Skip to main content
Log in

Surface segregation driven by orientation-defined junctions

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This study was designed to ascertain whether the human visual system can segregate overlapped surfaces by integrating texture borders at second-order X-junctions. The stimuli used were crossed vertical and horizontal stripes consisting of Gabor micro-patterns. We manipulated the orientation of the center region of each stripe. Observers judged whether the crossed stripes appeared as “two overlapped stripes” or “five individual regions.” The results showed that the probability of perceiving overlapped stripes exceeded the chance level (0.5) when the orientation differences between the center and flanking regions were less than 30°. We suggest that the integration of texture borders along each stripe occurs by the filter-rectify-filter mechanism, resulting in the impression of overlapped surfaces. When this fails, the outcome is the perception of five individual regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 a
Fig. 2 a
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson EH (1993) Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness. Science 262:2042–2044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahissar M, Hochstein S (1995) How early is early vision? Evidence from perceptual learning. In: Papathomas TV, Chubb C, Gorea A, Kowler E (eds) Early vision and beyond. MIT Press, MA, pp 199–206

  • Arsenault AS, Wilkinson F, Kingdom FAA (1999) Modulation frequency and orientation tuning of second-order texture mechanisms. J Opt Soc Am A 16:427–435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck J (1966) Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping. Percept Psychophys 1:300–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen JR (1991) Theories of visual texture perception. In: Regan D (ed) Vision and visual dysfunction, vol 10, Spatial vision. Macmillan, New York, pp 114–134

  • Bergen JR, Adelson EH (1988) Early vision and texture perception. Nature 333:363–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF (1993) Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local association field. Vision Res 33:173–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorea A, Papathomas TV (1993) Double opponency as a generalized concept in texture segregation illustrated with stimuli defined by color, luminance, and orientation. J Opt Soc Am A 10:1450–1462

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabe T, Miura K (2004) Configuration effects on texture transparency. Spatial Vis 17:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdom FAA, Keeble DRT (2000) Luminance spatial frequency differences facilitate the segmentation of superimposed textures. Vision Res 40:1077–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdom FAA, Prins N, Hayes A (2003) Mechanism independence for texture-modulation detection is consistent with a filter-rectify-filter mechanism. Vis Neurosci 20:65–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landy MS, Bergen JR (1991) Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Res 31:679–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langley K, Fleet DJ, Hibbard PB (1996) Linear filtering precedes nonlinear processing in early vision. Curr Biol 6:891–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mareschal I, Baker CL Jr (1998) A cortical locus for the processing of contrast-defined contours. Nature Neurosci 1:150–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsudo H (2003) Information regarding structure and lightness based on phenomenal transparency influences the efficiency of visual search. Perception 32:53–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motoyoshi I, Nishida S (2001) Visual response saturation to orientation contrast in the perception of texture boundary. J Opt Soc Am A 18:2209–2219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motoyoshi I, Nishida S (2002) Spatiotemporal interactions in detection of texture orientation modulations. Vision Res 42:2829–2841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prins N, Kingdom FAA (2002) Orientation- and frequency- modulated at low depth of modulation are processed by off-orientation and off-frequency texture mechanisms. Vision Res 42:705–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prins N, Kingdom FAA (2003) Detection and discrimination of texture modulations defined by orientation, spatial frequency, and contrast. J Opt Soc Am A 20:401–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter A, Sperling G, Chubb C (1995) Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms. Vision Res 35:915–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Tonder GJ, Ejima Y (2000) From image segmentation to anti-textons. Perception 29:1231–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Cavanagh P (1996) Texture laciness: the texture equivalent of transparency? Perception 25:293–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenderoth P, Clifford CW, Wyatt AM (2001) Hierarchy of spatial interactions in the processing of contrast-defined contours. J Opt Soc Am A 18:2190–2196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson SS, Landy MS (1998) Examining edge- and region-based texture analysis mechanisms. Vision Res 38:439–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

We thank the anonymous reviewer for helpful and constructive criticisms of previous versions of the manuscript. We also thank Muhammad Kamal Uddin for correcting the English language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Kawabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawabe, T., Miura, K. Surface segregation driven by orientation-defined junctions. Exp Brain Res 158, 391–395 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2065-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2065-0

Keywords

Navigation