Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most research on the perception of emotional expressions is conducted using static faces as stimuli. However, facial displays of emotion are a highly dynamic phenomenon and a static photograph is its very unnatural representation. The goal of the present research was to assess the role of stimuli dynamics as well as subjects’ sex in the perception of emotional expressions. In the experiment, subjects rated the intensity of expressions of anger and happiness presented as photographs (static stimuli) and animations (dynamic stimuli). The impact of both stimulus dynamics and emotion type on the perceived intensity was observed. The emotions on ‘angry faces’ were judged as more intense than on ‘happy faces’ and the intensity ratings were higher in the case of animation rather than photography. Moreover, gender differences in the rated intensity were found. For male subjects higher intensity ratings for dynamic than for static expressions were noted in the case of anger, whereas in the case of happiness, no differences were observed. For female subjects, however, differences for both anger and happiness were significant. The results suggest that the dynamic characteristic of facial display is an important factor in the perception of the intensity of emotional expressions. Its effect, however, depends on the subjects’ sex and emotional valence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad A, Smith PK (1994) Bullying in schools and the issue of sex differences. In: Archer J (ed) Male violence. Routledge, London, pp 70–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambadar Z, Schooler JW, Cohn JF (2005) Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psych Sci 16:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaupré MG, Hess U (2005) Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. J Cross-Cult Psych 36(3):355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassili J (1979) Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. J Pers Soc Psych 37:2049–2058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biaggio MK (1980) Assessment of anger arousal. J Pers Assess 44:289–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis CJ, Chazan E, Ting CZ (1993) Preschool children’s decoding of facial emotions. J Gen Psych 154:375–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne VJ (2005) Lateralised processing of positive facial emotion: sex differences in strength of hemispheric dominance. Neuropsychologia 43:953–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM (1999) Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron RF, Caron AJ, Myers RS (1985) Do infants see emotional expressions in static faces? Child Dev 56:1552–1560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly M, Wilson M (1988) Homicide. Aldine, Hawthorne, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher HL, Happé F, Brunswick N, Fletcher PC, Frith U, Frith CD (2000) Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38:11–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw GM, Bulman-Fleming MB, Ngo C (2004) A signal detection analysis of sex differences in the perception of emotional faces. Brain Cogn 54:248–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JA (1978) Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psych Bull 85:845–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JA (1984) Nonverbal sex differences: communication accuracy and expressive style. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood NK, Hall LJ, Shinkfield AJ (1999) Recognition of facial emotional expressions from moving and static displays by individuals with mental retardation. Am J Ment Retarded 104(3):270–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hortsmann G (2003) What do facial expressions convey: feeling states, behavioral intentions, or action requests? Emotion 3(2):150–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamachi M, Bruce B, Mukaida S, Gyoba J, Yoshikawa S, Akamatsu S (2001) Dynamic properties influence the perception of facial expressions. Perception 30:875–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Killgore WD (2000) Sex differences in identifying the facial affect of normal and mirror reversed faces. Perc Mot Skills 91:525–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Killgore WD, Gangestad SW (1999) Sex differences in assymetrically perceiving the intensity of facial expressions. Perc Mot Skills 91:311–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killgore WD, Oki M, Yurgelun-Todd DA (2001) Sex-specific developmental changes in amygdala responses to affective faces. Brain Imaging 12:427–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilts CD, Egan G, Gideon DA, Ely TD, Hoffman JM (2003) Dissociable neural pathways are involved in the recognition of emotion in static and dynamic facial expressions. NeuroImage 18:156–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirouac G, Dore FY (1985) Accuracy of the judgement of facial expression of emotions as a function of sex and level of education. J Nonverbal Behav 9:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal MK, Palchoudhury S (1985) Perceptual skill in decoding facial affect. Perc Mot Skills 60:96–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A (1981) Silent messages: implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki SJR, Hartigan M (1988) Accuracy of facial affect recognition as a function of locus of control orientation and anticipated interpersonal interaction. J Soc Psych 128:363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Puce A, Truett A, Bentin S, Gore JC, McCarthy G (1998) Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J Neurosci 18:2188–2199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (1992) Neuropsychological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Philos Trans R Soc 335:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter NG, Rotter GS (1988) Sex differences in encoding and decoding of negative facial emotion. J Nonverbal Behav 12:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato W, Kochiyama T, Yoshikawa S, Naito E, Matsamura M (2004) Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expression of emotion: an fMRI study. Cog Brain Res 20:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato W, Yoshikawa S (2004) The dynamic aspects of emotional facial expressions. Cogn Emot 18:710–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KL, Cohn JF (2000) Human facial expressions as adaptations: evolutionary questions in facial expression research. Yearbook Phys Anthrop 44:3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer JF, Johnsen BH (2000) Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: a multivariate analysis of recognition errors. Scand J Psych 41:243–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HL, MacDonald CJ, Manstead AS (1986) Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions. J Pers Soc Psych 50:737–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrle T, Kaiser S, Schmidt S, Scherer KR (2000) Studying the dynamics of emotional expression using synthesized facial muscle movements. J Pers Soc Psych 78(1):105–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant number KBN 3 PO5A 043 2 from Polish State Comitee for Scientific Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cezary Biele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biele, C., Grabowska, A. Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions. Exp Brain Res 171, 1–6 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0254-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0254-0

Keywords

Navigation