Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force production

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested a hypothesis that force production by multi-finger groups leads to lower indices of force variability as compared to similar single-finger tasks. Three experiments were performed with quick force production, steady-state force production under visual feedback, and steady-state force production without visual feedback. In all experiments, a range of force levels was used computed as percentages of the maximal voluntary contraction force for each involved finger combination. Force standard deviation increased linearly with force magnitude across all three experiments and all finger combinations. There were modest differences between multi-finger and single-finger tasks in the indices of force variability, significant only in the tasks with steady-state force production under visual feedback. When fingers acted in groups, each finger showed significantly higher force variability as compared to its single-finger task and as compared to the multi-finger group as a whole. Fingers that were not instructed to produce force also showed close to linear relations between force standard deviation and force magnitude. For these fingers, indices of force variability were much higher as compared to those computed for the forces produced by instructed fingers. We interpret the findings within a feed-forward scheme of multi-finger control with two inputs only one of which is related to the explicit task. The total force variability reflects variability in only the task-related component, while variability of the finger forces is also due to variability of the component that is not related to the task. The findings tentatively suggest that total force variability originates at an upper level of the control hierarchy in accordance to the Weber–Fechner law rather than reflects a “neural noise” at the segmental level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton LG, Kim KH, Liu YT, Newell KM (1993) Impulse variability in isometric tasks. J Mot Behav 25:33–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA, Grossman M, Carlton LG (2002) Modeling variability of force during isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris. J Mot Behav 34:67–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA, Zelent M, Carlton LG (2003) Force control is greater in the upper compared with the lower extremity. J Mot Behav 35:322–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danion F, Schöner G, Latash ML, Li S, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) A force mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force production tasks. Biol Cybern 88:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) Positional frames of reference in motor control: their origin and use. Behav Brain Sci 18:723–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Goussev V, Sangole A, Levin MF (2007) Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Prog Brain Res 165:267–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1966) On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (eds) Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems, pp 9–26, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian, a translation is available in 1971 edition by MIT Press: Cambridge MA)

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houhgton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SR, Latash ML (2006) Feedforward control of a redundant motor system. Biol Cybern 95:271–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SR, Shim JK, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) Motor variability within a multi-effector system: Experimental and analytical studies of multi-finger production of quick force pulses. Exp Brain Res 163:75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak S, Duarte M, Latash ML (2008) Do synergies improve accuracy? A study of speed-accuracy trade-offs during finger force production. Motor Control 12:151–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak S, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2007) Hierarchies of synergies: an example of the two-hand, multi-finger tasks. Exp Brain Res 179:167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO, Hsiao SS, Yoshioka T (2002) Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics. Neuroscientist 8:111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KE, Hamilton AF, Wolpert DM (2002) Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol 88:1533–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW, Shim JK, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) Finger interdependence: Linking the kinetic and kinematic variables. Hum Move Sci (in press)

  • Kunimoto C, Miller J, Pashler H (2001) Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Conscious Cogn 10:294–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2008) Synergy. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2001) Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multi-finger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 141:153–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2002a) Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 146:412–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. (2002b) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control 11:275–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Shim JK, Smilga AV, Zatsiorsky VM (2005) A central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: a physical metaphor and a neural model. Biol Cybern 92:186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZM, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (1998) Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Exp Brain Res 119:276–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin V, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2004) Theory of the uncontrolled manifold: variance, self-motion, and neuronal noise. Program No. 871.17. Abstract Viewer and Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience

  • Moritz CT, Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM (2005a) Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 93:2449–2459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz CT, Christou EA, Meyer FG, Enoka RM (2005b) Coherence at 16–32 Hz can be caused by short-term synchrony of motor units. J Neurophysiol 94:105–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Carlton LG (1993) Force variability in isometric responses. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percep Perform 14:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsuki T (1981) Inhibition of individual fingers during grip strength exertion. Ergonomics 24:21–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olafsdottir H, Yoshida N, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) Anticipatory covariation of finger forces during self-paced and reaction time force production. Neurosci Lett 381:92–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilon J-F, De Serres SJ, Feldman AG (2007) Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force. Exp Brain Res 181:49–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schöner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK, Olafsdottir H, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) The emergence and disappearance of multi-digit synergies during force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 164:260–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slifkin AB, Newell KM (1999) Noise, information transmission, and force variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:837–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2000) Variability and noise in continuous force production. J Mot Behav 32:141–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Jordan K, Newell KM (2005) Information and force level interact in regulating force output during two and three digit grip configurations. Exp Brain Res 167:76–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey MT (2007) Action and perception at the level of synergies. Hum Mov Sci 26:657–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2002) Inter-digit individuation and force variability in the precision grip of young, elderly, and Parkinson’s disease participants. Motor Control 6:113–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (1998) Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: Finger interaction and neural network modeling. Biol Cybern 79:139–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (2000) Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 131:187–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) What do synergies do? Effects of secondary constraints on multi-digit synergies in accurate force-production tasks. J Neurophysiol 99:500–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was in part supported by NIH grants AG-018751, NS-035032, and AR-048563. We are grateful to Wei Zhang, Thomas Robert, Alexander Terekhov, Jason Friedman, and consultants from the Department of Statistics at Penn State University for their help at different stages of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology, Rec. Hall-268N, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Elena Yu. Shapkova, Simon R. Goodman, Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky & Mark L. Latash

  2. Lesgaft State University of Physical Culture, 190121, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Alexandra L. Shapkova

Authors
  1. Elena Yu. Shapkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra L. Shapkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon R. Goodman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark L. Latash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Latash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapkova, E.Y., Shapkova, A.L., Goodman, S.R. et al. Do synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 188, 411–425 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1371-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1371-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation