Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size–weight illusion

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When lifting objects of identical mass but different sizes, people perceive the smaller objects as weighing more than the larger ones (the ‘size–weight’ illusion, SWI). While individual’s grip and load force rates are rapidly scaled to the objects’ actual mass, the magnitude of the force used to lift these SWI-inducing objects is rarely discussed. Here, we show that participants continue to apply a greater loading force to a large SWI-inducing cube than to a small SWI cube, lift after lift. These differences in load force persisted long after initial errors in grip and load force rates had been corrected. Interestingly, participants who showed the largest illusion made the smallest errors in load force. This unexpected relationship suggests that the motor system is consistently biased toward the expectations of heaviness for a particular stimulus in a Bayesian fashion, and that this loading error is subsequently reduced by SWI perceptual errors in the opposite direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brayanov JB, Smith MA (2010) Bayesian and “Anti-Bayesian” biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion. J Neurophysiol 103:1518–1531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham G, Goodale MA (2010) Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion. PLoS ONE 5(3):e9709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham G, Cant JS, Goodale MA (2009) Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. J Neurophysiol 102:3111–3118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang EC, Flanagan JR, Goodale MA (2008) The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight. Exp Brain Res 185:319–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charpentier A (1891) Analyse expérimentale: de quelques éléments de la sensation de poids. Arch Physiol Norm Pathol 3:122–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard PA, Large ME, Chang EC, Goodale MA (2009) Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: an fMRI investigation of the size-weight illusion. Neuroimage 44:200–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287:2036–2038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Beltzner MA (2000) Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion. Nat Neurosci 3:737–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Bittner JP, Johansson RS (2008) Experience can change distinct size–weight priors engaged when lifting objects and judging their weights. Curr Biol 18:1742–1747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geldard FA, Sherrick CE (1972) The cutaneous “rabbit”: a perceptual illusion. Science 178:178–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Westling G, Cole KJ, Johansson R (1993) Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. J Neurophysiol 69:1789–1796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy MS, Westwood DA (2006) Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size–weight illusion. J Neurophysiol 95:3887–3892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granit R (1972) Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement. Brain 95:451–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SR, Shaw A (2000) The Ponzo illusion affects gruo-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2009) Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:345–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita H, Backstrom L, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (1997) Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with a precision grip. J Neurophysiol 78:1619–1630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mawase F, Karniel A (2010) Evidence of predictive control in lifting series of virtual objects. Exp Brain Res 203:447–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, Murray AH (2000) The size of the visual cue used for programming manipulative forces during prehension grip. Exp Brain Res 135:405–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross HE (1969) When is a weight not illusory? Q J Exp Psychol 21:346–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Streit M, Shockley K, Riley M (2007) Rotational inertia and multimodal heaviness perception. Psychon Bull Rev 14:1001–1006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwislocki JJ, Goodman DA (1980) Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: a validation. Percept Psychophys 28:28–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jim Ladich for constructing the size–weight illusion cubes and Haitao Yang for technical support. The research was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant awarded to M. A. Goodale.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin Buckingham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckingham, G., Goodale, M.A. The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size–weight illusion. Exp Brain Res 205, 283–288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2353-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2353-9

Keywords

Navigation