Skip to main content
Log in

Does the contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence to the auditory Simon effect increase with practice?

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In two-choice reaction tasks for which stimulus location is irrelevant, crossing the hands typically does not alter the benefit for corresponding stimulus and response locations (the Simon effect), which implies location coding of responses. However, for auditory tasks in which a consistent mapping between responding hand and tone pitch is maintained, the Simon effect may become smaller for crossed than uncrossed hands with practice, suggesting increased reliance on anatomical coding. Two experiments tested this possibility. In Exp. 1, the Simon effect tended to be smaller with crossed than uncrossed hands in the second half of 1,600 trials but not in the first half. Experiment 2 showed that this result was not due to reinstructing subjects mid-experiment about the consistent mapping of stimuli to hands. Although the Simon effect was apparent with crossed hands throughout both experiments, it tended to be slightly smaller than the effect obtained with uncrossed hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Heister G, Ehrenstein WH, Schroeder-Heister P (1987) Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location. Percept Psychophys 42:195–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (1993) Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychol Res 55:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2006) Stimulus-response compatibility principles: data, theory and application. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio L, Gawryszewski L, Umiltà C (1986) What is crossed in crossed-hands effects? Acta Psychol 62:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röder B, Kusmierek A, Spence C, Schicke T (2007) Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4753–4758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roswarski TE, Proctor RW (2000) Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence? Psychol Res 63:48–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roswarski TE, Proctor RW (2003) The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect. Psychol Res 67:43–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubichi S, Nicoletti R (2006) The Simon effect and handedness: evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding. Percept Psychophys 68:1059–1069

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon JR (1990) The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG (eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 31–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon JR, Hinrichs JV, Craft JL (1970) Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. J Exp Psychol 86:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RJ (1971) S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J Exp Psychol 88:354–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wascher E, Schatz U, Kuder T, Verleger R (2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 27:731–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Motonori Yamaguchi for assistance in setting up the experiments and analyzing the data, and Bernhard Hommel and Kim-Phuong L. Vu for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Proctor.

Additional information

Both R. W. Proctor and C. Shao contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proctor, R.W., Shao, C. Does the contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence to the auditory Simon effect increase with practice?. Exp Brain Res 204, 131–137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2284-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2284-5

Keywords

Navigation