Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the initial impulse associated with goal-directed aiming movements typically brings the limb to a position short of the target. This is because target overshooting is associated with greater temporal and energy costs than target undershooting. Presumably these costs can be expected to vary not only with the muscular forces required to move the limb, but also the gravitational forces inherent in the aiming task. In this study we examined the degree to which primary movement endpoint distributions depend on the direction of the movement with respect to gravity. We hypothesized that the magnitude of an undershoot bias would be greatest for downward movements because target overshooting necessitates a time and energy consuming movement reversal against gravity. Participants completed rapid aiming movements toward targets located above and below, as well as proximal and distal to a central home position. Movements were made both with and without additional mass attached to the limb. Although movement time did not vary with experimental condition, primary movement endpoint distributions were consistent with our predictions. Specifically, both greater undershooting and greater endpoint variability was associated with downward aiming movements. As well, a greater proportion of the overall movement time was spent in the corrective phase of the movement. These results are consistent with models of energy minimization that posit an inherent efficiency of control and hold that movements are organized to minimize movement time and energy expenditure and maximize mechanical advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beggs WDA, Howarth CI (1972) The accuracy of aiming at a target: some further evidence for a theory of intermittent control. Acta Psychol 36:171–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton LG (1981a) Processing visual feedback information for movement control. J Exp Psychol Human 7:1019–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton LG (1981b) Visual information: the control of aiming movements. Q J Exp Psychol A 33:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua R, Elliott D (1993) Visual regulation of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 12:365–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychol Bull 3:342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Hansen S, Mendoza J, Tremblay L (2004) Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: a framework for understanding speed–accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming. J Motor Behav 36:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht SE, Berthier NE, O’Sullivan LP (2003) The undershooting bias: learning to act optimally under uncertainty. Psychol Sci 14:257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JE (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95(3):340–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliviera FT, Elliott D, Goodman D (2005) Energy-minimization bias: Compensating for intrinsic influence of energy-minimization mechanisms. Motor Control 9:101–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, McGown C (1980) Terminal accuracy of unexpectedly loaded rapid movements: evidence for a mass-spring mechanism in programming. J Motor Behav 12:149–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT Jr (1979) Motor output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, McGown C, Quinn JT, Hawkins B (1986) Unexpected inertial loading in rapid reversal movements: violations of equifinality. Hum Mov Sci 5:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow WA, Newell KM (1998) Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy. Psychon B Rev 5:173–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3(monograph Suppl):1–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Worringham CJ (1991) Variability effects on the internal structure of rapid aiming movements. J Motor Behav 23:75–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chair Program funded this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Lyons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyons, J., Hansen, S., Hurding, S. et al. Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications. Exp Brain Res 174, 95–100 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0426-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0426-6

Keywords

Navigation