Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chinese validation of Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

UDI-6 and IIQ-7 are useful disease-specific questionnaires evaluating the impact of urinary incontinence on the QOL of women. We aim at validating them in Chinese language.

Methods

Both instruments were translated; 207 urinary incontinent women completed UDI-6 and IIQ-7, SF-36, bladder diary and urodynamic evaluation. The reliability and validity were assessed.

Results

There were high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha for UDI-6 and IIQ-7 was 0.80 and 0.93) and test–retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.72 and 0.75, P < 0.001). Scoring of UDI-6 and IIQ-7 was negatively correlated with SF-36 (P < 0.001); positively correlated with daytime urinary frequency and incontinent episodes (P < 0.001), and women's VAS (P < 0.001). Subscales of UDI-6 and IIQ-7 could discriminate women with different urodynamic diagnoses.

Conclusions

The Chinese UDI-6 and IIQ-7 is reliable and valid. Study on the responsiveness to treatment is in progress. They are useful in assessing impact of the urinary incontinence in Chinese women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brieger GM, Mongelli M, Hin LY, Chung TKH (1997) The epidemiology of urinary dysfunction in Chinese women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8:191–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Correia S, Dinis P, Rolo F, Lunet N (2009) Prevalence, treatment and known risk factors of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the non-institutionalized Portuguese population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1481–1489

    Google Scholar 

  3. Onur R, Deveci SE, Rahman S, Sevindik F, Acik Y (2009) Prevalence and risk factors of female urinary incontinence in eastern Turkey. Int J Urology 16:566–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lasserre A, Pelat C, Gueroult V, Hanslik T, Chartier-Kastler E, Blanchon T et al (2009) Urinary incontinence in French women: prevalence, risk factors, and impact on quality of life. Eur Urol 56:177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu L, Lang J, Liu C, Han S, Huang J, Li X (2009) The epidemiological study of women with urinary incontinence and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence in China. Menopause 16:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brieger GM, Yip SK, Hin LY, Chung TKH (1996) The prevalence of urinary dysfunction in Hong Kong Chinese women. Obstet Gynecol 88:1041–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yip SK, Chan A, Pang S, Leung P, Tang C, Shek D et al (2003) The impact of urodynamic stress incontinence and detrusor overactivity on marital relationship and sexual function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1244–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu HJ, Wong WY, Chen J, Chie WC (2003) Quality of life impact and treatment seeking of Chinese women with urinary incontinence. Qual Life Res 12:327–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelleher CJ (1997) Quality of Life. In: Cardozo L (ed) Urogynecology: the King's approach. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uerbersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence. The Urogenital Distress inventory and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 3:291–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish D, Fantl JA (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Neurourol Urodyn 14(2):131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garrattt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK (1993) Russell IT (1993) The SF 36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. BMJ 306:1440–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lam CLK, Gandek B, Ren XS, Chan MS (1998) Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1139–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wyman JF, Choi SC, Harkins SW, Wilson MS, Fantl JA (1988) The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinent women: a test–retest analysis. Obstet Gynaecol 71:812–817

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown JS, McNaughton KS, Wyman JF, Burgio KL, Harkaway R, Bergner D et al (2003) Urology 61(4):802–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bryant FB, Yarnold PR (1995) Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Grimm LG, Yarnold PR (eds) Reading and understanding multivariate analysis. American Psychological Association Books, Washington DC, pp 99–136

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gorusch RL (1983) Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  18. El-Azab AS, Mascha EJ (2009) Arabic validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and adapted Incontinence Impact Questionnaires—short forms. Neurourol Urodyn 28:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Cam M, Karateke A (2007) Validation of the short forms of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn 26:129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, Versi E (2003) The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU Int 92:731–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Barber MD, Agnes Chow for the translation process; Albe Pang and Connie Yuen for the help in recruiting women for the study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Symphorosa S. C. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, S.S.C., Choy, K.W., Lee, B.P.Y. et al. Chinese validation of Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form. Int Urogynecol J 21, 807–812 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1102-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1102-8

Keywords

Navigation