Abstract
Is the motor system involved in language processing? In order to clarify this issue, we carried out three behavioral experiments, using go–no-go and choice paradigms. In all the experiments, we used a semantic decision task with an early delivery of the go signal (during processing language material). Italian verbs expressing hand actions, foot actions or an abstract content served as stimuli. Participants executed intransitive (Experiment 1) or transitive (Experiment 2) actions with their right hand in response to the acoustic presentation of action-related verbs and refrained from responding to abstract verbs. The kinematics of the actions was slowed down by hand action-related verbs when compared with foot action-related verbs. In Experiment 3, hand-related and foot-related verbs were presented. Participants responded to hand-related and foot-related verbs with their hand and their foot (compatible condition) and in another block of trials they responded to hand-related and foot-related verbs with their foot and their hand (incompatible condition), respectively. In the compatible condition, the beginning of the action was faster, whereas the kinematics of the action was slower. The present findings suggest complete activation of verb-related motor programs during language processing. The data are discussed in support of the hypothesis that this complete activation is necessary requisite to understand the exact meaning of action words because goal and consequence of the actions are represented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bak TH, O’Donovan DG, Xuereb JH, Boniface S, Hodges JR (2001) Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neurone disease-dementia-aphasia syndrome. Brain 124(Pt 1):103–120
Barbieri F, Buonocore A, Bernardis P, Dalla Volta R, Gentilucci M (2007) On the relations between affordance and representation of the agent’s effector. Exp Brain Res 180:421–433
Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577–660
Boulenger V, Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Deprez V, Jeannerod M, Nazir TA (2006) Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 ms of processing. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1607–1615
Buccino G, Riggio L, Melli G, Binkofski F, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2005) Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioural study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:355–363
Fischer MH, Zwaan RA (2008) Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol 61:825–850
Fodor JA (1975) The language of thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gallese V, Lakoff G (2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory–motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol 22:455–479
Gentilucci M (2003) Object motor representation and language. Exp Brain Res 153:260–265
Gentilucci M, Gangitano M (1998) Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. Eur J Neurosci 10:752–756
Gentilucci M, Toni I, Chieffi S, Pavesi G (1994) The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Exp Brain Res 99:483–500
Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M (2000) Language and motor control. Exp Brain Res 133:468–490
Glenberg AM (1997) What memory is for. Behav Brain Sci 20:1–55
Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev 9:558–565
Hauk O, Johnsrunde I, Pulvermüller F (2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41:301–307
Hauk O, Shtyrov Y, Pulvermüller F (2008) The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology. J Physiol Paris 102:50–58
Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14:S104–S109
Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Laudanna A, Thornton AM, Brown G, Burani C, Marconi L (1995) Un corpus dell'italiano scritto contemporaneo dalla parte del ricevente. In: Bolasco S, Lebart L, Salem A (eds) III Giornate internazionali di Analisi Statistica dei Dati Testuali, Volume I. Cisu, Roma, pp 103–109
Mahon BZ, Caramazza A (2008) A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J Physiol Paris 102:59–70
Marslen-Wilson WD (1990) Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: Altman GTM (ed) Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 148–172
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–114
Pulvermüller F (2002) The neuroscience of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pulvermüller F (2005) Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neur 6:576–582
Pulvermüller F, Shtyrov Y (2006) Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Prog Neurobiol 79:49–71
Pulvermüller F, Härle M, Hummel F (2001) Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain Lang 78:143–168
Sato M, Mengarelli M, Riggio L, Gallese V, Buccino G (2008) Task related processing of the motor system during language processing. Brain Lang 105:83–90
Scorolli C, Borghi AM (2007) Sentence comprehension and action: effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Res 1130:119–124
Shtyrov Y, Hauk O, Pulvermüller F (2004) Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: the mismatch negativity to action words. Eur J Neurosci 19:1083–1092
Tettamanti M, Buccino G, Saccuman MC, Gallese V, Danna M, Scifo P, Fazio F, Rizzolatti G, Cappa SF, Perani D (2005) Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. J Cogn Neurosci 17:273–281
Zwaan RA (2004) The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In: Ross BH (ed) Psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–62
Zwaan RA, Taylor LJ (2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. J Exp Psychol Gen 135:1–11
Acknowledgments
We thank Giovanni Buccino for discussion of data. The work was supported by grants from MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca) to M. G.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Linguistic material used in the three experiments. For each item, category, number of letters, syllables, isolation point, acoustic duration and lexical frequency (number of occurrences per million—Laudanna et al. 1995) are listed. In the rightmost column, English translations are given.
