Skip to main content
Log in

The functional architecture of the human body: assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated mental representations of body parts and body-related activities in two subjects with congenitally absent limbs (one with, the other without phantom sensations), a wheelchair sports group of paraplegic participants, and two groups of participants with intact limbs. To analyse mental representation structures, we applied Structure Dimensional Analysis. Verbal labels indicating body parts and related activities were presented in randomized lists that had to be sorted according to a hierarchical splitting paradigm. Participants were required to group the items according to whether or not they were considered related, based on their own body perception. Results of the groups of physically intact and paraplegic participants revealed separate clusters for the lower body, upper body, fingers and head. The participant with congenital phantom limbs also showed a clear separation between upper and lower body (but not between fingers and hands). In the participant without phantom sensations of the absent arms, no such modularity emerged, but the specific practice of his right foot in communication and daily routines was reflected. Sorting verbal labels of body parts and activities appears a useful method to assess body representation in individuals with special body anatomy or function and leads to conclusions largely compatible with other assessment procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson AS, Feibel A (1981) The phantom phenomenon: its use and disuse. Bull NY Acad Med 57:99–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anema HA, Kessels RPC, de Haan EHF, Kappelle LJ, Leijten FS, van Zandvoort MJE, Martine JE, Dijkerman HC (2008) Differences in finger localisation performance in patients with finger agnosia. Neuroreport 19:1429–1433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benton AL (1959) Right-left discrimination and finger localisation: development and pathology. Hoeber-Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G, Aglioti S (1997) The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends Neurosci 20:560–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G, Aglioti S (2010) The body in the brain revisited. Exp Brain Res 200:25–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bläsing B, Tenenbaum G, Schack T (2009) Cognitive structure of movement in classical dance. Psychol Sport Exerc 10:350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Schack T, Marcellis RG, Oti KC, Schols JM, Wade DT (2007) Is it possible to use the structural dimension analysis of motor memory (SDA-M) to investigate representations of motor actions in stroke patients? Clin Rehabil 21:822–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brugger P, Funk M (2007) Out on a limb: neglect and confabulation in the study of aplasic phantoms. In: Della Sala S (ed) Tall tales about the mind and brain. Separating fact from fiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 348–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugger P, Kollias S, Müri M, Crelier G, Hepp-Reymond M-C, Regard M (2000) Beyond re-membering: Phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. PNAS 97:6167–6172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers G (2008a) Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Conscious Cogn 17:1302–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers G (2008b) Reply to Tsakiris and Fotopoulou “Is my body the sum of online and offline representations?”. Conscious Cogn 17:1321–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper LA, Shepard RN (1975) Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 104:48–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Rumiati RI (2007) What the brain knows about the body: evidence for dissociable representations. In: Santoianni F, Sabatano C (eds) Brain development in learning environments: embodied and perceptual advancements. Cambridge Scholar Publishing, Newcastle, pp 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Tessari A (2010) Is the body in the eye of the beholder? Visual processing of bodies in individuals with anomalous anatomical sensory and motor features. Neuropsychologia 48:689–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Hesse MD, Rumiati RI, Fink G (2008) Where is the nose with respect to a foot? The left posterior parietal cortex processes spatial relationships among body parts. Cereb Cortex 18:2879–2890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Tomasino B, Fink G (2009) What is the position of an arm relative to the body? Neural correlates of body schema and body structural description. J Neurosci 29:4162–4171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vignemont F (2010) Body schema and body image–pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48:669–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vignemont F, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) Body mereology. In: Knoblich G, Thornton IM, Grosjean M, Shiffrar M (eds) Human body perception from the inside out. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 147–170

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vignemont F, Majid A, Jola C, Haggard P (2009) Segmenting the body into parts: evidence from biases in tactile perception. Q J Exp Psychol 62:500–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkerman HC, de Haan EHF (2007) Somatosensory processing subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 30:189–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk M, Brugger P (2008) Mental rotation of congenitally absent hands. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 14:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk M, Shiffrar M, Brugger P (2005) Hand movement observation by individuals born without hands: phantom limb experience constrains visual limb perception. Exp Brain Res 164:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola V, van der Worp H, Mulder T, Wicker B, Rizzolatti G, Keysers C (2007) Aplasics born without hands mirror the goal of hand actions with their feet. Curr Biol 17:1235–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giummarra MJ, Gibson SJ, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Bradshaw JL (2007) Central mechanisms in phantom limb perceptions: the past, present and future. Brain research reviews 54:219–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes J, Decety J (2001) Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a metaanalysis. Hum Brain Mapp 12:1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wolpert DM (2005) Disorders of body scheme. In: Freund H-J, Jeannerod M, Hallett M, Leiguarda RC (eds) Higher order motor disorders. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Kitadono K, Press C, Taylor-Clarke M (2006) The brain’s fingers and hands. Exp Brain Res 172:94–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauk H, Johnsrude I, Pulvermüller F (2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41:301–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head H, Holmes G (1911) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesion. Brain 34:102–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilti L, Brugger P (2009) Incarnation and animation: physical versus representational deficits of body integrity. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2043-7

  • Kinsbourne M, Warrington EK (1962) A study of finger agnosia. Brain 85:47–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lander H-J, Lange K (1996) Untersuchung zur Struktur- und Dimensionsanalyse begrifflich repraesentierten Wissens. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 204:55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image–a double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J (eds) Motor control. Today and tomorrow. Academic Publishing House ‘Prof M. Drinov’, Sofia, pp 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons LM (1994) Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:709–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC, Jerabek PA, Lancaster JL (1995) Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375:54–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price EH (2006) A critical review of congenital phantom limb cases and a development theory for the basis of body image. Conscious Cogn 94:2367–2374

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL, Farah MJ (1995) The psychological reality of the body scema: a test with normal participants. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:334–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL, McGoldrick JE, Shackelford JR, Fidopiastis CM (2004) Are human bodies represented differently from other objects? Experience shapes object representations. Vis Cogn 11:523–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack T (2001) On the structure of movement representations – theoretical assumptions and methodical approach. Motor Control Learn (E-Journal). ISSN: 1439-7919 ISSN: 1439-79191–12; available from: http://www.ejournalbut.de/Journal/index.asp

  • Schack T (2004a) The cognitive architecture of complex movement. Int J Sport Exercise Psychol 2:403–438 Special Issue Part II

    Google Scholar 

  • Schack T (2004b) Relation of knowledge and performance in action. J Knowl Manage 8:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack T (2010) A method for measuring mental representation. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund R, Kamata A (eds.) Handbook of measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Human kinetics, Champaign, IL, in press; available from: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/sport/arbeitsbereiche/ab_ii/publications/schack_pub.html

  • Schack T, Mechsner F (2006) Representation of motor skills in human longterm memory. Neurosci Lett 391:77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwoebel J, Coslett HB (2005) Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J Cogn Neurosci 17:543–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2003) Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition 88:B11–B21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrar M, Freyd JJ (1990) Apparent motion of the human body. Psychol Sci 1:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirigu A, Grafman J, Bressler K, Sunderland T (1991) Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain 114:629–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank A.Z. and C.L. and all other participants for their cooperation. We thank Christian Schütz for help with the data acquisition in the wheelchair sports groups, Glenn Carruthers and Adrian J. T. Smith for fruitful discussions and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was partly funded by the Center of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) at Bielefeld University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bettina Bläsing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bläsing, B., Schack, T. & Brugger, P. The functional architecture of the human body: assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities. Exp Brain Res 203, 119–129 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2216-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2216-4

Keywords

Navigation