Skip to main content
Log in

ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have found that response inhibition in the stop signal task is associated with a delay in subsequent response speed, which may result from the automatic retrieval of a conflicting stimulus-goal association. This study investigated the neurophysiological correlates of this sequence effect using event related potentials (ERPs). ERPs were recorded in 17 healthy people while they performed the stop signal task. We found reduced P3b amplitude for responses following successful inhibition, but only when the stimulus was repeated from the previous trial (repetition-after-effects). For responses following failed inhibition, P3b amplitude was reduced regardless of stimulus repetition status. We also found a general increase in frontal N2 amplitude on response trials following inhibition, regardless of stimulus repetition or behavioural slowing. The complex pattern of ERP findings, dependent on stimulus repetition and success of inhibition, suggests multiple sources of behavioural slowing in the present data. ERP findings suggest that a memory retrieval processes underlies the repetition component of inhibition after effects. These findings are considered within the broader context of ERP findings in the negative priming literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchesne E, Hillyard SA, Galambos R (1975) Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39:131–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croft RJ, Barry RJ (1998) EOG correction: a new aligned-artifact average solution. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 107:395–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daurignac E, Houde O, Jouvent R (2006) Negative priming in a numerical Piaget-like task as evidenced by ERP. J Cogn Neurosci 18:730–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dejong R, Coles MGH, Logan GD, Gratton G (1990) In search of the point of no return—the control of response processes. J Exp Psychol Hum 16:164–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimoska A, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2004) The functional significance of ERP components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, conflict and error-detection. Aust J Psychol 56:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez-Geppert S, Konrad C, Pantev C, Huster RJ (2010) Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. Neuroimage 51:877–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enticott PG, Bradshaw JL, Bellgrove MA, Upton DJ, Ogloff JRP (2009) Stop task after-effects the extent of slowing during the preparation and execution of movement. Exp Psychol 56:247–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Näätänen RN (1998) Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10:590–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Christ S, Hohnsbein J (2000) ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol Psychol 51:87–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein JR, Van Petten C (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45:152–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frings C, Groh-Bordin C (2007) Electrophysiological correlates of visual identity negative priming. Brain Res 1176:82–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski PD, Kleinsorge T, & Falkenstein M (2009) Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs. Cortex

  • Gehring WJ, Bryck RL, Jonides J, Albin RL, Badre D (2003) The mind’s eye, looking inward? In search of executive control in internal attention shifting. Psychophysiology 40:572–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons H (2006) An event-related potential investigation of varieties of negative priming. J Psychophysiol 20:170–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons H (2009) Functional brain-electrical correlates of negative priming in the flanker task: evidence for episodic retrieval. Psychophysiology 46:807–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons H, Rammsayer TH, Stahl J (2006) Multiple sources of positive- and negative-priming effects: an event-related potential study. Memory Cogn 34:172–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa JA, Villarino A, Pozo MA, Elosua MR, Merino JM, Moreno E et al (2007) An event-related potentials study of identity positive and negative priming. Int J Psychophysiol 66:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa JA, Pozo MA, Mendez-Bertolo C, Luna D (2009) Event-related potential correlates of visual identity negative priming unbiased by trial-by-trial effects. Brain Cogn 69:531–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karayanidis F, Coltheart M, Michie PT, Murphy K (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology 40:329–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kathmann N, Bogdahn B, Endrass T (2006) Event-related brain potential variations during location and identity negative priming. Neurosci Lett 394:53–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kok A, Ramautar JR, De Ruiter MB, Band GPH, Ridderinkhof KR (2004) ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 41:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan G (1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev 95:492–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan GD, Cowan WB, Davis KA (1984) On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:276–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr S, Niedeggen M, Buchner A, Pietrowsky R (2003) ERP correlates of auditory negative priming. Cognition 90:B11–B21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken B, Joordens S, Merikle PM, Seiffert AE (1998) Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychol Rev 105:203–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neill WT (1977) Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:444–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill WT, Valdes LA, Terry KM, Gorfein DS (1992) Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18:993–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polich J (2007) Updating p300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2128–2148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger M, Gauggel S (1999) Inhibitory “after-effects” in the stop signal paradigm. [Journal Article]. Br J Psychol 90:509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermund K, Wentura D, De Houwer J (2005) Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. J Exp Psychol Learn 31:482–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmajuk M, Liotti M, Busse L, Woldorff MG (2006) Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia 44:384–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuch S, Tipper SP (2007) On observing another person’s actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors. Percept Psychophys 69:828–837

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl J, Gibbons H (2007a) Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task. Clin Neurophysiol 118:581–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl J, Gibbons H (2007b) Event-related brain potentials support episodic-retrieval explanations of flanker negative priming. Exp Brain Res 181:595–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swainson R, Cunnington R, Jackson GM, Rorden C, Peters AM, Morris PG et al (2003) Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching. J Cogn Neurosci 15:785–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper SP (1985) The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Q J Exp Psychol A 37:571–590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Boxtel GJM, van der Molen MW, Jennings JR, Brunia CHM (2001) A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol Psychol 58:229–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008a) After-effects of goal shifting and response inhibition: a comparison of the stop-change and dual-task paradigms. Q J Exp Psychol 61:1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008b) Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the Go/No-Go and stop-signal paradigms. J Exp Psychol Gen 137:649–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008c) Long-term after effects of response inhibition: memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control. J Exp Psychol Hum 34:1229–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009) Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. J Exp Psychol Learn 35:1381–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD, Liefooghe B, Vandierendonck A (2008a) Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments? J Exp Psychol Hum 34:413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Schneider DW, Logan GD (2008b) How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking. J Exp Psychol Hum 34:1212–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verleger R, Jaskowski P, Wascher E (2005) Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J Psychophysiol 19:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Verbruggen and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Upton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upton, D.J., Enticott, P.G., Croft, R.J. et al. ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task. Exp Brain Res 206, 351–358 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2369-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2369-1

Keywords

Navigation