Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Switching between gap and overlap pro-saccades: cost or benefit?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triggering of saccades depends on the task: in the gap task, fixation point switches off and target appears after a gap period; in the overlap task, target appears while fixation point is still on. Saccade latencies are shorter in the gap task, due to fixation disengagement and advanced movement preparation during the gap. The two modes of initiation are also hypothesized to be subtended by different cortical-subcortical circuits. This study tested whether interleaving the two tasks modifies latencies, due to switching between different modes of triggering. Two groups of healthy participants (21–29 vs. 39–55 years) made horizontal and vertical saccades in gap, overlap, and mixed tasks; saccades were recorded with the Eyelink. Both groups showed shorter latencies in the gap task, i.e. a robust gap effect and systematic differences between directions. For young adults, interleaving tasks made the latencies shorter or longer depending on direction, while for middle-age adults, latencies became longer for all directions. Our observations can be explained in the context of models such as that of Brown et al. (Neural Netw 17:471–510, 2004), which proposed that different combinations of frontal eye field (FEF) layers, interacting with cortico-subcortical areas, control saccade triggering in gap and overlap trials. Moreover, we suggest that in early adulthood, the FEF is functioning optimally; frequent changes of activity in the FEF can be beneficial, leading to shorter latencies, at least for some directions. However, for middle-age adults, frequent changes of activity of a less optimally functioning FEF can be time consuming. Studying the alternation of gap and overlap tasks provides a fine tool to explore development, aging and disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton JJ, Cherkasova MV, Lindgren K, Goff DC, Intriligator JM, Manoach DS (2002) Antisaccades and task switching: studies of control processes in saccadic function in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 956:250–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton JJ, Greenzang C, Hefter R, Edelman J, Manoach DS (2006) Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm. Exp Brain Res 168:76–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belleville S, Bherer L, Lepage E, Chertkow H, Gauthier S (2008) Task switching capacities in persons with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 46:2225–2233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bojko A, Kramer AF, Peterson MS (2004) Age equivalence in switch costs for prosaccade and antisaccade tasks. Psychol Aging 19:226–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JW, Bullock D, Grossberg S (2004) How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades. Neural Netw 17:471–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron IG, Watanabe M, Munoz DP (2007) Contrasting instruction change with response change in task switching. Exp Brain Res 182:233–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkasova MV, Manoach DS, Intriligator JM, Barton JJ (2002) Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing. Exp Brain Res 144:528–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coubard O, Daunys G, Kapoula Z (2004) Gap effects on saccade and vergence latency. Exp Brain Res 154:368–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorris MC, Pare M, Munoz DP (1997) Neuronal activity in monkey superior colliculus related to the initiation of saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci 17:8566–8579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JM, Walker R (1999) A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behav Brain Sci 22:661–674 discussion 674-721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer B, Weber H, Biscaldi M, Aiple F, Otto P, Stuhr V (1993) Separate populations of visually guided saccades in humans: reaction times and amplitudes. Exp Brain Res 92:528–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldring J, Fischer B (1997) Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks. Exp Brain Res 113:88–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanes DP, Schall JD (1996) Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science 274:427–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanes DP, Thompson KG, Schall JD (1995) Relationship of presaccadic activity in frontal eye field and supplementary eye field to saccade initiation in macaque: Poisson spike train analysis. Exp Brain Res 103:85–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Isoda M (2008) Brain mechanisms for switching from automatic to controlled eye movements. Prog Brain Res 171:375–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson TL, Golding C, Molyva D, Rosenthal CR, Kennard C (2004) Reflexive, symbolic, and affective contributions to eye movements during task switching: response selection. J Cogn Neurosci 16:318–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honda H, Findlay JM (1992) Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: dependence of saccadic latency on target location. Percept Psychophys 52:167–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt AR, Klein RM (2002) Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration. Mem Cognit 30:529–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isa T, Kobayashi Y (2004) Switching between cortical and subcortical sensorimotor pathways. Prog Brain Res 143:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jersild A (1927) Mental set and shift. Arch Psychol 89:5–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston K, Everling S (2008) Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of reflexive and voluntary saccades in non-human primates. Brain Cogn 68:271–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone A, Klein RM (1993) Visual offsets facilitate saccadic latency: does predisengagement of visuospatial attention mediate this gap effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1251–1265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RM, Taylor TL, Kingstone A (1995) Against a role for attentional disengagement in the gap effect: a friendly amendment to Tam and Stelmach (1993). Percept Psychophys 57:573–577

