Skip to main content
Log in

New method of diagnosis for chronic ankle instability: comparison of manual anterior drawer test, stress radiography and stress ultrasound

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To diagnose chronic ankle instability, clinicians frequently use manual anterior drawer test and stress radiography. However, both exams can yield incorrect results and do not reveal the extent of ankle instability. The use of stress ultrasound during a manual anterior drawer stress procedure might enable the diagnosis of chronic ankle instability.

Methods

Seventy-three patients with chronic ankle pain or laxity after remote ankle sprain were included. The study population included 41 males and 32 females. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 29 years. A standardized physical examination (manual anterior drawer test), stress radiography and stress ultrasonography were performed to assess the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). Ultrasound images were taken in the resting position and the maximal anterior drawer position. The statistical significance of stress ultrasound among the three groups according to manual anterior drawer test and a specific degree (5 mm) of anterior translation of stress radiography were analysed. Correlation coefficients between stress ultrasound, stress radiography and manual anterior drawer test were calculated.

Results

There was a significant difference for ATFL length (ATFL stress) and ATFL ratio (ATFL stress/ATFL resting) among the three groups (both p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference for anterior translation of stress radiography among three groups according to manual anterior drawer test (p = 0.159). There was a significant difference for ATFL length (ATFL stress) and ATFL ratio between two groups with 5-mm anterior translation of stress radiography (p = 0.002 and p = 0.011, respectively). The mean value of grade of manual anterior drawer test between the two groups also differed (p = 0.021). There was a moderately positive linear relationship between stress ultrasound and manual anterior drawer test. Also, there was a positive linear relationship between stress ultrasound and stress radiography.

Conclusion

The results suggest that the value of ATFL length (ATFL stress) and ATFL ratio of stress ultrasound could be used for diagnosis of chronic ankle instability in addition to manual anterior drawer test and stress radiography.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alparslan L, Chiodo CP (2008) Lateral ankle instability: MR imaging of associated injuries and surgical treatment procedures. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 12(4):346–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aradi AJ, Wong J, Walsh M (1988) The dimple sign of a ruptured lateral ligament of the ankle: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70(2):327–328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balduini FC, Vegso JJ, Torg JS, Torg E (1987) Management and rehabilitation of ligamentous injuries to the ankle. Sports Med 4(5):364–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks SC, Potter BT, Rainey JB (1981) Treatment for partial tears of the lateral ligament of the ankle: a prospective trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282(6264):606–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell DG, Menz A, Isaacs J (1994) Dynamic ankle ultrasonography. A new imaging technique for acute ankle ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 22(6):855–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandnani VP, Harper MT, Ficke JR, Gagliardi JA, Rolling L, Christensen KP, Hansen MF (1994) Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR arthrography, MR imaging, and stress radiography. Radiology 192(1):189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Croy T, Saliba SA, Saliba E, Anderson MW, Hertel J (2012) Differences in lateral ankle laxity measured via stress ultrasonography in individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle sprain copers, and healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(7):593–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Maeseneer M, Marcelis S, Jager T, Shahabpour M, Van Roy P, Weaver J, Jacobson JA (2009) Sonography of the normal ankle: a target approach using skeletal reference points. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(2):487–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans GA, Hardcastle P, Frenyo AD (1984) Acute rupture of the lateral ligament of the ankle. To suture or not to suture? J Bone Joint Surg Br 66(2):209–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujii T, Luo ZP, Kitaoka HB, An KN (2000) The manual stress test may not be sufficient to differentiate ankle ligament injuries. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15(8):619–623

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaser F, Friedl W, Welk E (1989) The value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of capsule ligament injuries of the upper ankle joint. Unfallchirurg 92(11):540–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glasgow M, Jackson A, Jamieson AM (1980) Instability of the ankle after injury to the lateral ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62-B(2):196–200

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guillodo Y, Riban P, Guennoc X, Dubrana F, Saraux A (2007) Usefulness of ultrasonographic detection of talocrural effusion in ankle sprains. J Ultrasound Med 26(6):831–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillodo Y, Varache S, Saraux A (2010) Value of ultrasonography for detecting ligament damage in athletes with chronic ankle instability compared to computed arthrotomography. Foot Ankle Spec 3(6):331–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hubbard TJ (2008) Ligament laxity following inversion injury with and without chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 29(3):305–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kannus P, Renstrom P (1991) Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(2):305–312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karlsson J, Lansinger O (1992) Lateral instability of the ankle joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:253–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lahde S, Putkonen M, Puranen J, Raatikainen T (1988) Examination of the sprained ankle: anterior drawer test or arthrography? Eur J Radiol 8(4):255–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsen E (1986) Experimental instability of the ankle: a radiographic investigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 204:193–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee KT, Park YU, Kim JS, Kim JB, Kim KC, Kang SK (2011) Long-term results after modified Brostrom procedure without calcaneofibular ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 32(2):153–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Milz P, Milz S, Steinborn M, Mittlmeier T, Putz R, Reiser M (1998) Lateral ankle ligaments and tibiofibular syndesmosis: 13-MHz high-frequency sonography and MRI compared in 20 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oae K, Takao M, Uchio Y, Ochi M (2010) Evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injury with stress radiography, ultrasonography and MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 39(1):41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peetrons P, Creteur V, Bacq C (2004) Sonography of ankle ligaments. J Clin Ultrasound 32(9):491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pijnenburg AC, Bogaard K, Krips R, Marti RK, Bossuyt PM, van Dijk CN (2003) Operative and functional treatment of rupture of the lateral ligament of the ankle. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(4):525–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rasmussen O (1985) Stability of the ankle joint. Analysis of the function and traumatology of the ankle ligaments. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 211:1–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasmussen O, Tovborg-Jensen I (1981) Anterolateral rotational instability in the ankle joint. An experimental study of anterolateral rotational instability, talar tilt, and anterior drawer sign in relation to injuries to the lateral ligaments. Acta Orthop Scand 52(1):99–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rijke AM (1995) MR imaging versus stress radiography in the evaluation of chronic ankle instability. Radiology 196(2):580–581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seligson D, Gassman J, Pope M (1980) Ankle instability: evaluation of the lateral ligaments. Am J Sports Med 8(1):39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sisson L, Croy T, Saliba S, Hertel J (2011) Comparison of ankle arthrometry to stress ultrasound imaging in the assessment of ankle laxity in healthy adults. Int J Sports Phys Ther 6(4):297–305

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tohyama H, Yasuda K, Ohkoshi Y, Beynnon BD, Renstrom PA (2003) Anterior drawer test for acute anterior talofibular ligament injuries of the ankle. How much load should be applied during the test? Am J Sports Med 31(2):226–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tourne Y, Besse JL, Mabit C, Sofcot (2010) Chronic ankle instability. Which tests to assess the lesions? Which therapeutic options? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(4):433–446

  32. van Dijk CN, Mol BW, Lim LS, Marti RK, Bossuyt PM (1996) Diagnosis of ligament rupture of the ankle joint. Physical examination, arthrography, stress radiography and sonography compared in 160 patients after inversion trauma. Acta Orthop Scand 67(6):566–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Uk Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, K.T., Park, Y.U., Jegal, H. et al. New method of diagnosis for chronic ankle instability: comparison of manual anterior drawer test, stress radiography and stress ultrasound. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 1701–1707 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2690-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2690-x

Keywords

Navigation