Skip to main content
Log in

Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previously, professional violin players were found to automatically discriminate tiny pitch changes, not discriminable by nonmusicians. The present study addressed the pitch processing accuracy in musicians with expertise in playing a wide selection of instruments (e.g., piano; wind and string instruments). Of specific interest was whether also musicians with such divergent backgrounds have facilitated accuracy in automatic and/or attentive levels of auditory processing. Thirteen professional musicians and 13 nonmusicians were presented with frequent standard sounds and rare deviant sounds (0.8, 2, or 4% higher in frequency). Auditory event-related potentials evoked by these sounds were recorded while first the subjects read a self-chosen book and second they indicated behaviorally the detection of sounds with deviant frequency. Musicians detected the pitch changes faster and more accurately than nonmusicians. The N2b and P3 responses recorded during attentive listening had larger amplitude in musicians than in nonmusicians. Interestingly, the superiority in pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians over nonmusicians was observed not only with the 0.8% but also with the 2% frequency changes. Moreover, also nonmusicians detected quite reliably the smallest pitch changes of 0.8%. However, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a recorded during a reading condition did not differentiate musicians and nonmusicians. These results suggest that musical expertise may exert its effects merely at attentive levels of processing and not necessarily already at the preattentive levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alho K, Woods DL, Algazi A, Näätänen R (1992) Intermodal selective attention II: effects of attentional load on processing auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:356–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amenedo E, Escera C (2000) The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception. Eur J Neurosci 12:2570–2574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Electroencephalographic Society (1991) American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 8:200–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berti S, Schröger E (2001) Involuntary attention switch with different levels of distractor strenght. In: Sommerfeld E, Kompass R, Lachmann T (eds) Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Pabst Science, Lengerich, Germany, pp 285–290

  • Besson M, Faïta F (1995) An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: comparison between musicians and non-musicians. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perfor 21:1278–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson M, Faïta F, Requin J (1994) Brain waves associated with musical incongruities differ for musicians and non-musicians. Neurosci Lett 168:101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brattico E, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2001) Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and non-musicians: evidence from ERP recordings. Music Percept 19:199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crummer GC, Walton JP, Wayman JW, Hantz EC, Frisina RD (1994) Neural processing of musical timbre by musicians, nonmusicians, and musicians possessing absolute pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 95:2720–2727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I (2000) Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 5:151–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fastl H, Hesse A (1984) Frequency discrimination for pure tones at short durations. Acustica 56:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaernbach C (1991) Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Percept Psychophysiol 49:227–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koelsch S, Schröger E, Tervaniemi M (1999) Superior attentive and pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. Neuroreport 10:1309–1313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala T, Alho K, Näätänen R (2000) Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions. Trends Neurosci 23:115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Münte TF, Altenmüller E, Jäncke L (2002) The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Neurosci Rev 3:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  • Näätänen R, Simpson M, Loveless NE (1982) Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol Psychol 14:53–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen R, Schröger E, Karakas S, Tervaniemi M, Paavilainen P (1993) Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. Neuroreport 4:503–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M, Sussman E, Paavilainen P, Winkler I (2001) ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci 24:283–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen R, Winkler I (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 6:826–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak G, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1992a) Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgements. Psychophysiology 29:398–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novak G, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1992b). The chronometry of attention-modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection. Psychophysiology 29:412–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan HG, Wiznitzer ML (1990) Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:255–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pantev C, Engelien A, Candia V, Elbert T (2001) Representational cortex in musicians: plastic alterations in response to musical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:300–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pantev C, Oostenveld R, Engelien A, Ross B, Roberts LE, Hoke M (1998) Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 392:811–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pantev C, Roberts LE, Schulz M, Engelien A, Ross B (2001) Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. Neuroreport 12:169–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone A (2001) The brain that plays music and is changed by it. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:315–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschecker JP (1999) Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems. Trends Neurosci 22:74–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschecker JP (2001) Cortical plasticity and music. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:330–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter W, Paavilainen P, Lavikainen J, Reinikainen K, Alho K, Sams M, Näätänen R (1992) Event-related potentials to repetition and change to auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogra Clin Neurophysiol 83:306–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG, Friedman D (1979) A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science 203:1358–1361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sams M, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Näätänen R (1985) Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62:437–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaug G, Chen C (2001) The brain of musicians: a model for functional and structural adaptation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:281–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schröger E (1997) On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 34:245–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schröger E (1998) Measurement and interpretation of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN). Behav Res Methods, Instrum Comput 30:131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin A, Bosnyak DJ, Trainor LJ, Roberts LE (2003) Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J Neurosci 23:5545–5552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkkonen J, Tervaniemi M (2000) Towards optimal recording and analysis of the mismatch negativity. Audiol Neurootol 5:235–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tervaniemi M, Rytkönen M, Schröger E, Ilmoniemi RJ, Näätänen R (2001) Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians. Learn Mem 8:295–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tervaniemi M (2001) Musical sound processing: evidence from electric and magnetic recordings. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:259–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tervaniemi M, Ilvonen T, Sinkkonen J, Kujala A, Alho K, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R (2000a) Harmonic partials facilitate pitch discrimination in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neurosci Lett 279:29–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tervaniemi M, Schröger E, Saher M, Näätänen R (2000b) Effects of spectral complexity and sound duration in complex-sound pitch processing in humans—a mismatch negativity study. Neurosci Lett 290:66–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiitinen H, May P, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 372:90–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor LJ, Desjardings RN, Rockel C (1999) A comparison of contour and interval processing in musicians and nonmusicians using event-related potentials. Aust J Psychol 51:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zuijen TL, Sussman E, Winkler I, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2004) Pre-attentive grouping of sequential sounds—an event-related potential study comparing musicians and non-musicians. J Cogn Neurosci 16:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Marie Curie Individual fellowship by European Commission (M.T.; QLK6-CT-2000051227) and DFG (E.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Tervaniemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tervaniemi, M., Just, V., Koelsch, S. et al. Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study. Exp Brain Res 161, 1–10 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2044-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2044-5

Keywords

Navigation