans. J Neurosci 22:2748–2752

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valet M, Sprenger T, Boecker H, Willoch F, Rummeney E, Conrad B, Erhard P, Tolle TR (2004) Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain–an fMRI-analysis. Pain 103:399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme S, Crombez G, Eccleston C, Goubert L (2004) Impaired disengagement from threatening cues of impending pain in a crossmodal cueing paradigm. Eur J Pain 8:227–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme S, Crombez G, Van Nieuwenborgh-De Wever K, Goubert G (2008) Is distraction less effective when pain is threatening? An experimental investigation with the cold pressor task. Eur J Pain 12:60–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme S, Legrain V, Vogt J, Crombez G (2010) Keeping pain in mind: a motivational account of attention to pain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vase L, Riley JL, Price DD (2002) A comparison of placebo effects in clinical analgesic trials versus studies of placebo analgesia. Pain 77:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villemure C, Bushnell MC (2009) Mood influences supraspinal pain processing separately from attention. J Neurosci 29:705–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Katleen Gardinael for her help in the data collection. Preparation of this paper was partly supported by Grant BOF/GOA2006/001 of Ghent University and FWO project G.017807. There are no conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitri M. L. Van Ryckeghem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Ryckeghem, D.M.L., Van Damme, S., Crombez, G. et al. The role of spatial attention in attentional control over pain: an experimental investigation. Exp Brain Res 208, 269–275 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2477-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2477-y

Keywords

Navigation