Skip to main content
Log in

Practice patterns of physician members of the American Urogynecologic Society regarding female sexual dysfunction: results of a national survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate practice patterns of members of the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) with respect to female sexual dysfunction (FSD). A brief self-administered survey of 20 questions was mailed to 966 physician members of the AUGS in the United States of America and Canada; 471 surveys were returned (49% response rate). The majority of responders see urogynecology (19%) or urogynecology and general gynecology patients (43%). Sixty-eight percent of physicians were familiar with questionnaires to assess FSD; however, only 13% said they use these for screening purposes. Most said they believed screening for FSD was somewhat (47%) or very important (42%). Despite having these beliefs, only 22% of the responding physicians stated they always screen for FSD, while 55% do so most of the time and 23% admitted they never or rarely screen. Similar results were obtained regarding screening following urogynecologic surgery. Several barriers to screening for FSD existed, the most common being lack of time. The majority of respondents (69%) underestimated the prevalence of FSD in their patient population. Finally, although more than half of responders had received post-residency training in urogynecology (59%), 50% of them stated the training with respect to FSD was unsatisfactory, while only 10% were satisfied. Overall, many urogynecologists do not consistently screen for FSD, underestimate its prevalence, and feel they received unsatisfactory training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J et al (2000) Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol 163:888–893

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC (1999) Sexual dysfunction in the United States; prevalence and predictors. JAMA 281:537–544

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mercer CH, Fenton KA, Johnson AM, Wellings K, Macdowall W, McManus S et al (2003) Sexual function problems and help seeking behavior in Britain: national probability sample survey. BMJ 327:426–427

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nazareth I, Boynton P, King M (2003) Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: cross sectional study. BMJ 327:423–426

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geiss IM, Umek WH, Dungl A, Sam C, Riss P, Hanzal E (2003) Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in gynecologic and urogynecologic patients according to the international consensus classification. Urology 62:514–518

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berman L, Berman J, Felder S, Pollets D, Chhabra S, Miles M et al (2003) Seeking help for sexual function complaints: what gynecologists need to know about the female patient’s experience. Fertil Steril 79:572–576

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rhodes JC, Kjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, Guzinski GM (1999) Hysterectomy and sexual functioning. JAMA 282:1934–1941

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrell AS, Kieser K (2000) Sexuality after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95:1045–1051

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR (2000) Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1610–1615

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vassallo BJ, Karram MM (2003) Management of iatrogenic vaginal constriction. Obstet Gynecol 101:512–520

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haboubi NH, Lincoln N (2003) Views of health professionals on discussing sexual issues with patients. Disabil Rehabil 25:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gott M, Hinchliff S, Galena E (2004) General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people. Soc Sci Med 58:2093–2103

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drane JE (1991) Imputing nonresponses to mail-back questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 134:908–912

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Hatton Research Department, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. These results were presented as a poster at the American Urogynecologic Society and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Joint Scientific meeting, July 2004, San Diego, California.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel N. Pauls.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pauls, R.N., Kleeman, S.D., Segal, J.L. et al. Practice patterns of physician members of the American Urogynecologic Society regarding female sexual dysfunction: results of a national survey. Int Urogynecol J 16, 460–467 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1286-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1286-5

Keywords

Navigation