Abstract
Human vision allows us both to perceive our surroundings (e.g., identify a cup) and to interact with them (e.g., reach for a cup). It is generally accepted that these functions are supported by a ventral system for conscious object identification and a dorsal system for unconscious control of action, but little research has addressed the extent to which these two systems can operate concurrently. We show that the identification of one object interferes with the planning of a pointing action to a second object, but does not interfere with the visually guided control required to complete the action. This lack of interference holds even for actions that must be modified in response to a dynamically changing scene. These findings support the proposal that the planning of action shares resources with conscious tasks of perception, but that the online control of already-initiated actions does not.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arend I, Johnston S, Shapiro K (2006) Task-irrelevant motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink. Psychon Bull Rev 13:600–607
Boulinguez P, Nougier V, Velay JL (2001) Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. I: study of right-handers. Cortex 37:101–122
Brehaut JC, Enns JT, Di Lollo V (1999) Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink. Percept Psychophys 61:1436–1448
Brown RG, Jahanshahi M (1998) An unusual enhancement of motor performance during bimanual movement in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:813–816
Castiello U (1996) Grasping a fruit: selection for action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:582–603
Chua R, Enns JT (2004) What the hand can’t tell the eye: illusion of space constancy during accurate pointing. Exp Brain Res 162:109–114
Deubel H, Schneider WX, Paprotta I (1998) Selective dorsal and ventral processing. Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Vis Cogn 5:81–107
Diedrichsen J, Nambisan R, Kennerley SW, Ivry RB (2004) Independent on-line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching. Eur J Neurosci 19:1643–1652
Elliott D, Lee TD (1995) The role of target information on manual-aiming bias. Psychol Res 58:2–9
Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357
Fecteau JF, Chua R, Franks IM, Enns JT (2001) Visual awareness and the on-line modification of action. Can J Exp Psychol 55:104–110
Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bülthoff HH, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11:20–25
Goodale MA, Milner AD (2004) Plans for action. Behav Brain Sci 27:37–40
Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–78
Henry FM, Rogers DE (1960) Increased response latency for complicated movements and a ‘memory drum’ theory of neuromotor action. Res Q 31:448–458
Liu G, Healey CG, Enns JT (2003) Target detection and localization in visual search: a dual systems perspective. Percept Psychophys 65:678–694
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, London
Norman J (2002) Two visual systems and two theories of perception: an attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behav Brain Sci 25:73–144
Pashler HE (1998) The psychology of attention. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pélisson D, Prablanc C, Goodale MA, Jeannerod M (1986) Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb II: evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Exp Brain Res 62:303–311
Schneider WX (1995) VAM: a neurocognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Vis Cogn 2:331–375
Shapiro K (2001) The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. Oxford University Press, London
Shapiro KL, Arnell KM, Raymond JE (1997) The attentional blink. Trends Cogn Sci 1:291–296
Westwood DA Goodale MA (2003) Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spat Vis 16:243–254
Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3(3 suppl 13):1–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by MSHRF and CIHR Graduate Fellowships to G Liu and an NSERC Discovery Grant to JT Enns.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, G., Chua, R. & Enns, J.T. Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control. Exp Brain Res 185, 709–717 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1196-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1196-5