Skip to main content
Log in

Electroencephalographic correlates of target and outcome errors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different neural systems underlie the evaluation of different types of errors. Recent electroencephalographic evidence suggests that outcome errors—errors indicating the failure to achieve a movement goal—are evaluated within medial-frontal cortex (Krigolson and Holroyd 2006, 2007a, b). Conversely, evidence from a variety of manual aiming studies has demonstrated that target errors—discrepancies between the actual and desired motor command brought about by an unexpected change in the movement environment—are mediated within posterior parietal cortex (e.g., Desmurget et al. 1999, 2001; Diedrichsen et al. 2005). Here, event-related brain potentials (ERP) were recorded to assess medial-frontal and parietal ERP components associated with the evaluation of outcome and target errors during performance of a manual aiming task. In line with previous results (Krigolson and Holroyd 2007a), we found that target perturbations elicited an ERP component with a parietal scalp distribution, the P300. However, the timing of kinematic changes associated with accommodation of the target perturbations relative to the timing of the P300 suggests that the P300 component was not related to the online control of movement. Instead, we believe that the P300 evoked by target perturbations reflects the updating of an internal model of the movement environment. Our results also revealed that an error-related negativity, an ERP component typically associated with the evaluation of speeded response errors and error feedback, was elicited when participants missed the movement target. Importantly, this result suggests that a reinforcement learning system within medial-frontal cortex may play a role in improving subsequent motor output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Onset procedures such as the one we employed here are not typically used on acceleration data in this manner. However, we felt that this was a viable technique for identifying when participants began to correct for the target perturbation. Furthermore, this technique allowed for a direct comparison with the ERP data.

  2. Note that due to the inherent difficulties in single trial ERP analysis we were unable to get an onset value of the P300 for each trial, or for that matter even for individual subjects, and so could not compare this quantity with single-trial acceleration values.

  3. The constant and variable error values reported here for the blocked condition reflect the final endpoint of the participants’ stylus. As the cursor was locked to the horizontal axis in this condition, the vertical error associated with the final cursor location was simply the distance from the midline to the target. Additionally, as there was no variation in the vertical cursor position the variable error of the cursor was always zero.

  4. It is worth noting that a much slower ERN may have been elicited following the corrective movements as participants may have been slow to detect the error in the presence of conflicting feedback. Indeed, the reinforcement learning theory of the ERN would predict this—an ERN should be elicited at the earliest indicator that events are worse than expected (Holroyd and Coles 2002). If participants were not able to evaluate the response itself, then feedback (whenever it is determined) would elicit an ERN. However, in this case participants may have detected the error at different times during the movement trajectory. Given the methodology of the present experiment it is not possible to ascertain whether such temporal instability in fact occurred.

References

  • Calhoun VD, Adali T, Pearlson GD, Kiehl KA (2006) Neuronal chronometry of target detection: fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data. Neuroimage 30(2):544–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153(2):180–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan P, Yu AJ (2006) Phasic norepinephrine: a neural interrupt signal for unexpected events. Network 17:335–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme A, Makeig S (1994) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2(6):563–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cog Sci 4:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grea H, Grethe JS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (2001) Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 21(8):2919–2928

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy YL, Rane T, Shadmehr R (2005) Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25:9919–9931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dien J (2006) Progressing towards a consensus on PCA of ERPs. Clin Neurophysiol 117(3):699–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2003) Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Cogn Brain Res 17:637–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2004) Parsing the “Late Positive Complex”: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology 41(5):665–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11:355–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, Blanke L (1991) Effects of crossmodeal divided attention on late ERP components. Clin Neurophysiol 78:447–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand and perception of the target displacement. Nature 320:748–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artefact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:468–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gréa H, Pisella L, Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Tilikete C, Grafton S et al (2002) A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements. Neuropsychologia 40:2471–2480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Liegeois C, Chauvel P, Musolino A (1995) Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:191–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Held R, Gottlieb N (1958) Technique for studying adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination. Percept Mot Skills 8:83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd CB, Coles MGH (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 109:679–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd CB, Krigolson OE (2007) Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. Psychophysiology 44:913–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Nystrom L, Mars R, Coles MGH et al (2004) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals. Nat Neurosci 7:497–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd CB, Yeung N, Coles MGH, Cohen JD (2005) A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:163–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. Clarendon Press, Alderely

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss I, Dashieff RM, Lordeon P (1989) A parieto-occipital generator for P300: evidence from human intracranial recordings. Int J Neurosci 49:133–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krigolson OE, Heath M (2006) A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision. Exp Brain Res 169:473–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krigolson OE, Holroyd CB (2006) Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain. Neurosci 137:13–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krigolson OE, Holroyd CB (2007a) Hierarchical error processing: different errors, different systems. Brain Res 1155:70–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krigolson OE, Holroyd CB (2007b) Predictive information and motor control: The role of medial-frontal cortex. Psychophysiology 44:586–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Reckess GZ, Imamizu H (2001) The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements. Nat Neurosci 4(6):638–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH (1997) Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a generic neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 9(6):788–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005a) Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull 131:510–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis S, Gilzenrat MS, Holmes BD, Cohen JD (2005b) The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: a neurocomputational theory. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:291–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis S, Slagter HA, von Geusau NJA, Heslenfeld D, Holroyd CB (2005c) Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes. Eur J Neurosci 21:3161–3168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1996) Fast and slow feedback loops for the visual correction of spatial errors in a pointing task: a re-appraisal. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74:401–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pisella L, Gréa H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2000) An “automatic pilot” for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3:729–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer KM, Dien J, Donchin E (2001) Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology 38(2):343–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Matelli M (2003) Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 153:146–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Fornells A, Kurzbuch AR, Münte TF (2002) Time course of error detection and correction in humans: neurophysiological evidence. J Neurosci 22:9990–9996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trillenberg P, Sprenger A, Petersen D, Kömpf D, Heide W, Helmchen C (2007) Functional dissociation of saccade and hand reaching control with bilateral lesions of the medial wall of the intraparietal sulcus: implications for optic ataxia. NeuroImage 36:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher M, Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D, Rajkowski J, Aston-Jones G (1999) The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. Science 283(5401):549–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3:1212–1217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu AJ, Dayan P (2005) Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron 46:681–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for supporting this research. The first author would also like to thank Kelcey Erlandson for her help with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olav E. Krigolson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Participant seated at the experimental apparatus(TIF 466 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krigolson, O.E., Holroyd, C.B., Van Gyn, G. et al. Electroencephalographic correlates of target and outcome errors. Exp Brain Res 190, 401–411 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1482-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1482-x

Keywords

Navigation