Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perception action interaction: the oblique effect in the evolving trajectory of arm pointing movements

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In previous studies, we provided evidence for a directional distortion of the endpoints of movements to memorized target locations. This distortion was similar to a perceptual distortion in direction discrimination known as the oblique effect so we named it the “motor oblique effect”. In this report we analyzed the directional errors during the evolution of the movement trajectory in memory guided and visually guided pointing movements and compared them with directional errors in a perceptual experiment of arrow pointing. We observed that the motor oblique effect was present in the evolving trajectory of both memory and visually guided reaching movements. In memory guided pointing the motor oblique effect did not disappear during trajectory evolution while in visually guided pointing the motor oblique effect disappeared with decreasing distance from the target and was smaller in magnitude compared to the perceptual oblique effect and the memory motor oblique effect early on after movement initiation. The motor oblique effect in visually guided pointing increased when reaction time was small and disappeared with larger reaction times. The results are best explained using the hypothesis that a low level oblique effect is present for visually guided pointing movements and this effect is corrected by a mechanism that does not depend on visual feedback from the trajectory evolution and might even be completed during movement planning. A second cognitive oblique effect is added in the perceptual estimation of direction and affects the memory guided pointing movements. It is finally argued that the motor oblique effect can be a useful probe for the study of perception–action interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appelle S (1972) Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychol Bull 78:266–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bard C, Turrell Y, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Lamarre Y, Martin O (1999) Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations. Exp Brain Res 125:410–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A (1981) Segregation of cognitive and motor aspect of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 29:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey DP (2001) Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends Cognit Sci 5:109–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2:563–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modelling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cognit Sci 4:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyde RT, Milner AD (2002) Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all the time. Exp Brain Res 144:518–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychol Bull 27:342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Madalena J (1987) The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Q J Exp Psychol A 39:541–559

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Essock EA (1980) The oblique effect of stimulus identification considered with respect to two classes of oblique effects. Perception 9:37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franz VH (2001) Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 5:457–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaveau V, Desmurget M (2004) Do movement planning and control represent independent modules? Behav Brain Sci 27:35–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentaz E, Hatwell Y (1995) The haptic “oblique effect” in children’s and adults’ perception of orientation. Perception 24:631–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saeti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of actions. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S, Dixon P (2001) Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:560–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320:748–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Westwood DA (2004) An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:203–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourtzelidis P, Smyrnis N, Evdokimidis I, Balogh A (2001) Systematic errors of planar arm movements provide evidence for space categorization of multiple frames of reference. Exp Brain Res 139:59–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Goodale MA (2000) Grasping after a delay shifts size-scalling from absolute to relative metrics. J Cogn Neurosci 12:856–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krukowski AE, Stone LS (2005) Expansion of direction space around the cardinal axes revealed by smooth pursuit eye movements. Neuron 45:315–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner DA, Dyde RT (2003) Orientation and disorientation: illusory perception and the real world. In: Johnson-Frey SH (eds) Taking action cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts. Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London, England, pp 4–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smyrnis N, Gourtzelidis P, Evdokimidis I (2000) Systematic directional error in 2-D arm movements increases with increasing delay between visual target presentation and movement execution. Exp Brain Res 131:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smyrnis N, Mantas A, Evdokimidis I (2007) The “motor oblique effect”: perceptual direction discrimination and pointing to memorized visual targets share the same preference for cardinal orientations. J Neurophysiol 97:1068–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Donkelaar P (1999) Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Exp Brain Res 125:517–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Sonderen JF, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1988) Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 71:320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the “Kapodistrias 2004-2005” program for research support from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cognition and Action Group, Neurology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece

    Asimakis Mantas, Ioannis Evdokimidis & Nikolaos Smyrnis

  2. Psychiatry Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 72 Vas. Sofias Ave., Athens, 11528, Greece

    Nikolaos Smyrnis

Authors
  1. Asimakis Mantas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ioannis Evdokimidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nikolaos Smyrnis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos Smyrnis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mantas, A., Evdokimidis, I. & Smyrnis, N. Perception action interaction: the oblique effect in the evolving trajectory of arm pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 184, 605–616 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1255-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1255-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation