Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Levator plate movement during voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in subjects with incontinence and prolapse: a cross-sectional study and review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transabdominal ultrasound was used to assess 104 women with incontinence and prolapse. The bladder was used as a marker of levator plate (LP) movement. The women were asked to draw in and lift the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and a change in position of the LP in a cranial or caudal direction during contraction was documented. Three different patterns of movement of the LP were identified, with 38% of subjects elevating and 43% of subjects depressing the LP; 19% had no change in LP movement. In the stress incontinence group there was a higher than expected number that elevated the LP. In the urgency and prolapse groups there was a higher than expected number of subjects that depressed the LP (P=0.008).The results highlight three different subgroups based on the patients' attempt to initiate elevation of the LP. Subjects who depressed the LP when instructed to elevate it appeared to adopt straining strategies via the generation of intra-abdominal pressure. Depression of the LP may have long-term negative implications for prolapse and incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LP:

levator plate

PFM:

pelvic floor muscles

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Bo K, Talseth T, Holme I (1999) Single blind randomised control trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones and no treatment in the management of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br J Med 318:487–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeLancey J (1988) Anatomy and mechanics of structures around the vesical neck: how vesical neck position might affect its closure. Neurourol Urodyn 7:161–295

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kegel A (1948) Progressive resistance exercises in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 56:238–249

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz H, Wilson P (1998) Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and video-cystourethrography. Int Urogynecol J 9:365–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen L, Djurhuus J, Constantinou C (1995) Imaging pelvic floor contractions using MRI. Neurourol Urodyn 14:209–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bo K, Lilleas F, Talseth T, Hedland H (2001) Dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor muscles in upright sitting. Neurourol Urodyn 20:167–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bump R, Hurt WG, Fantl JA, Wyman JF (1991) Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:322–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Theofrastous J, Wyman JF, Bump RC, McClish DK, Elser DM, Robinson D, Fantl JA (1997) Relationship between urethral and vaginal pressures during pelvic muscle contraction. Neurourol Urodyn 16:553–558

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Loenen N, Vierhout M (1997) Augmentation of urethral pressure profile by voluntary pelvic floor contraction. Int Urogynecol J 8:284–287

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bo K, Finckenhagen H (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bo K, Stein R (1994) Needle EMG registration of striated urethral wall and pelvic floor muscle activity patterns during cough, Valsalva, abdominal, hip adductor and gluteal muscle contractions in nulliparous healthy females. Neurourol Urodyn 13:35–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laycock J (1995) Pelvic floor dysfunction. Bradford: University of Bradford

  13. Dietz H, Wilson P, Clarke B (2001) The use of perineal ultrasound to quantify levator activity and teach pelvic floor muscle exercises. Int Urogynecol J 12:166–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peschers U, Gingelmaier A, Jundt K, Leib B, Dimpfl T (2001) Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength using four different techniques. Int Urogynecol J 12:27–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peschers U, Schaer GN, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (1997) Levator ani function before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1004–1006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peschers U, Schaer G, Anthuber C, Delancey JO, Schuessler B (1996) Changes in vesical neck mobility following vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 88:1001–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaer G et al. (1995) Simultaneous perineal ultrasound and urodynamic assessment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 6:168–174

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sampselle C, Brink C, Wells T (1989) Digital measurement of pelvic muscle strength in childbearing women. Nurse Res 38:134–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy C, Sherburn M, Allen T (2002) Investigation of transabdominal diagnostic ultrasound as a clinical tool and outcome measure in the conservative measurement of pelvic flor muscle dysfunction. Proc Int Continence Soc Meeting, Heidelberg. Abstract 129:61

    Google Scholar 

  20. O'Sullivan P, Beales DJ, Beetham JA, Cripps J, Graf F, Lin IB, Tucker B, Avery A (2002) Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test. Spine 27:E1–E8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Avery A, O'Sullivan P, MacCallum M (2000) Evidence of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in subjects with chronic sacro-iliac joint pain syndrome. Proceedings of the 7th Scientific Conference of the IFOMT

  22. Miller J, Aston-Miller J, DeLancey J (1996) The Knack: use of precisely timed pelvic muscle contraction can reduce leakage in SUI. Neurourol Urodyn 15:392–393

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neumann P, Gill V (2002) Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int Urogynecol J 13:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benvenuti F, Caputo GM, Bandinelli S, Mayer F, Biagini C, Sommavilla A (1987) Reeducative treatment of female genuine stress incontinence. Am J Phys Med 66:155–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bo K, Oseid S, Kuarstein B et al. (1988) Knowledge about and ability to correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urinary stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 7:261–262

    Google Scholar 

  26. DeLancey J (1993) Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:897–909

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith A. Thompson.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: These authors present a descriptive analysis of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction who were observed with an abdominal ultrasound while attempting voluntarily to contract their pelvic floor muscles. There seems to have been significant bias when the initial classification of patients was made. It is important to recognize the limitations of this study design. This is a descriptive study, which is only capable of showing statistical associations between groups. No cause and effect relationships among these groups should be assumed. It seems reasonable that transabdominal ultrasound may have an important role when assessing pelvic muscle contractility. Using this technique to teach patients to contract their pelvic floor effectively would be an interesting application. Further research in this area will be welcomed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.A., O'Sullivan, P.B. Levator plate movement during voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in subjects with incontinence and prolapse: a cross-sectional study and review. Int Urogynecol J 14, 84–88 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1036-5

Keywords

Navigation