Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Multichannel urodynamic testing is commonly used to diagnose urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). It has been claimed that USI may be diagnosed by imaging. In this study we determined the predictive value of ultrasound findings for USI.

Methods

This is an observational study utilising data obtained during urodynamic testing. Data sets were analysed in 209 patients in order to determine the predictive value of sonographic findings for the diagnosis of USI.

Results

Bladder neck descent and maximal urethral pressure were the only independent predictors of USI identified by multivariate logistic regression. The finding of a cystourethrocele with funnelling increased the odds of a diagnosis of USI by 2.5 (95 % confidence interval 1.17–5.4, p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Translabial ultrasound can identify an anatomical configuration that is associated with USI. However, sonographic findings are insufficient to predict USI and can not replace urodynamic testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lemack GE (2004) Urodynamic assessment of patients with stress incontinence: how effective are urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressures at case selection and predicting outcome? Curr Opin Urol 14(6):307–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang Y, Chen H (2007) Computer-aided diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence with vector-based perineal ultrasound using neural networks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(7):1002–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewicky-Gaupp C, Blaivas JG, Clark A, McGuire EJ, Schaer G, Tumbarello J, Tunn R, DeLancey J (2009) “The cough game”: are there characteristic urethrovesical movement patterns associated with stress incontinence? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(2):171–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz HP (2011) Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J 22(9):1085–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz HP (2011) Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J 22:1221–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shek KL, Dietz HP (2008) The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48:337–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Green TH (1975) Urinary stress incontinence: differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122(3):368–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 (6):1467–1470; discussion 1470–1471; comment in Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 177:248

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz HP, Shek KL (2008) Validity and reproducibility of the digital detection of levator trauma. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1097–1101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenberg V, Chantarasorn V, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Does levator ani injury affect cystocele type? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:618–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chantarasorn V, Dietz H (2012) Diagnosis of cystocele type by clinical examination and pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39(6):710–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holtedahl K, Verelst M, Schiefloe A, Hunskaar S (2000) Usefulness of urodynamic examination in female urinary incontinence—lessons from a population-based, randomized, controlled study of conservative treatment. Scand J Urol Nephrol 34:169–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lose G, Thyssen H (1996) Reproducibility of cystometry and pressure-flow parameters in female patients. Neurourol Urodyn 15:302–303

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weidner A, Myers ER, Evan R, Visco A, Cundiff G, Bump R (2001) Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:20–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodgkinson CP (1953) Relationships of the female urethra and bladder in urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 65:560–573

    Google Scholar 

  17. Green TH Jr (1978) Static cystourethrograms in stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 132(2):228–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drutz HP, Shapiro BJ, Mandel F (1978) Do static cystourethrograms have a role in the investigation of female incontinence? Am J Obstet Gynecol 130(5):516–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietz H, Wilson P (2004) The ‘iris effect’: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us understand anti-incontinence procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:267–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz HP, Beer-Gabel M (2012) Ultrasound in the investigation of posterior compartment vaginal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40:14–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lose G (1997) Urethral pressure measurement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 166:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dietz HP, Clarke B (2001) The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(1):38–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pirpiris A, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:507–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz H, Bond V, Shek K (2011) Does childbirth alter the reflex pelvic floor response to sudden increases in intra-abdominal pressure? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1002/uog.10083

  25. Dietz HP, Wilson PD (1999) The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10(1):3–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Prof. H.P. Dietz has received honoraria as a speaker from GE, Astellas and AMS and has in the past acted as consultant for CCS, AMS and Materna. He has also received equipment loans from GE, Toshiba and Bruel and Kjaer. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. P. Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, H.P., Nazemian, K., Shek, K.L. et al. Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound?. Int Urogynecol J 24, 1399–1403 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2032-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2032-4

Keywords

Navigation