Abstract
In two-choice reaction tasks for which stimulus location is irrelevant, crossing the hands typically does not alter the benefit for corresponding stimulus and response locations (the Simon effect), which implies location coding of responses. However, for auditory tasks in which a consistent mapping between responding hand and tone pitch is maintained, the Simon effect may become smaller for crossed than uncrossed hands with practice, suggesting increased reliance on anatomical coding. Two experiments tested this possibility. In Exp. 1, the Simon effect tended to be smaller with crossed than uncrossed hands in the second half of 1,600 trials but not in the first half. Experiment 2 showed that this result was not due to reinstructing subjects mid-experiment about the consistent mapping of stimuli to hands. Although the Simon effect was apparent with crossed hands throughout both experiments, it tended to be slightly smaller than the effect obtained with uncrossed hands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heister G, Ehrenstein WH, Schroeder-Heister P (1987) Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location. Percept Psychophys 42:195–201
Hommel B (1993) Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychol Res 55:270–279
Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2006) Stimulus-response compatibility principles: data, theory and application. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Riggio L, Gawryszewski L, Umiltà C (1986) What is crossed in crossed-hands effects? Acta Psychol 62:89–100
Röder B, Kusmierek A, Spence C, Schicke T (2007) Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4753–4758
Roswarski TE, Proctor RW (2000) Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence? Psychol Res 63:48–158
Roswarski TE, Proctor RW (2003) The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect. Psychol Res 67:43–55
Rubichi S, Nicoletti R (2006) The Simon effect and handedness: evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding. Percept Psychophys 68:1059–1069
Simon JR (1990) The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG (eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 31–86
Simon JR, Hinrichs JV, Craft JL (1970) Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. J Exp Psychol 86:97–102
Wallace RJ (1971) S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J Exp Psychol 88:354–360
Wascher E, Schatz U, Kuder T, Verleger R (2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 27:731–751
Acknowledgments
We thank Motonori Yamaguchi for assistance in setting up the experiments and analyzing the data, and Bernhard Hommel and Kim-Phuong L. Vu for comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Both R. W. Proctor and C. Shao contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Proctor, R.W., Shao, C. Does the contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence to the auditory Simon effect increase with practice?. Exp Brain Res 204, 131–137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2284-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2284-5