Name | Category | Letters | Syllables | IP (s) | AD (s) | LF | Translation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tagliare | Hand-related | 8 | 3 | 0.45 | 1.21 | 3.03 | To hack |
Firmare | Hand-related | 7 | 3 | 0.6 | 1.25 | 15.76 | To sign |
Disegnare | Hand-related | 9 | 4 | 0.68 | 1.35 | 9.09 | To draw |
Ricamare | Hand-related | 8 | 4 | 0.66 | 1.33 | 2.12 | To embroider |
Applaudire | Hand-related | 10 | 4 | 0.77 | 1.54 | 3.33 | To applaud |
Stappare | Hand-related | 8 | 3 | 0.72 | 1.4 | 0 | To uncap |
Svitare | Hand-related | 7 | 3 | 0.57 | 1.28 | 0 | To unscrew |
Timbrare | Hand-related | 8 | 3 | 0.51 | 1.21 | 1.21 | To stamp |
Rammendare | Hand-related | 10 | 4 | 1.01 | 1.8 | 0.3 | To mend |
Sbottonare | Hand-related | 10 | 4 | 0.85 | 1.68 | 0 | To unbutton |
Correre | Foot-related | 7 | 3 | 0.52 | 1.12 | 58.18 | To run |
Camminare | Foot-related | 9 | 4 | 0.56 | 1.35 | 28.18 | To walk |
Calpestare | Foot-related | 10 | 4 | 0.87 | 1.6 | 1.82 | To trample |
Marciare | Foot-related | 8 | 3 | 0.65 | 1.34 | 3.33 | To walk |
Inciampare | Foot-related | 10 | 4 | 0.85 | 1.61 | 0.91 | To stumble |
Calciare | Foot-related | 8 | 3 | 0.62 | 1.33 | 0.91 | To kick |
Saltellare | Foot-related | 10 | 4 | 0.86 | 1.5 | 0.61 | To jump |
Pattinare | Foot-related | 9 | 4 | 0.67 | 1.4 | 0.3 | To skate |
Pedalare | Foot-related | 8 | 4 | 0.5 | 1.28 | 2.73 | To pedal |
Zoppicare | Foot-related | 9 | 4 | 0.75 | 1.58 | 0 | To hobble |
Amare | Abstract | 5 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.97 | 26.97 | To love |
Odiare | Abstract | 6 | 3 | 0.41 | 1.2 | 1.82 | To hate |
Godere | Abstract | 6 | 3 | 0.38 | 1.05 | 16.06 | To enjoy |
Scordare | Abstract | 8 | 3 | 0.74 | 1.46 | 2.42 | To forget |
Temere | Abstract | 6 | 3 | 0.38 | 1.16 | 13.64 | To fear |
Meditare | Abstract | 8 | 4 | 0.69 | 1.44 | 1.82 | To meditate |
Contemplare | Abstract | 11 | 4 | 0.99 | 1.75 | 3.94 | To contemplate |
Ammirare | Abstract | 8 | 4 | 0.76 | 1.49 | 13.33 | To admire |
Sopportare | Abstract | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1.72 | 20 | To bear |
Approvare | Abstract | 9 | 4 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 10.91 | To approve |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalla Volta, R., Gianelli, C., Campione, G.C. et al. Action word understanding and overt motor behavior. Exp Brain Res 196, 403–412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1864-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1864-8