Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimum wages and youth binge drinking

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Binge drinking is associated with many health problems, including unintentional injuries, intentional injuries (e.g., domestic violence, sexual assault), unintended pregnancy, and liver disease. Moreover, high-volume episodic binge drinking is very prevalent among teenagers and young adults. Given that approximately 90 % of the alcohol consumed by youth under the age of 21 in the USA is in the form of binge drinking (Murphy et al. in Addict Res Theory 20(6):456–465, 2012), understanding the determinants of binge drinking behavior, particularly among youth, is important from the perspective of health and policy. In this paper, we explore the relationship between youth binge drinking and an unanticipated determinate of this behavior, minimum wage laws. Using a fixed effects regression model, we observe a positive relationship between minimum wage increases and binge drinking among teenagers. We find that, after accounting for demographic characteristics, different types of risky behaviors, excise tax, state and time fixed effects, and time-varying state effects, a $1 increase in minimum wage increases binge drinking among teenagers by approximately 9 %. Our results support recent findings that minimum wage increases are positively associated with alcohol-related accidents among teenagers (Adam et al. in Rev Econ Stat 94(3):828–840, 2012). Findings suggest that authorities should consider the unexpected impacts that minimum wage increase may have on alcohol consumption among teens and consider parallel policies to help mitigate potential negative consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. YBRS provides a repeated cross section of teens from different states over time, and it does not provide repeated information on the same teens.

  2. Allison and Waterman (2002) demonstrate that a conditional likelihood method for negative binomial regression does not qualify as a true fixed effects method because it does not control for unchanging covariates, and hence, an unconditional estimation of a fixed effects negative binomial model is needed.

  3. In all cases, the test statistic is large and negative. These findings suggest that the zero-inflated model is indistinguishable from the nonzero-inflated analog, indicating that excess zeros are not likely generated by a separate process from the count values.

  4. Results are robust to using a zero-inflated negative binominal approach, with participant age and smoking habits used as the inflators. See Appendix 2.

  5. Results are robust to excluding 1991 from the sample.

References

  • Adams S, Blackburn LMK, Cotti DC (2012) Minimum wages and alcohol-related traffic fatalities among teens. Rev Econ Stat 94(3):828–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison TJ, Blackburn LMK, Cotti DC (2009) Do minimum wages raise employment? Evidence from the U.S. retail-trade sector. Labour Econ 16(4):397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander Wagenaar C, Traci Toomey L (2002) Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol 14:206–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison DP, Waterman PR (2002) Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol Methodol 32:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-group estimators. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 49(4):0305–9049

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkes J (2007) Does the economy affect teenage substance use? Health Econ 16(1):19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust difference in differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card D (1992) Do minimum wages reduce employment? A case study of California 1987–1989. Ind Labor Relat Rev 46:22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card D, Krueger BA (1994) Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Am Econ Rev 84:772–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (2012) Teen drinking and driving—a dangerous mix: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/TeenDrinkingAndDriving/index.html

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system. http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/teen_drivers/teendrivers_factsheet.html

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Fact sheets—binge drinking: http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/binge-drinking.htm

  • Current population study—ORG: http://www.nber.org/data/morg.html

  • Current population study – ORG: http://www.nber.org/data/morg.html

  • Dube A, Lester TW, Reich M (2010) Minimum wage effects across state borders: estimates using contiguous counties. Revf Econ Stat 92(4):945–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman J, Hall HB, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with applications to the patents R and D relationship. Econometrica 52:909–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M (2000) Effects of recent 0.08 % legal blood alcohol limits on fatal crash involvement. Injury Prev 6:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz S, Tauras J (2009) Substance use among adolescent students with consideration of budget constraints. Rev Econ Household 7(4):423–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GJ et al (2012) A behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. Addict Res Theory 20(6):456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naimi TS et al (2003) Binge drinking among U.S. adults. J Am Med Assoc 289(1):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (2003) National survey of American attitudes on substance abuse VIII: Teens and parents. Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark D, Wascher LW (2008) Minimum wages. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen Hoeksema S (2004) Gender differences in risk factors and consequences for alcohol use and problems. Clin Psychol Rev 24:981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) (2005) Drinking in America: myths, realities, and prevention policy. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC

  • Ruhm JC (1996) Alcohol policies and highway vehicle fatalities. J Health Econ 15(4):435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/moderate-binge-drinking

  • Vuong HQ (1989) Likelihood ratio rests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar AC, Toomey LT (2002) Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 14:206–225

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chad Cotti.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 6.

Table 6 Nominal minimum wages by state and year (in dollars), 1991–2011

Appendix 2

See Table 7.

Table 7 Zero-inflated negative binomial: estimates for the determinants of binge drinking among teenagers aged 14–18

Appendix 3

See Table 8.

Table 8 Negative binomial estimates for the determinants of binge drinking among teenagers aged 14–18; estimates including interactions with the proportion of teen workers near minimum wage

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoke, O., Cotti, C. Minimum wages and youth binge drinking. Empir Econ 51, 363–381 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0998-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0998-8

Keywords

JEL Classfication

Navigation