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh RJ, Zee DS (2006) The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna B, Thulborn KR, Munoz DP, Merriam EP, Garver KE, Minshew NJ, Keshavan MS, Genovese CR, Eddy WF, Sweeney JA (2001) Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. Neuroimage 13:786–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manoach DS, Lindgren KA, Cherkasova MV, Goff DC, Halpern EF, Intriligator J, Barton JJ (2002) Schizophrenic subjects show deficient inhibition but intact task switching on saccadic tasks. Biol Psychiatry 51:816–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz DP, Broughton JR, Goldring JE, Armstrong IT (1998) Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 121:391–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler H (2000) Task switching and multitask performance. In: Monsell S, Driver J (eds) Attention and performance XVIII: control of mental processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 277–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Previc FH (1990) Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13:519–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivaud-Pechoux S, Vidailhet M, Brandel JP, Gaymard B (2007) Mixing pro- and antisaccades in patients with parkinsonian syndromes. Brain 130:256–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfs M, Vitu F (2007) On the limited role of target onset in the gap task: support for the motor-preparation hypothesis. J Vis 7:7.1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross LE, Ross SM (1980) Saccade latency and warning signals: stimulus onset, offset, and change as warning events. Percept Psychophys 27:251–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross SM, Ross LE (1981) Saccade latency and warning signals: effects of auditory and visual stimulus onset and offset. Percept Psychophys 29:429–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saslow MG (1967) Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. J Opt Soc Am 57:1024–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller PH, Tehovnik EJ (2005) Neural mechanisms underlying target selection with saccadic eye movements. Prog Brain Res 149:157–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovin H, Abeles M, Vaadia E, Haalman I, Prut Y, Bergman H (1999) Frontal cognitive impairments and saccadic deficits in low-dose MPTP-treated monkeys. J Neurophysiol 81:858–874

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi M, Frohman EM, Zee DS (1995) Gap-overlap effects on latencies of saccades, vergence and combined vergence-saccades in humans. Vision Res 35:3373–3388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tam WJ, Ono H (1994) Fixation disengagement and eye-movement latency. Percept Psychophys 56:251–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tam WJ, Stelmach LB (1993) Viewing behavior: ocular and attentional disengagement. Percept Psychophys 54:211–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tzelepi A, Yang Q, Kapoula Z (2005) The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the latencies of vertical saccades. Exp Brain Res 164:67–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Donkelaar P, Saavedra S, Woollacott M (2007) Multiple saccades are more automatic than single saccades. J Neurophysiol 97:3148–3151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Bucci MP, Kapoula Z (2002) The latency of saccades, vergence, and combined eye movements in children and in adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2939–2949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Kapoula Z, Debay E, Coubard O, Orssaud C, Samson M (2006) Prolongation of latency of horizontal saccades in elderly is distance and task specific. Vision Res 46:751–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zee DS (2004) Neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-otology. Curr Opin Neurol 17:1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Barash S (2000) Neuronal switching of sensorimotor transformations for antisaccades. Nature 408:971–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the reviewers for their comments, Antoine VERNET and Lea-Laetitia PONTANI for improving English in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IRIS Laboratory, CNRS, FRE 3154, Service d’ophtalmologie, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (Univ. Paris V), 20, rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France

    Marine Vernet, Qing Yang & Zoï Kapoula

  2. University of Pierre and Marie Curie (Paris VI), Paris, France

    Marine Vernet, Marie Gruselle & Mareike Trams

Authors
  1. Marine Vernet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie Gruselle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mareike Trams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zoï Kapoula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marine Vernet.

Additional information

M. Vernet and Z. Kapoula contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernet, M., Yang, Q., Gruselle, M. et al. Switching between gap and overlap pro-saccades: cost or benefit?. Exp Brain Res 197, 49–58 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1887-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1887-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation