Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To what extent does visual feedback shape the coordination between our arms? As a first step towards answering this question, this study compares bimanual coupling in simultaneous bimanual reversal movements that control cursor movements on a vertical screen. While both cursors were visible in the control condition, visual feedback was prevented in the experimental condition by deleting one or both cursors from the screen. Absence of visual feedback for one or both arms significantly increased the reaction times of both arms and the movement amplitude of the occluded arm. Temporal coupling between the arms remained unchanged in all feedback conditions. The same was true for spatial coupling of movement directions. Amplitude coupling, however, was significantly affected by visual feedback. When no feedback for either arm was available, amplitude correlations were significantly higher than when feedback for one or both arms was present. This finding suggests that online visual feedback decreases bimanual amplitude coupling, presumably through independent movement corrections for the two arms. The difference between movement amplitudes and movement directions in their susceptibility to visual feedback supports the idea that they are subserved by different control mechanisms. Analysis of eye movements during task performance revealed no major differences between the different feedback conditions. The eye movements of all subjects followed a stereotypical pattern, with generally only one saccade after target onset, directed towards the average position of all possible targets, irrespective of feedback condition and target direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock O, Arnold K (1992) Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets. Exp Brain Res 90:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boessenkool JJ, Nijhof E-J, Erkelens CJ (1999) Variability and correlations in bi-manual pointing movements. Hum Movement Sci 18:525–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaerts H, Buekers MJ, Zaal FT, Swinnen SP (2003) When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: the effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination. Behav Brain Res 138:45–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnard M, Pailhous J (1999) Contribution of proprioceptive information to preferred versus constrained space-time behavior in rhythmical movements. Exp Brain Res 128:568–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat RB, Sanes JN (1998) Cognitive channels computing action distance and direction. J Neurosci 18:7566–7580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan N, Shadmehr R (1999) Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern 81:39–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byblow WD, Chua R, Bysouth-Young DF, Summers JJ (1999) Stabilization of bimanual coordination through visual coupling. Hum Movement Sci 18:281–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordo P, Bevan L, Gurfinkel V, Carlton L, Carlton M, Kerr G (1995) Proprioceptive coordination of discrete movement sequences: mechanism and generality. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:305–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M, Gordon J, Hening W, Ghez C (1990) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VII. Independent setting of amplitude and direction in response preparation. Exp Brain Res 79:530–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler B, Duck T, Mosher M, Mathieson B (1991) The coordination of bimanual aiming movements: evidence for progressive desynchronization. Q J Exp Psychol 43:205–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franz EA, Eliassen JC, Ivry RB, Gazzaniga MS (1996) Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients. Psychol Sci 7:306–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribova A, Donchin O, Bergman H, Vaadia E, Cardoso de Oliveira S (2002) Timing of bimanual movements in human and non-human primates in relation to neuronal activity in primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area. Exp Brain Res 146:322–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Sainburg R (1995) Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:273–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, Spijkers W, Steglich W (2001) Static and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal movements. J Motor Behav 33:67–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honda H (1982) Rightward superiority of eye movements in a bimanual aiming task. Q J Exp Psychol 34A: 499–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Kritikos A (1999) Attention for action: Coordinating bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. Brit J Psychol 90:247–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Husain M, Harvey M, Kramer T, Dow L (2000) The coordination of bimanual prehension movements in a centrally deafferented patient. Brain 123:380–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Newport R, Harvey M (2002) Co-ordination of bimanual movements in a centrally deafferented patient executing open loop reach-to-grasp movements. Acta Psychol 110:231–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazennikov S, Wicki U, Corboz M, Hyland B, Palmeri A, Rouiller EM, Wiesendanger M (1994) Temporal structure of a bimanual goal-directed movement sequence in monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 6:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979a) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol 5:229–238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979b) On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science 203:1029–1031

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Baba DM (1984) Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Q J Exp Psychol 36A:335–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müri RM, Kaluzny P, Nirkko A, Frosch M (1999) Eye-hand coordination in uni- and bimanual goal-oriented tasks. Exp Brain Res 128:200–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1996) Fast and slow feedback loops for the visual correction of spatial errors in pointing task: a reappraisal. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74:401–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrig S, Kazennikov O, Wiesendanger M (1999) Time structure of a goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraints. Behav Brain Res 103:95–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C (1993) Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 70:2136–2147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth BR, Shimojo S (2002) How the lack of visuomotor feedback affects even the early stages of goal-directed pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 143:181–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simoneau M, Paillard J, Bard C, Teasdale N, Martin O, Fleury M, Lamarre Y (1999) Role of the feedforward command and reafferent information in the coordination of a passing prehension task. Exp Brain Res 128:236–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summers J (2002) Practice and training in bimanual tasks: Strategies and constraints. Brain Cognition 48:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP, Jardin K, Meulenbroek R (1996) Between limb asynchronies during bimanual coordination: effects of manual dominance and attentional cueing. Neuropsychologia 34:1203–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verschueren SMP, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ, Dounskaia NV (1999) Proprioceptive control of multijoint movements: bimanual circle drawing. Exp Brain Res.127:182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt C, Cardoso de Oliveira S (2003) Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Exp Brain Res 148:439–450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart LR, Lee TD, Cunningham SJ, Murdoch JE (2002) Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychol 110:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the DFG (CA 245), the German-Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP) funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), and the Volkswagen Foundation. We are grateful to Fabian Ottjes for programming the experimental software and to Anja Ruether for performing the experiments.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Simone Cardoso de Oliveira

    Present address: Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany

  2. Sébastien Barthélémy

    Present address: UFR STAPS de Grenoble, 1741 rue de la piscine, Domaine universitaire, 38400, Saint Martin d’Hères, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universität Dortmund, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany

    Simone Cardoso de Oliveira & Sébastien Barthélémy

Authors
  1. Simone Cardoso de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sébastien Barthélémy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Cardoso de Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardoso de Oliveira, S., Barthélémy, S. Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions. Exp Brain Res 162, 78–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2107-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2107-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation