Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis

  • Review
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complaints regarding, and morbidity of, osteoporosis are caused by fractures which are associated with pain and decrease of physical function, social function, and well-being. These are aspects of quality of life. Health-related quality of life covers physical, mental, and social well-being. Quality of life may be measured for evaluation of treatment effects in clinical trials, for the assessment of the burden of the disease of osteoporosis, and for estimates of the cost-effectiveness of different treatment scenarios in health care policy. Quality of life has been measured in patients with osteoporosis with generic questionnaires such as SF-36 and EQ-5D, which can be used in many diseases, or with one of the six available osteoporotic-specific questionnaires, e.g., Qualeffo-41 or OPAQ. Every questionnaire has to be validated to assess psychometric properties and discrimination power between patients with osteoporosis and control subjects. The value attached to specific health states (utility) can be assessed with some generic instruments or by systematic questioning of the patient, e.g., the time-trade-off method. This results in one value for health status ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Utility values can be used to calculate loss of quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Most data have been obtained in patients with prevalent vertebral fractures. Scores of specific and generic questionnaires showed significant loss of quality of life with prevalent vertebral fractures. In addition, studies with Qualeffo-41 and OPAQ showed a deteriorating quality of life with increasing number of vertebral fractures. Lumbar fractures had more impact on quality of life than thoracic fractures. Incident vertebral fractures were also associated with a decrease of quality of life especially in the physical function domain. This applied to clinical incident vertebral fractures as well as to subclinical fractures to a lesser degree. Loss of quality of life following hip fracture has been documented with generic and osteoporosis-specific questionnaires. A considerable loss was observed in the 1st year with some improvement in the 2nd year, but not to baseline values. Quality of life depended on comorbidity, mobility, activities of daily life (ADL)–independence, and fracture complaints. Utility loss has been observed following hip fracture, especially disabling hip fracture, hip and vertebral fracture combined, or multiple vertebral fractures. Utility following osteoporotic fractures has been valued by patients, the healthy elderly, and panels of experts. The healthy elderly gave the worse quality-of-life scores (lower utility) to various hip fractures than patients with hip fractures themselves. In conclusion, suitable instruments exist for measuring quality of life in patients with osteoporotic fractures. These instruments are useful for clinical trials and for assessment of the burden of disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO Scientific Group on the Burden of Musculoskeletal Conditions at the Start of the New Millenium (2003) The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millenium. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 919. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland

  2. Leidig G, Minne HW, Sauer P, Wüster C, Wüster J, Lojen M, Raue F, Ziegler R (1990) A study of complaints and their relation to vertebral destruction in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 8:217–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1994) Pain and disability associated with new vertebral fractures and other spinal conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 47:231–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanis JA, Minne WH, Meunier PJ, Ziegler R, Allender E (1992) Quality of life and vertebral osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2:161–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Liberman U, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I (1997) Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:36–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D (1992) Quality of life measures in health care, I: applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 305:1074–1077

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Fitzpatrick R, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D (1992) Quality of life measures in health care, II: design, analysis and interpretation. BMJ 305:1145–1148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cranney A, Coyle D, Welch V, Lee KM, Tugwell P (1999) A review of economic evaluation in osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res 12:425–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cranney A, Coyle D, Pham B, Tetroe J, Wells G, Jolly E, Tugwell P (2001) The psychometric properties of patient preferences in osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 28:132–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt S, McEwen J, McKenna SP (1985) Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 35:185–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS (1981) The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Health Institute, Boston

  14. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measures for primary care. BMJ 305:160–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kind P (1996) The EuroQoL instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 191–201

  16. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO (1983) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 22:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt GH, Mitchell A, Irving EJ, Singer J, Williams N, Goodacre R et al (1989) A new measure of health status for clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 96:804–810

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O et al (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (Qualeffo). Osteoporos Int 10:150–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Adachi JD, Clifton J, Griffith LE, Epstein RS et al (1993) Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 36:750–756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group (1997) Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:478–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Adachi JD, Epstein RS, Juniper EF et al (1999) Development and validation of the Mini-Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) in osteoporotic women with back pain due to vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Osteoporos Int 10:207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Helmes E, Hodsman A, Lazowski D, Bhardwaj A, Crilly R, Nichol P et al (1995) A questionnaire to evaluate disability in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures. Gerontol Med Sci 50A:M91–M98

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B, Love B, Kleerekoper M, Ross P, Martin A, Holmes R (1997) Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 12:456–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chandler JM, Martin AR, Girman C, Ross PD, Love-McClung B, Lydick E, Yawn BP (1998) Reliability of an osteoporosis targeted quality of life survey instrument for use in the community: OPTQoL. Osteoporos Int 8:127–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Randell AG, Bhalerao N, Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA, Silverman SL (1998) Quality of life in osteoporosis: reliability, consistency, and validity of the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire. J Rheumatol 25:1171–1179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murrell P, Todd CJ, Martin A, Walton J, Lips P, Reeve J and the Working Party for Quality of Life of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (2001) Postal administration compared with nurse-supported administration of the Qualeffo-41 in a population sample: comparison of results and assessment of psychometric properties. Osteoporos Int 12:672–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marquis R, Cialdella P, De La Loge C (2001) Development and validation of a specific quality of life module for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the Qualiost. Qual Life Res 10:555–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tosteson ANA (1997) Quality of life in the economic evaluation of osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Spine 22:58S–62S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F (eds) (2003) The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  30. Tosteson ANA, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, Moncur MM, Kneeland TS, Melton III LJ (2001) Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int 12:1042–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ, Moncur MM, Ettinger B, Tosteson ANA (1999) Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Making 19:141–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C, Kanis JA (2000) Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, Harper KD, Xie S, on behalf of the Health-Related Quality of Life Subgroup of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study (2001) Arthritis Rheum 44:2611–2619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pluijm SMF, Tromp AM, Smit JH, Deeg DJH, Lips P (2000) Consequences of vertebral deformities in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 15:1564–1572

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Oleksik A (2001) Vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Dissertation, VU Amsterdam

  38. Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK et al (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(2):113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dolan P, Torgerson D, Kumar Kakarlapudi T (1999) Health-related quality of life of Colles’ fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 9:196–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Miller CW (1978) Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg 60A:930–934

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cooper C (1997) The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med 103:12S–19S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Marottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM (1992) Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Ger Soc 40:861–866

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Willig R, Keinanen-Kiukaaniemi S, Jalovaara P (2001) Mortality and quality of life after trochanteric hip fracture. Public Health 115:323–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Norton R, Butler M, Robinson E, Lee-Joe T, Campbell AJ (2000) Declines in physical functioning attributable to hip fracture among older people: a follow-up study of case-control participants. Disabil Rehabil 22:345–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Randell AG, Nguyen TV, Bhalerao N, Silverman SL, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (2000) Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:460–466

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hall SE, Williams JA, Senior JA, Goldswain PR, Criddle RA (2000) Hip fracture outcomes: quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community. Aust N Z J Med 30:327–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tidermark J, Zethraeus N, Svensson O, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S (2002) Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: functional outcome and quality of life according to EuroQol. Qual Life Res 11:473–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tidermark J, Zethraeus N, Svensson O, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S (2002) Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 16:34–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Van Balen R, Steyerberg EW, Polder JJ, Ribbers TLM, Habbema JDF, Cools HJM (2001) Hip fracture in elderly patients: outcomes for function, quality of life and type of residence. Clin Orthoped Rel Res 390:232–243

    Google Scholar 

  50. Borgquist L, Nilsson LT, Lindelow G, Wiklund I, Thorngren KG (1992) Perceived health in hip-fracture patients: a prospective follow-up of 100 patients. Age Ageing 21:109–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cree M, Hayduk L, Soskolne CL, Suarez-Almazor M (2001) Modeling changes in health perception following hip fracture. Qual Life Res 10:651–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Berger C, Joseph L, Papaioannou A, Pickard L et al (2001) The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada. Osteoporos Int 12:903–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Salkeld G, Cameron ID, Cumming RG, Easter S, Seymour J, Kurrle SE, Quine S (2003) Quality of life related to fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a time trade off study. BMJ 320:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  54. National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8[Suppl 4]:S1–S88

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg (2002) Osteoporose: Tweede Herziene Richtlijn (in Dutch). Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Utrecht

Download references

Aknowledgements

Natasja van Schoor has been funded by an unrestricted grant of Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lips.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lips, P., van Schoor, N.M. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 16, 447–455 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7

Keywords

Navigation